Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

UK Border Force

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2015, 10:05
  #21 (permalink)  
419
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suggest a separate immigration line for those of us from low risk countries such as USA, Canada, AUS/NZ, Japan, Singapore etc.
And there have never been terrorists who were nationals of "low risk" countries have there?
419 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2015, 12:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
419,
The UK has APIS. The UK Border Force has all of our details before our aircraft has taken off. If they want to keep out the terrorists they can deny permission to the airline before take off.

But for some reason the UK Border Force is unable, or unwilling, to use the APIS data for any sort of pre-arrival screening or analysis. They ask us the same bleeding questions as we submitted for APIS and filled out on the landing card.

Now that they have made it inconvenient for us no-risk passengers they want to extort £50 a year from us. Bar-stewards.
ExXB is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2015, 13:29
  #23 (permalink)  
419
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The UK has APIS. The UK Border Force has all of our details before our aircraft has taken off. If they want to keep out the terrorists they can deny permission to the airline before take off.
There are other countries that also require passengers to submit information before travel with that info being made available to officials in the destination country (USA for example), yet you may still have to undergo immigration checks on arrival.

APIS is all very well but it does nothing to stop people who are flying on altered or borrowed passports or people who might not show up as suspicious on the computer but when given face to face questioning may well turn out to be dodgy.
419 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2015, 21:59
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These officials are trained to spot any telltale signs in your body language and your answers.
This obviously doesn't apply to US Department of Homeland Security officials at airports. I reckon using a knife and fork and going to the toilet are advanced functions for these cretins. Nasty, spiteful, stupid they can do. But don't count on anything else.

In the UK, we are burdened by the decisions made by the crap-for-brains high level managers inside our immigration service. Not only have they created not-fit-for-purpose systems for those with passports, the systems in place don't keep the smellies out because they don't have passports and don't follows the rules. Economic Migrants 1, UK Border Force 0. What is worse is that when a smelly gets in, the git gets bloody legal aid at my expense! I think we should send them all round to Shami Chakrabarti's house to live.

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 12:46
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
I've only ever had good experiences with US Officials. You hear all the stories about stern faced people , don't make jokes at them, don't even smile etc (usually from the airline!) but I've always found them polite and respectful. OK I don't risk making jokes at them, but answer their questions politely, and I've never left without a 'have a nice day' or 'enjoy your stay'
Davef68 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 20:52
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Most countries have officials that can have a good day or bad day. Australia is better than most limited (sample size of 4 in my case). One officer remarked that her father lived very near where I came from when I passed through.

The trouble with US officials is that they are too robotic. Doubtless the training. 'Have you ever had a visa revoked?' Answer in my case 'yes without prejudice' as it was over ten years old so I tick the box. I assume that 'without prejudice' means that I had done nothing wrong. The guy at Newark (surely the worst airport for border inspection) promptly marches me off to Secondary. Luckily an intelligent agent with common sense clears me in five minutes (so I'll partially take back my comment). That said I've found charming staff at SFO & HNL. YVR preclearance was OK.

Japan has some of the most courteous people on earth but their border control can be officious.

I wonder if there is a correlation between how polite a country's people are and how polite their immigration & customs staff are?

As an aside, the Economist magazine is right. We shouldn't have a sign at airports saying UK Border but sating Welcome to the UK (or London or whatever). I think that was an idea of Gordon Brown but its unfair to single out a single politician - they are all as bad as each other. I much preferred it when immigration staff didn't have uniforms. It didn't make them any less effective.

Last edited by Peter47; 22nd Aug 2015 at 20:10.
Peter47 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 21:24
  #27 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 832
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
It's just people doing their jobs,and quite often there's no latitude to deviate from the set procedures.

Just answer the questions promptly and you'll be on your way.And always be polite to anyone in uniform,especially at borders,it's just good sense
TWT is online now  
Old 22nd Aug 2015, 09:00
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good idea, if I get questioned next time I'll simply show them one of my credit cards and point out that that the limit on it is more than their annual income and that I earn three times as much as they do. That should get me waved through as quickly as I deserve.
Metro man is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2015, 09:02
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Soon to be out of the EU.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh for gods sake man, grow up.
HeartyMeatballs is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2015, 09:25
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Simply Towers.
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Clearly, Metro Man is having a laugh...hes winding everyone up. Either that or he really does need to get over himself. I almost feel like joining the Border Agency just in the hope I can greet him one day and discuss his salary and status during the very very long transit through the border!
Simplythebeast is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2015, 17:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Malaga
Posts: 161
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
@Peter47 +1
...As an aside, the Economist magazine is right. We shouldn't have a sign at airports saying Border Force but stating Welcome to the UK...I much preferred it when immigration staff didn't have uniforms. It didn't make them any less effective...
An in your face UK Border sign is extremely poor psychology. If you are attempting irregular entry it's unlikely to make a difference since you have already decided to try. If you're a regular/tired/grumpy traveller it's a red rag to a bull that makes matters worse.

Border Force obviously bought the uniforms from Primark. Without disrespect to individual officers some, er, don't really wear them well. When they wore their own choice of smart civilian clothes they seemed nicely understated and probably more effective for that
farci is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2015, 18:28
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 391
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
I have a Romanian friend who works for a Swiss pharmaceutical company. On arrival at Heathrow on a business trip from Zurich she was asked by a 'professional' from UK Border force whether she was 'entering the UK for the purposes of prostitution'. She doesn't come here any more. our loss, not hers.
SLF3 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2015, 18:57
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
That's appalling.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2015, 00:29
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Holiday Inn Express 'clerk thought Alecsandra Puflea was a prostitute' | Daily Mail Online

Graduate and boyfriend denied room at Holiday Inn Express because 'clerk thought she was a Romanian prostitute'
Alecsandra Puflea said she and her boyfriend were turned away by staff
She claims a worker told her: 'I'm sorry, but we don't accept Romanians'
She said police told her the hotel is screening guests under a new policy
Other Romanian women were using the rooms for prostitution, she said
Hotel spokesperson said it 'is definitely not a case of racial discrimination'
Holiday Inn Express has apologised and is now reviewing its local policy
By CHRIS KITCHING and EMILY PAYNE FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 09:45 GMT, 22 July 2015 | UPDATED: 00:58 GMT, 23 July 2015
Metro man is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2015, 06:58
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,088
Received 293 Likes on 164 Posts
I have a Romanian friend who works for a Swiss pharmaceutical company. On arrival at Heathrow on a business trip from Zurich she was asked by a 'professional' from UK Border force whether she was 'entering the UK for the purposes of prostitution'. She doesn't come here any more. our loss, not hers.
Graduate and boyfriend denied room at Holiday Inn Express because 'clerk thought she was a Romanian prostitute'
Alecsandra Puflea said she and her boyfriend were turned away by staff
She claims a worker told her: 'I'm sorry, but we don't accept Romanians'
She said police told her the hotel is screening guests under a new policy
Other Romanian women were using the rooms for prostitution, she said
Hotel spokesperson said it 'is definitely not a case of racial discrimination'
Holiday Inn Express has apologised and is now reviewing its local policy
By CHRIS KITCHING and EMILY PAYNE FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 09:45 GMT, 22 July 2015 | UPDATED: 00:58 GMT, 23 July 2015
I'm afraid that these two accounts serve only to highlight the undercurrent of *enophobia that is growing within the UK, fueled by political parties such as UKIP, and elements of the Conservative party, along with some of the usual suspects within the print media.

Talking to people, as I do as part of my job, it is easy to detect these attitudes, with the sweeping, usually negative and often completely false claims they make regarding "foreigners" in UK.

Whilst the UK certainly does have to gurard it's borders against illegal migrants, it needs to do it in a rather more intelligent way, rather than tarring all people of certain nationalities with a single brush.
ATNotts is online now  
Old 28th Aug 2015, 10:37
  #36 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
This is all very natural 'end of empire' behaviour. The examples are rife. This week alone, apart from seeing the treatment of other human beings that are not 'us', we see 'us' promoting their cronies into the House of Lords.

Then there is the sight of one political party trying to hijack the internal election of another political party and thinking this is 'good sport'. The Era of the Great Decadence is upon us ....

Last edited by PAXboy; 28th Aug 2015 at 10:52.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2015, 17:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: liverpool uk
Age: 67
Posts: 1,338
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Whilst the UK certainly does have to gurard it's borders against illegal migrants, it needs to do it in a rather more intelligent way, rather than tarring all people of certain nationalities with a single brush.
Your 'human rights' proponents say that and has been declared illegal and discriminatory, just try to get into Israel and then complain.
air pig is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2015, 08:49
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,088
Received 293 Likes on 164 Posts
Originally Posted by air pig
Your 'human rights' proponents say that and has been declared illegal and discriminatory, just try to get into Israel and then complain.
....A country I have absolutely no intention of donating my hard earned cash to by setting foot on it's soil.

I think you'll find many nations do take a more enlightened approach to checks than does UK in the "May era".
ATNotts is online now  
Old 29th Aug 2015, 08:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
air pig

just try to get into Israel and then complain.
Israeli do it for a reason - it is efficient and does not great huge backlogs on the way in at least. I went there almost 3 years ago to date and I find it ok - nothing to seriously complain about.



Rwy in Sight
Rwy in Sight is online now  
Old 29th Aug 2015, 12:05
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North of Hadrian's Wall
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "in your face" attitude of the British immigration officials of West African origin" tells me all I need to know about you Metro Man. I'd suggest that racists like yourself ought to be permanently banned from entering the UK.
theredbarron is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.