Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Turbulence injures 10 on UA935 LHR-LAX

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Turbulence injures 10 on UA935 LHR-LAX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th May 2010, 21:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbulence injures 10 on UA935 LHR-LAX

CNN: A United Airlines jet en route from London, England, to Los Angeles, California, was diverted Tuesday to Montreal, Quebec, after turbulence injured 10 people aboard, an airline spokeswoman said. Flight 935 had departed London's Heathrow International Airport bound for Los Angeles International Airport at 10:05 a.m. (5:05 a.m. ET) carrying three pilots, 12 flight attendants and 196 passengers, spokeswoman Megan McCarthy said.
But the Boeing 777, which was to have landed at 1:15 p.m. (4:15 p.m. ET), encountered severe turbulence over the Atlantic Ocean and landed instead at Montreal's Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport, she said.
The injured people -- nine passengers and a crew member -- were taken to an area hospital with injuries that are not life-threatening and will stay in Montreal.
The remaining passengers and crew were to travel to Los Angeles aboard an aircraft that was being sent to Montreal from Chicago, Illinois, McCarthy said. The airline's website estimated their arrival in Los Angeles at 8:02 p.m. (11:02 p.m. ET).
Must have been some wild ride.

- GY

Last edited by GarageYears; 25th May 2010 at 21:07. Reason: Spelling... the devils in the details
GarageYears is offline  
Old 25th May 2010, 23:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hamilton Ontario
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Montreal emergency landing

Canadian media variously cite 6-10 injured, the discrepancy may be due to reports that medical personnel treated some passengers on board for minor injuries (cuts and bruises), but six were transported to hospital, including a pregnant woman, an injured flight attendant and a passenger (other reports say a crew member) with a compound fracture of the arm..

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation report here:
CBC News - Montreal - United Airlines flight turbulence injures 10
palisadesk is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 01:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: hkg
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the above:

"Turbulence severe enough to cause injury to passengers is a rare occurrence, said Joanne Richards, a flight attendant trainer with Air Transat.

"For these injuries, it has got to be unpredicted," she said. "That could do with air pressure, wind, the jet stream, [or] the temperature.

"It's a very hot day today as everyone has noticed.""

Hmmm.
hkgmjq is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 02:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm is right

seat belt sign on?
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 02:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: hong kong
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clear air turbulence rarely gives any pre warning to secure the cabin and passengers and it's amazing how many passengers still don't leave their seat belts loosely fastened even when the seat belt sign is off.
onprofile is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 04:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how many people in cruise still keep their belts off even with the sign on? Now they know...
413X3 is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 04:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Limboland
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...how many people sitting on the bog?
Smoketrails is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 07:31
  #8 (permalink)  

Nice
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: All Over
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've only crossed the atlantic once, and ended up being being strapped in for three hours in smooth conditions (American carrier). I needed the loo, I didn't leave my seat, but plenty of people did. Not pointing the finger as I don't know what went on up there, but food for thought perhaps.
Paracab is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 08:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Limbricht
Posts: 2,195
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Folks, we've been down this 'seat belt' road dozens of times before here on PPRuNe. It comes up every time pax get injured in turbulence. Bottom line is that for valid reasons there will always be a few that get caught out, not least cabin crew. On a 11 hour flight I sit/lie with my seat belt on. However, I will need the restroom at least a couple of times. If the seat belt sign is off I'm going to go. Now, it may just be my bad luck that just at that point we hit moderate/severe turbulence and bingo I'm an injury statistic. It's just one of many of life's risks we have to take. Live with it.
Avman is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 09:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The blasted heath
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have noticed that U.S. carriers sometimes have the seat belt sign on for the entire trip. Or, are likely to have it on for even minor turbulence when european carriers would not.
But as has been stated, these things will happend from time to time. Though some areas are more prone to it; mid summer approach to BCN letting down over the mountains springs to mind!
gcal is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 09:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CNX/AGP
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding the issue of leaving seat belts loosely fastened. I think the considerable variation in seat belt length is an issue here. I am 6'4" and of fairly large frame. I wouldn't describe myself as obese (honest!). I would much prefer to keep my belt on in the cruise. Sometimes the belt is long enough that one can slouch comfortably in the seat with it fastened. Other belts are so short that it is really only feasible to sit bolt upright when wearing them. When faced with a short belt like this, I have to confess that I sometimes trade maximum safety for comfort. Wish they were all the longer length type.
TG345 is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 10:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: LHR
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Though some areas are more prone to it; mid summer approach to BCN letting down over the mountains springs to mind!
Really?? Not discounting your point but I fly that way all the time and I've never noticed an increase in turbulence over the mountains in the summer over any other time of year. Unless your referring to thunderstorm activity which obviously during July/August is a bit more of a common occurence. Generally I find it to be a bit more choppy in that area over the winter when it's windy over the hills.
Like I said not discounting your point, maybe I've just been lucky! Off to work now anyway, hopefully a smooooth day out!

CB
Cloud Bunny is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 10:18
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TG345

Wish they were all the longer length type.
Try asking for an extension. You never know your luck, you might find a rare combination of one being available and a cabin crew member inclined and empowered to be as helpful as possible, rather than inclined by nature and training to think of a reason for refusing, however bizarre.
Capot is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 12:20
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Luton
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and alas, if clear air turb, the crew are likely to have loaded bar or meal carts in the aisle too which fly about the cabin!
clipstone1 is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 12:42
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You never know your luck, you might find a rare combination of one being available and a cabin crew member inclined and empowered to be as helpful as possible, rather than inclined by nature and training to think of a reason for refusing, however bizarre. Today 11:07
Eine Woche im kühleren für Sie!
glad rag is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 12:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North America
Age: 64
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
U.S. seatbelt policy driven by.........................

gcal,

I have noticed that U.S. carriers sometimes have the seat belt sign on for the entire trip. Or, are likely to have it on for even minor turbulence when european carriers would not.”

It all comes down to money and liability. A decade or so ago a passenger (relative of a famous film director) was injured in flight. They had the resources to hire an effective attorney who very successfully sued the airline for damages. Remember, this is the country (U.S.A.) where a jury awarded a plaintiff 2.7 million dollars (later reduced by the Judge in the case to $480,000) for being burned by a hot cup of coffee at a McDonald’s restaurant. http://www.hurt911.org/mcdonalds.html

My airline tells me to have the seatbelt on whenever there is any turbulence. We are also required to notify the passengers that while seated our airline’s policy is that they are obligated to have their seatbelts fastened regardless of whether the seatbelt sign is on or off. It is mandatory for us to make several announcements regarding the seatbelt during every flight.

Much of the time I cannot predict or detect turbulence. If you are unsecured in your seat, and we encounter turbulence, you stand a greater chance of being injured.

I do not fly European carriers very often, so I have no relative experience to compare. If you notice U.S. carriers having their seatbelt signs illuminated much more it is because of the litigious society and defensive legal strategies driven by corporate attorneys.
Northbeach is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 13:23
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NorthBeach

I fully understand the liability thing but where does that stop. There was a massive media coverage on DVTs on long haul flights especially. It is now common to see many passengers on walk abouts in flight I presume to protect themselves from DVTs or just boredom.

On the whole pilots are aware of potentional turbulence by a number of means so there should be no need to have the seatbelts ON for the complete flight.

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 26th May 2010, 14:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alabama, USA
Age: 75
Posts: 52
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NorthBeach

I fully understand the liability thing but where does that stop...
Agreed, but this is a case where risk of lawyers greatly outweighs the risk of sitting unbelted.

--Bill
Bill Harris is offline  
Old 27th May 2010, 09:38
  #19 (permalink)  
Everything is under control.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once I was walking in an aisle and turbulence hit. It was really, really bad. I was in big trouble and didn't know what to do but a United flight attendant had it under control in 10 seconds. Here is what she had me do.

1. Lie down in the aisle.

2. Take one arm and loop it through the bottom of a seat frame.

3. Grab both wrists.

That's it. What happens is your body yanks against the inside of your elbow for as long as the turbulence lasts. Because your arm is bent, it acts as a hook, and it is easy to keep your hands together. (If you just grab on to a fixed object with your hands, you can be yanked away.) The inside of your elbow may be bruised and sore for a few days, but you'll stay in one place.
Eboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.