Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Hawker Sea Fury Runway Requirements

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Hawker Sea Fury Runway Requirements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2020, 08:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hawker Sea Fury Runway Requirements

Just curious after watching some videos, on the length & width for a runway required to operate a warbird as a home base. Assumptions are asphalt, day only with clear approaches. It seems that many of the fields these are operated out of are around 1100m.

Sea Fury
A1 Skraider
Mustang
Guptar is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 09:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Found an empty asphalt highway?
Stickshift3000 is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 09:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paradise
Age: 68
Posts: 1,551
Received 51 Likes on 19 Posts
The Sea Fury was capable of deck landings; with strings attached...........
chimbu warrior is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 09:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,288
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
If you watch the warbird ops at YTEM, many of the single engined aircraft use the grass...
Lead Balloon is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 11:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 266
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts


About 210m in Australia.
drpixie is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 12:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilots Notes Sea Fury A.P. 4018A May 1950. The only takeoff performance chart is for rocket-assisted take-off. RAF and RAAF Pilots Notes Mustang and other military types do not have take-off and landing distance charts. You simply 'eye-ball' the length and hope it's enough to get airborne.
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 19:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England
Age: 65
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick google brought up North American's own data sheet on the P-51D

North American P-51D performance figures

1040ft to get airborne at gross is pretty respectable, though 1720ft to clear a 50ft obstacle shows how the laminar wing didn't work well at lower speeds
Momoe is offline  
Old 18th May 2020, 02:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,279
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Sea Fury and A-1 both did 'free deck" takeoffs with about a 20 knot headwind from carriers using 500-600 ft deck runs. P-51 also did carrier trials too..
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 18th May 2020, 21:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd have thought a well prepared grass runway would be quite suitable unless the aircraft model in question was quite heavy. After all the Mustang was operated of grass airfields very successfully during WWII.
27/09 is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 00:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,315
Received 54 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Momoe
though 1720ft to clear a 50ft obstacle shows how the laminar wing didn't work well at lower speeds
No, it just shows low acceleration. Rate of climb is an "available excess thrust over drag" issue, not a lift coefficient issue.

PDR
PDR1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.