King Air down at Essendon?
Watching the 7.30 report.
Five people, tragically, have died and tonight, there are calls to close Essendon Airport. And I am positive that there will certainly be calls to revamp the regulations for stricter pilot training.
I wonder how many people have died as a result of car accidents in Victoria? And yet there are no calls for car drivers to be tested every year for their ability to drive in stormy weather. There are no calls for car drivers to be tested every two years for their ability to drive in daylight hours.
I wonder how many people have died as a result of a car accident on the Tullamarine freeway. And yet there are no calls as a result of these accidents to close the freeway.
This is a tragedy, that will affect (at least) five families forever.
When we are going to stop the blame game in aviation? And why do we accept such strict training and re-testing measures in aviation, when we don't apply them across the board to all transport?
And who on earth decided that GT was 'an aviation expert'?
Five people, tragically, have died and tonight, there are calls to close Essendon Airport. And I am positive that there will certainly be calls to revamp the regulations for stricter pilot training.
I wonder how many people have died as a result of car accidents in Victoria? And yet there are no calls for car drivers to be tested every year for their ability to drive in stormy weather. There are no calls for car drivers to be tested every two years for their ability to drive in daylight hours.
I wonder how many people have died as a result of a car accident on the Tullamarine freeway. And yet there are no calls as a result of these accidents to close the freeway.
This is a tragedy, that will affect (at least) five families forever.
When we are going to stop the blame game in aviation? And why do we accept such strict training and re-testing measures in aviation, when we don't apply them across the board to all transport?
And who on earth decided that GT was 'an aviation expert'?
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: brisbane
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed emphatically, the B200 is all but idiot proof. Power levers drifting back because of loose friction, notwithstanding, that's what your hand on the throttles is for, please remember the very first response to any power plant problem in a light a/c is ........ you guessed it....... POWER UP, if that is not understood 100%, then you're in the seat under false pretences.
Of all the light a/c, the B200 is the cream of the crop, and with autofeather serviceable, any power plant problem is an absolute walk in the park. What is it about light twin pilots making r/t calls at low altitude, ATC can't do anything but call out the fire trucks, and surely distracting your attention at a critical point is completely unnecessary. This seems to be a common theme in EFATO accidents in light twins.
Methinks back to basics would go a long way to preventing this sort of thing, ie Fly The Aircraft.
Just saying!
Of all the light a/c, the B200 is the cream of the crop, and with autofeather serviceable, any power plant problem is an absolute walk in the park. What is it about light twin pilots making r/t calls at low altitude, ATC can't do anything but call out the fire trucks, and surely distracting your attention at a critical point is completely unnecessary. This seems to be a common theme in EFATO accidents in light twins.
Methinks back to basics would go a long way to preventing this sort of thing, ie Fly The Aircraft.
Just saying!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey hoggsnortrupert, you're clearly very knowledgeable and experienced with the A/C type involved. And I can imagine how frustrating it is when you read peoples' (potentially) inane comments that indicate a lack of understanding or practical knowledge. But tonight many families have been decimated, the regular Joe Public community around Essendon that have no care or understanding of what GA means in this country now has a fresh incident that will stoke the "Close the airport!"fires and the aviation community have new uncertainty surrounding their ops, with potential for a grounding a definite threat, on the back of this crash that doesn't have an obvious explanation.
Against the backdrop of all of this upheaval and tragedy, perhaps a calmer and less aggravated countenance is required from old hands like yourself to demonstrate strength and stability.
Everyone responds differently to tragedies like this and I'm fully aware the tone in your posts could be part of the anger one feels when something seemingly so senseless and random happens. Anyhow, I hope you're okay and everyone else that's upset by this works through their emotions with some awareness of what happens. The industry's lost a very experienced pilot and his wife and children will be in a terrible state of shock and sadness. It's just not good all round.
Against the backdrop of all of this upheaval and tragedy, perhaps a calmer and less aggravated countenance is required from old hands like yourself to demonstrate strength and stability.
Everyone responds differently to tragedies like this and I'm fully aware the tone in your posts could be part of the anger one feels when something seemingly so senseless and random happens. Anyhow, I hope you're okay and everyone else that's upset by this works through their emotions with some awareness of what happens. The industry's lost a very experienced pilot and his wife and children will be in a terrible state of shock and sadness. It's just not good all round.
EFATO close to the ground, if you mess-up the drills best thing one can do is firewall everything, identify the dead engine and feather the prop - if the prop won't feather your have a BIG problem. After that clean the rest of it up and fly the aeroplane.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The pilot of the plane that crashed at Essendon Airport killing himself and four passengers on Tuesday was the subject of an ongoing investigation by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau that had been deferred on three separate occasions.
Oh no please don't say GT has finished the investigation already.
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyhow, I hope you're okay and everyone else that's upset by this works through their emotions with some awareness of what happens. The industry's lost a very experienced pilot and his wife and children will be in a terrible state of shock and sadness. It's just not good all round.
Kaz
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: brisbane
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a general rule in a single vehicle accident, it's not usually the tree at fault.
Let's face it, aircraft are well designed, well maintained, and overregulated to an exhausting level, whilst all things are possible, we can probably rule out lightening strike, impact by meteor, in flight break up, bomb, pilot incapacitation, the ATSB will no doubt examine everything with a fine tooth comb, but this has all the hallmarks of a Garden variety EFATO not flown to a satisfactory standard, in an a/c that goes like a home sick angel on one engine, just saying.
It bears remembering, no one has managed to invent a new way to come to grief in and aircraft for the last 50 years, generally it is the same old mistakes that keep getting repeated.
Let's face it, aircraft are well designed, well maintained, and overregulated to an exhausting level, whilst all things are possible, we can probably rule out lightening strike, impact by meteor, in flight break up, bomb, pilot incapacitation, the ATSB will no doubt examine everything with a fine tooth comb, but this has all the hallmarks of a Garden variety EFATO not flown to a satisfactory standard, in an a/c that goes like a home sick angel on one engine, just saying.
It bears remembering, no one has managed to invent a new way to come to grief in and aircraft for the last 50 years, generally it is the same old mistakes that keep getting repeated.
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,966
Received 92 Likes
on
53 Posts
Oh no please don't say GT has finished the investigation already.
Which is about accurate enough I guess.
What irritated me was the scenes showing anti Essendon Airport protesters and an interview with some Female who demanded the place be shut down etc etc.
Would really like to meet face to face such people. My comments to them would not be very nice!
B200 EFATO
Ladies and Gentlemen,
There is much conversation here about the content of the radio call describing the failure.
Can I please offer some advice to all without any reference to the actual course of events in this incident other than:
A radio call will not help you; a radio call does nothing for you!!
Making a radio call will reduce your capacity to fly, slow down your reactions and slow down your actions. DO NOT make radio calls in case of an EFATO.
The correct course of action is POWER DRAG TRIM and you will fly away safely.
I have flown the B200 and it was later in my career. I used to do my LPCs on the aircraft deliberately at MTOW and on one occasion the TRE would not let me feather to show me what it was like. It did climb away at V2 without the failed engine feathered, only just but it did climb when in trim with full power on the live engine and flown accurately at V2 without large control movements i.e. smoothly without any unnecessary drag.
Forget about radio calls and fly the aircraft accurately!!!!
After you have climbed away you can make a call only if you have capacity and after everything is under control.
MM
There is much conversation here about the content of the radio call describing the failure.
Can I please offer some advice to all without any reference to the actual course of events in this incident other than:
A radio call will not help you; a radio call does nothing for you!!
Making a radio call will reduce your capacity to fly, slow down your reactions and slow down your actions. DO NOT make radio calls in case of an EFATO.
The correct course of action is POWER DRAG TRIM and you will fly away safely.
I have flown the B200 and it was later in my career. I used to do my LPCs on the aircraft deliberately at MTOW and on one occasion the TRE would not let me feather to show me what it was like. It did climb away at V2 without the failed engine feathered, only just but it did climb when in trim with full power on the live engine and flown accurately at V2 without large control movements i.e. smoothly without any unnecessary drag.
Forget about radio calls and fly the aircraft accurately!!!!
After you have climbed away you can make a call only if you have capacity and after everything is under control.
MM
Hogsnortrupert. Yes, from a "suitable" runway it will.
But is YMEN 17 @ 5128' (5.29%) "suitable"?
I only have an old dusty SuperKingAir 200 Raisbeck HFG manual and it's interesting how marginal it is reading the graphs with YMEN 17 data.
Now I don't know the details of the ZWC and I am not speculating whether it could or couldn't get away (noting that it was not legally required to be able to) but it irritates me when people say these things are always awesome on one and thus there is no problem.
Oh - and what type of Kingair are you referring to? My manual says ISA SL 12,500lb 700fpm@121kts OEI feathered, Max continuous, Flaps 0, Gear up.
But is YMEN 17 @ 5128' (5.29%) "suitable"?
I only have an old dusty SuperKingAir 200 Raisbeck HFG manual and it's interesting how marginal it is reading the graphs with YMEN 17 data.
Now I don't know the details of the ZWC and I am not speculating whether it could or couldn't get away (noting that it was not legally required to be able to) but it irritates me when people say these things are always awesome on one and thus there is no problem.
The King Air ... can have a power failure ... and will settle into a climb of circa 130 kts for around 900-1000 ft/min ROC, after raising the gear, and flap passing 400 ft agl.
Last edited by compressor stall; 21st Feb 2017 at 09:59.
if the PIC had successfully carried out just "one" of the following, full power, or gear up, or flap up, or rudder to prevent yaw, or feathered the engine the aircraft would have climbed away, this is inspite being slightly overweight.
You are being ignorantly and unfairly critical of the PIC of VH-AAV, the airplane involved in the 1980 Sydney accident. You mention the accident report, perhaps you should read it - copy available here.
The PIC had retracted the gear, feathered the left prop and flaps were fully retracted at impact; what he failed to do was go to maximum power from the company required limited power take-off setting of 700°C ITT.
So, contrary to your assertion the PIC carried out three of your "just" one" of" actions and the airplane still did not climb away.
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So Max gets denial of justice due to a 2 year delay on an incident report. How can the previous report be fair now that he can't reply or defend himself. Well done ATSB. Your 2 year reports are a disgrace. Another part of the broken Australian aviation system.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with compressorstall, hogsnortrupert. I flew the B200 variant. V1/VR were both 95kts for a flapless takeoff, which was normal per the POH; so no flap retraction required at 400ft. There was no published 2nd segment. Although you'd never do it in the real aircraft, and who knows how good sim fidelity is, the handling charateristics of the B200 on one engine between VR and V2/VYSE were certainly not gentle. Engine failures after V2, like someone else mentioned; you'd hardly notice them if the autofeather and rudder boost worked as advertised. Agree about the climb out potential once at speed.
I used to have these figures written down somewhere when I was flying the things, but the figure of 5% climb gradient, at MTOW, ISA +25, Sea Level, comes to mind.
The B200 is a very capable aircraft when flown accurately on one engine. But, an engine failure at or just above rotate requires some pretty precise flying to get away from the ground safely.
Until one is put in such a position, then I'd be hesitant to say that "he should have been able to fly away on one engine".
RIP to all those onboard.
morno
The B200 is a very capable aircraft when flown accurately on one engine. But, an engine failure at or just above rotate requires some pretty precise flying to get away from the ground safely.
Until one is put in such a position, then I'd be hesitant to say that "he should have been able to fly away on one engine".
RIP to all those onboard.
morno
Morno, pretty close. Also to add it's not just precise flying. It's runway length too.
My accelerate-go graphs show 6800' field length to get to V2 (121kts) at ISA, MTOW etc. Once there you have a climb gradient of a bit under 5% (600fpm).
F40 gives a bit over 5000', but a 3.5% ROC at a lower V2 (106kts)
My accelerate-go graphs show 6800' field length to get to V2 (121kts) at ISA, MTOW etc. Once there you have a climb gradient of a bit under 5% (600fpm).
F40 gives a bit over 5000', but a 3.5% ROC at a lower V2 (106kts)
Hoggs, I get that your emotional so I won't direct any comments your way.
For the others, as not everyone that flies the B200 is a pro; there are private weekend type guys that don't have the training or frequent flying the pros get, they might not be aware of just how savage the B200 power lever slide can be. A four-blader with one at takeoff power and the other at idle is not an ideal place to be.
It can go from takeoff power to idle in the time it takes you to select the gear up and it feels very much like an engine failure. For the inexperienced they can get startled and mis-diagnose what just happened and then handle the situation poorly- humans make mistakes.
But, if someone learns of this potential trap then they will be better prepared if it happens to them.
Once again, I never implied that this was the cause of today's accident.
Barry, Raisebck got FAR 25 performance numbers- initial takeoff with flaps is much better although 2nd segment isn't as good. I much preferred those numbers.
For the others, as not everyone that flies the B200 is a pro; there are private weekend type guys that don't have the training or frequent flying the pros get, they might not be aware of just how savage the B200 power lever slide can be. A four-blader with one at takeoff power and the other at idle is not an ideal place to be.
It can go from takeoff power to idle in the time it takes you to select the gear up and it feels very much like an engine failure. For the inexperienced they can get startled and mis-diagnose what just happened and then handle the situation poorly- humans make mistakes.
But, if someone learns of this potential trap then they will be better prepared if it happens to them.
Once again, I never implied that this was the cause of today's accident.
Barry, Raisebck got FAR 25 performance numbers- initial takeoff with flaps is much better although 2nd segment isn't as good. I much preferred those numbers.