The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

King Air down at Essendon?

Old 25th Feb 2017, 02:02
  #401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,319
Received 174 Likes on 70 Posts
you get airports for peppercorn rates
Brisbane's lease cost $1.4 billion in 1997, thats $2.3 billion in todays money. Hardly peppercorn, and hardly "given it". Did you read the article in the aviation section of Friday's Australian regarding airport funding. The author pointed out it is almost impossible to pay the running costs from purely aviation related activities. No one can afford to run something at a loss for long (except the government, and thats what happened when they did, and that's why they got rid of them). The truth is, in the majority of cases, it is the non-aviation related activities that are subsidising the rest, just to make it work. It seems there are arseclowns on both sides.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 02:31
  #402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,880
Received 362 Likes on 192 Posts
keep the skid ball centered
You sure about that gazumped?
megan is online now  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 03:20
  #403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[I]t is almost impossible to pay the running costs from purely aviation related activities. No one can afford to run something at a loss for long (except the government, and thats what happened when they did, and that's why they got rid of them).
So why doesn't that logic apply to all hospitals, all schools, the defence force, the police forces, ambulance services...

The problem is that the value to the community of these things cannot be measured in the money it costs to run them.

As I said earlier in this thread, the inevitable consequence of not measuring and taking into account the value of an aerodrome to the community is that it must be turned into houses/factories/warehouses/DFOs/fast food outlets. The inevitable consequence. (Unless you can pull off the 40 year right of refusal trick they did in Sydney - milk the monopoly asset for billions and pay not a red cent in tax.)

I say turn 'em all into housing estates/factories/warehouses/DFOs/fast food outlets. Shut 'em all down. It's what the sick, fat, whinging mediocrity that Australia has become wants and therefore deserves.
Creampuff is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 03:29
  #404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 265
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
that video linked to by OttoL does indeed suggest the aircraft was on runway heading but then skidded violently to the left.
Reviewing the video, to me it agrees with what I'd expect to see if the pilot had insufficient room to land ahead and was turning towards/parallel runway 08 for a landing. Unfortunately the empty ground next to 08 is now cheap crap shops and car parks - leaving him nowhere to go.
drpixie is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 03:44
  #405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,319
Received 174 Likes on 70 Posts
So why doesn't that logic apply to all hospitals, all schools, the defence force, the police forces, ambulance services...
But it does. All fiscal black holes, whether federal or state, and all struggling to maintain services (or being stealth privatised in the case of health and education) in the face of reducing budgets and spiralling costs.

The community can see the value of an airport, but only to a point. Most councils maintain their regional strips even though loss making, because they understand the need it fulfills, but they try to minimise those losses. In a city though, the vast majority of people have come to terms with airports as businesses, if they ever thought of them as anything else anyway. They understand, accept and want a Tullamarine, but they probably can't see a need for an Essendon just down the road. So if a place like an Essendon or a Moorabbin is to survive in a sea of ratepayer self interest, it has to survive by other means.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 03:53
  #406 (permalink)  
When you live....
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 0.0221 DME Keyboard
Posts: 982
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
Brisbane's lease cost $1.4 billion in 1997, thats $2.3 billion in todays money. Hardly peppercorn, and hardly "given it".
Nobody forced anyone to sign the lease agreement! I do agree though that the government itself holds the most blame here - in return for that lease, unfettered rights to develop, charge and diversify must have been the nod nod wink wink side of getting anyone signed up.

Current governments are the same - "asset recycling" means exactly the same thing - leases and sales at huge prices are only achievable buy making the new operator able to make a profit by whatever means necessary.
UnderneathTheRadar is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 04:58
  #407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mary meagher, although not a Kingair, this is the RFDS at work.

https://www.facebook.com/royalflying...4456194217252/
fujii is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 04:59
  #408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
www.saveessendonairport.com

Seems this group has come to life again
aujetpilot is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 05:08
  #409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flying doctors..!

Good morning Fujii! quite right, I had no idea that the flying doctors would probably arrive in a costly twin....as I am a very old (and definitely not bold) pilot, in my day when flying half in the US and half in the UK, doctors in the US of A were well known for awkward arrivals in T-tailed Bonanzas, otherwise commonly called "doctor killers".

So Australia is well ahead of most English speaking countries in terms of aviation. Question: these twins listed as being owned by the medics, are they being flown by professional pilots? or by doctors? or are the two qualifications mutually exclusive?
mary meagher is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 05:28
  #410 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 101
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mary meagher- where to begin? I am quite certain that I will not be the only one to respond to your post.

When referring to the RFDS we are not referring to medical doctors who may (or may not) have any piloting skills, thrashing around on the weekend for their personal edification and jollies; rather we are referring to a highly professional flying organisation.

The RFDS employs professional pilots to transport professional medical staff and patients to and fro medical facilities and the GAFA.

The pilots of these "costly" twins (and singles) are generally considered to be the cream of the crop in the aviation world. They have to be to do what they do (no flaming bog-roll, dark-hole approaches for me!).

In short most of us, who know, either aspire to be or are a little jealous of the boys and girls in those "costly" twins.
Bankstown Boy is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 05:44
  #411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: 15km SE of YMML
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@mary,

"The Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (RFDS, informally known as The Flying Doctor) is one of the largest and most comprehensive aeromedical organisations in the world. It provides emergency and primary health care services for those living in rural, remote and regional areas of Australia. It is a not-for-profit organisation which provides health care to people who cannot access a hospital or general practice due to the vast distances of the Outback."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_...e_of_Australia

https://www.flyingdoctor.org.au/
c_coder is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 06:02
  #412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: International
Age: 76
Posts: 1,394
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Tee Emm.

I am pleased you have mentioned this accident that took place off R/W 17 at Essendon on 3 Dec 1993. The DH-104 had a pilot and 9 pax on board for a local flight. There was no baggage.

Just after rotation at 50 ft and 84 kts IAS the right engine lost power and the a/c yawed to the right. The (1500 hours on type, total experience 18,000 hours) experienced pilot then selected gear up only to find nothing happened. He recycled the gear selector and the gear retracted. By this stage the airspeed was well below take-off safety speed. No radio calls were made. The flaps (20 degrees) were not retracted due to the very low airspeed and despite the pilot planning to land in the street the aircraft impacted power lines and ended up bouncing off a number of residential roofs before sliding to the ground. There was no fire and no serious injuries.

Some observations after the accident.

1) From start of take off to the accident approx. 1 minute. No radio calls.

2) In theory the aircraft could have landed back on R/W 17 with about 245 feet to spare.

3) If a flapless take-off had been made the outcome most likely would have been different. (The pilot did not have a chart for a flapless take-off so assumed it was not approved).

Lessons to be learnt.
B772 is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 06:03
  #413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,880
Received 362 Likes on 192 Posts
Thread drift, but to follow up on fujii post.

Some highways have areas set aside for runway usage. In the old days prior the pilot would call a truckie on CB and get him to drive down either side of the highway for a nominated distance and knock down all the timber white posts.



And at night by car head lights. Both PC-12 and King Air, it's all single pilot. Normal crew on our local King Air is pilot plus nurse, and only if the particular case calls for it, a doctor. Book "Australian Midwives" by Paula Heelan is a compendium of tales written by various nurses employed in the EMS fixed wing services. Good yarn.

megan is online now  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 06:39
  #414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Mary. The RFDS has its own professional pilots. It is one of the prized jobs here. The doctors and nurses may get to sit in the right seat on clinic runs or when there are no patients. I read and enjoyed your book.
fujii is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 06:49
  #415 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good morning Fujii! quite right, I had no idea that the flying doctors would probably arrive in a costly twin....as I am a very old (and definitely not bold) pilot, in my day when flying half in the US and half in the UK, doctors in the US of A were well known for awkward arrivals in T-tailed Bonanzas, otherwise commonly called "doctor killers".

So Australia is well ahead of most English speaking countries in terms of aviation. Question: these twins listed as being owned by the medics, are they being flown by professional pilots? or by doctors? or are the two qualifications mutually exclusive?
Hi Mary

I sent you a pm that I hope will explain how the RFDS operates its truly essential aeromedical service for folk Outback.

I'm just about to clock up 73 years and I'm the same age as my aeroplane. We both, the AUSTER and I, do some travelling each year in the GAFA whenever we can get away. It's a magic place and I miss the red dirt country from my younger years very much.

Regards

Kaz
kaz3g is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 07:10
  #416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Next door to the neighbor from hell, who believes in chemtrails!
Age: 75
Posts: 1,806
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Thread drift, but to follow up on fujii post.

Some highways have areas set aside for runway usage. In the old days prior the pilot would call a truckie on CB and get him to drive down either side of the highway for a nominated distance and knock down all the timber white posts.
I seriously doubt they would have called a truckie on the CB radio to knock down the posts. Knocking down the posts would be a job carried out by the police.

DF.
Desert Flower is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 09:31
  #417 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,319
Received 174 Likes on 70 Posts
Nobody forced anyone to sign the lease agreement! .......... nod nod wink wink side of getting anyone signed up.
They would've been negotiating the lease fully aware on both sides it was for a business. I doubt there was much nodding and winking going on.

Anyway, that's enough thread drift.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 09:55
  #418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Thread drift, but to follow up on fujii post.

Some highways have areas set aside for runway usage. In the old days prior the pilot would call a truckie on CB and get him to drive down either side of the highway for a nominated distance and knock down all the timber white posts.
I seriously doubt they would have called a truckie on the CB radio to knock down the posts. Knocking down the posts would be a job carried out by the police.

DF.
What posts? There is a "road airstrip" on the Stuart Highway with nicely marked threshold marks, centre line and no posts through that section. I do have photos of it but can't be ******** setting up a photo-share account to be able to post them here. The police are used to close the highway about 1 km before the thresholds when the strip is going to be used.

On subject and as noticed by another poster, the ATSB is saying this was a private flight. I sincerely hope for all concerned that that is a mistake as it will be blood in the water for lawyers for the passenger families.
PLovett is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 10:37
  #419 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,880
Received 362 Likes on 192 Posts
I seriously doubt they would have called a truckie on the CB radio to knock down the posts
Well, the Kalgoolie ex RFDS pilot I flew with circa 1990 must have been lying.
What posts?
In the old days I said. Back when Chieftains were the go, and there were no sections of road set up as an airstrip..
megan is online now  
Old 25th Feb 2017, 11:54
  #420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those complaining about excessive development in the near-runway areas; please explain to me how this King Air crash would have had a totally different ending if it had pancaked into flat open ground at over 100kts, and full of fuel? Do you really believe everyone on board would have just walked away, if there were no buildings there? Where are the study results that show no development within miles of a runway improves air safety outcomes?

It's a fact of life airports usually start off their lives in a relatively semi-rural region, and development encroaches on them, because people want quick and easy access to the airport.
onetrack is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.