Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Why no full position reports in G and E ?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Why no full position reports in G and E ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Apr 2016, 22:53
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Last time I was entering E at Avalon I still called the Tower and stated my intentions and received a courteous reply. In theory I guess I could just silently blundered through.

Perhaps a mid air with a silent RMIT student* coming the other way and tracking over the aerodrome reference point might have entertained the jetstar passengers waiting to board.

* Oriental RMIT students communication skills leave a lot to be desired in my opinion.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2016, 02:46
  #162 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Sunfish. It was an astute call by you. You converted class E into some type of class D where the ATC had a responsibility to give you a traffic information service and be partially responsible for a potential mid air collision .

And it cost you nothing. As I said , very astute.
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2016, 04:02
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 75 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
And it cost you nothing. As I said , very astute.
Codswallop Dick. Sunfish could have asked for a SIS. Rather odd, don't you think, that the controllers are taking on such a huge risk with this half-wound back system but AsA actually clarified and improved the service, now called a SIS? Crazy! Madness! Rediculous! Well, someone is...
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 27th Apr 2016, 05:26
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capn Bloggs
Rediculous!
I see what you did there!

Dick, you seem to be forgetting one thing about all this. It's called 'duty of care'. Your sudden concern for ATC is heartwarming, but your argument is fatally flawed in the fact that you believe that 'nothing' is inherently safer than 'something'.

And don't worry yourself about the legalities. The phrase 'no REPORTED IFR traffic' (as opposed to 'no traffic') is there for a reason, as is 'observed VFR traffic', 'unverified', 'intentions unknown' etc etc.
Hempy is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2016, 09:33
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,337
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Just as in the huge Bankstown payout ,apportioning blame to the ATCs
Dick, can you provide any links to the above? I can find nothing online except for the accident reports.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2016, 05:04
  #166 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
No I can't but it happened. That's why Civil Air required that VFR helicopters be separated as if IFR.

The cost and waste was staggering.

And Hempy. Not a sudden concern for ATCs. You seem to have forgotten that I was the only one who got on the TV news and supported the B K controllers when they were being unfairly blamed for the runway 29 approach mid air fatality.
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2016, 14:52
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You seem to have forgotten that I was the only one who got on the TV news and supported the B K controllers when they were being unfairly blamed for the runway 29 approach mid air fatality.
Actually, I'm trying to recall the accident to which you are referring to. The Liberty and the 152 in 2008? If so, all we heard from you was;

Originally Posted by Dick Smith
Each plane must go to one of those points to call in. Now, when I've travelled around the world getting advice on air space it's been pointed out to me that no other country does that, because if you bring the planes to a point and it's outside controlled air space, they're very likely to collide there and of course that's what's happened.
I'll give you credit for one thing, you don't change your spots
Hempy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.