Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Plane crash near Albury

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jul 2014, 08:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Next door to the neighbor from hell, who believes in chemtrails!
Age: 75
Posts: 1,808
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Plane crash near Albury

Just heard on the news that a plane went down in the Burrumbuttock area around 5:40PM this afternoon. One feared dead. Anyone know anything more?

DF.
Desert Flower is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2014, 10:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: -28.1494 / 151.943
Age: 68
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Minimum of details so far.
A172
Avgas172 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2014, 10:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Albury
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Albury Incident

Listening to the local news it seems a " light aircraft " came in contact with power lines whilst on decent into a " paddock " ? Pilot deceased, no further report on other pax.
Xray Tango is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2014, 11:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It is believed the aircraft struck powerlines about 5.40pm before coming down in a paddock about 100 metres from the Farmer’s Inn hotel.

A police media spokeswoman confirmed the pilot died.
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2014, 13:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh crap not another one.

Last light 5:47pm.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2014, 23:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Outback Australia
Posts: 397
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Yes, XXX, another one. RIP.


Burrumbuttock pilot killed in light plane crash | Goulburn Post
outnabout is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 06:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATSB held an on site media briefing at 3:30. Two investigators are on site and they are requesting any eye-witnesses come forward.

Single pilot, no witnesses (atm), crash on approach. They may well end up being 100% correct, but unless there is an obvious structural failure in the wreckage that they can't attribute to the impact, I'm pretty sure they wont reconstruct any further than 'pilot error' on this one.

There have been too many people dying lately, it's starting to make me feel a bit sick.
Hempy is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 07:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ._..._...
Posts: 312
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rego was VH-TRS
vee1-rotate is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 10:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: -28.1494 / 151.943
Age: 68
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Investigation number: AO-2014-131


Unfortunately another aviator is no longer with us.
Avgas172 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 10:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Next door to the wrong neighbours
Posts: 243
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like pilot is a local so probably has landed there a hundred times without incident. Very sad for his family and the local residents of Burrumbuttock.
truthinbeer is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 10:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: have I forgotten or am I lost?
Age: 71
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on tonight's telly it was listed as a crop duster crashed near albury.

if VH-TRS is correct it was a cessna 182 registered to Kristen Barr of burrumbuttock
dubbleyew eight is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 10:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
The pilot was reported to have just taken off from his private strip which was .5 kms from the crash site. The engine was reported to have been spluttering and surging as it flew low over houses and properties prior to crashing.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 11:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The registered owner was the pilot. Confirmed on win news.
fixa24 is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2015, 01:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 807
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ATSB report has issued. An accident that need not have happened.


https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/573804...4131_final.pdf
bentleg is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2015, 09:04
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SEQ
Age: 54
Posts: 512
Received 24 Likes on 9 Posts
That makes for uncomfortable reading.

Admittedly a fairly simple accident, but I thought it was a good report, fairly direct and without the verbiage that so often clutters these things.
spinex is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2015, 10:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,469
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
Unhappy Totally stupid waste of a life and a good aeroplane

Sadly this is the third accident report that I have read in the last 18 months that has been a result of pilots doing totally stupid illegal low flying resulting in fatalities.

Low flying without the appropriate training and approvals is absolutely stupid and dangerous, that's why CASA have rules in relation to this activity.

If you accidentally fly below the minimum altitude by 100 feet or maybe 300 feet(?) who cares, and will CASA prosecute you? Probably no, as the evidence generally would be inaccurate in terms of a potential prosecution. However if you collided with something on or attached to the ground, you are going to feel some pain, not only from CASA, but also financially as a result of the damages you have caused (forget about the injuries, you would totally deserve them!) - if you are lucky enough to survive.
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2015, 20:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low flying without the appropriate training and approvals is absolutely stupid and dangerous, that's why CASA have rules in relation to this activity.
so, seeing as this keeps happening, the rules obviously dont work. and no, we dont need more rules, as this has been proven to not be a deterrrant to these actions. we need better training and a better attitude to flying.. until attitudes change towards low level flight, im sure in the not to distant future, there will be another report like this one just with different location and different names..
Ultralights is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2015, 22:21
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
If I'm not mistaken, Raaus are pushing 12 fatalities this year of which *most* were not mechanically induced. It's the season not to be jolly.

It doesn't seem to matter how many rules there are, people will still break them. It's not like there aren't penalties for doing it either. It will take a lot to change it and I'm fresh out of ideas on how you do it quickly or easily.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2015, 23:00
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,469
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
Thumbs down

Rules are in place to keep the honest on the straight and narrow - in a round about way, may not happen all the time though due to mistakes and unintentional errors.

Rules will never prevent stupidity. If one has the intent to carry out a dangerous act, rules mean nothing until the person has to face the music - if they should survive.

Regulators and law enforcement agencies can not regulate for acts of stupidity.......
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2015, 00:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
due to mistakes and unintentional errors
It depends on your definition of the above...

Is formating on and colliding with another aircraft a mistake or unintentional?
Is doing a wingover into cloud and hitting a mountain a mistake?
What about turning back after an engine failure, is that a mistake?
Squawk7700 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.