Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

South Coast aircraft down 6/7/14

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jul 2014, 09:15
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey XXX and Fantome….we were only replying to anthers post….not that far off topic.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2014, 09:23
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Compylot is an imbecile. Read any of his posts & you will deduct this. I wouldn't be congratulating the clown for any thing he writes.

Despite any of the speculation here I have concluded that the instructor on board this flight was a competent & respected aviator.

Anybody with any brains can weed the garbage out from some of the reasoned speculation on threads such as these. If you don't like the comments, don't read the thread or block the poster.
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2014, 10:52
  #63 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,967
Received 92 Likes on 53 Posts
Steady on Jack. You don`t want to be banned again, do ya?

Despite any of the speculation here I have concluded that the instructor on board this flight was a competent & respected aviator.

Anybody with any brains can weed the garbage out from some of the reasoned speculation on threads such as these. If you don't like the comments, don't read the thread or block the poster.
Agreed! Especially with the first paragraph.
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2014, 12:56
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATSB

Creampuff

Your response to my last is baffling to say the least. If I were to post my thoughts I would likely be blocked by the moderators. Suffice to say that if you really believe that the published findings in relation to the fatal accident involving VH-CKS do not offer causes for the accident then I do not know what will. You say they are merely "assertions of fact". It should be obvious that the statements refer to the VH-CKS accident. What more do you wish for?

You, like many others, are not prepared to offer any clue in your public profile as to your qualifications, aviation experience or anything that may inform whether or not you are simply engaging in argumentative comment for arguments sake.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2014, 21:54
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what does the report say caused the accident?

You seem to be suggesting it's "obvious".

Please just cut and paste the cause that you say is stated in the report.
Creampuff is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2014, 23:07
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steady on Jack. You don`t want to be banned again, do ya?
Pinky, read his old posts mate. You won't read bigger drivel anywhere else
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2014, 01:39
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Creampuff Questions

Creampuff, if you are unable to accept that the "Contributing Factors" listed, in the report previously mentioned, amount to stating a cause or causes which led to the accident then I fear your comprehension of the English language is flawed.

Contributing factors means, to me at least, that there was no single cause which led to the final outcome. Multiple contributing factors together led to the accident occurring.

You can post whatever response you like to this reply. One of us is obviously as thick as two bricks and I don't think it is me.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2014, 04:27
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It’s almost certainly me.

I just thought that an important ‘contributing factor’ – maybe even the most important ‘contributing factor - might have been whatever caused the pilot to make the decision to attempt that landing in those circumstances.
Creampuff is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2014, 06:59
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stupidity?
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2014, 08:03
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe.

Maybe not.

The report doesn't state pilot stupidity as a cause (or 'contributing factor').

I haven't met too many pilots that I'd consider stupid.

A decision might look stupid in hindsight, but wouldn't it be more helpful if more energy were focussed on investigating what causes otherwise competent and intelligent people to make a decision that seemed to them to be a good decision at the time?

If the implicit message in all these kinds of reports is "stupid pilot", why bother investigating the accident?
Creampuff is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2014, 08:56
  #71 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,967
Received 92 Likes on 53 Posts
Slight thread drift

You won't read bigger drivel anywhere else
Try reading Hansard!

Back to the thread.
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2014, 02:55
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't met too many of us that are stupid either, that's why most of us are still alive
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2014, 03:45
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know quite a few pilots that I wouldn't consider stupid but who have nonethless perished in accidents while PIC.
Creampuff is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2014, 03:49
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They may have not done anything stupid to perish, this person however, did.
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2014, 09:19
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SEQ
Age: 54
Posts: 512
Received 24 Likes on 9 Posts
I see wreckage and remaining body found this afternoon.
spinex is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2014, 10:14
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based on that Spinex we should quickly hear what went wrong :-(
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2014, 11:13
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 62
Posts: 458
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
South Coast aircraft down 6/7/14

NSW Police have issued a media release advising they have located the missing pilot and aircraft wreckage.

http://m.police.nsw.gov.au/news_media_releases?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJT JGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGMzkyNTYuaH RtbCZhbGw9MQ%3D%3D
roundsounds is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2014, 08:30
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SEQ
Age: 54
Posts: 512
Received 24 Likes on 9 Posts
Based on that Spinex we should quickly hear what went wrong :-(
Let's hope so, I hear that the wreckage is pretty much reduced to kit form though.
spinex is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 05:49
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wherever seniority dictates
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wreckage has been brought to the surface.

Plane crash: Search for answers continues PHOTOS, VIDEO | Bay Post
muffman is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 23:01
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SEQ
Age: 54
Posts: 512
Received 24 Likes on 9 Posts
Pretty sobering photos there muffman, I'd heard via the bush telegraph that the wreck was pretty chopped up, but that's nasty, a lot worse than the Lightwing that went into the water on Victor 1 a few years back. I'm guessing these poor blokes were a bit higher than 500/1,000' when it all went wrong.
spinex is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.