Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Lake Hume ultralight crash. 2 years on...

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Lake Hume ultralight crash. 2 years on...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jan 2014, 22:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern NSW
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lake Hume ultralight crash. 2 years on...

Just curious to know if anyone knows where this investigation is up to? Is it a Police matter? CASA?

It made for some sensational news down this way 2 years ago and was the subject of a pprune thread.

Captured: 'Buzzing' before Hume crash | The Border Mail

and from the Border Mail this time last year...

Lake Hume buzz, crash probe continues | The Border Mail

"AN investigation into an ultralight crash at Lake Hume a year ago still has not been finished.

A Civil Aviation Safety Authority spokesman said it was not known how much longer the probe would take.

Initial separate investigations revealed the ultralight pilot was unlicensed and his plane unregistered."



http://www.pprune.org/pacific-genera...lake-hume.html
YMAYguy is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2014, 10:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YMAY
Age: 75
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lake Hume ultralight crash. 2 years on...

Good question..... How often. Do the news services report these spectacular stories with no follow up? You could always ask the Border Mail Rag for an update.
Saratogapp is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2014, 11:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The media also quoted NSW police as saying that the matter had been referred to CASA.

One would have hoped, based on the allegations, that police would have filed charges independently of CASA for conduct endangering life, etc.

Kaz
kaz3g is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2014, 20:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But the pilot said in the video that he never went below 500ft. Perhaps the qnh changed after takeoff as how do we REALLY know the height of the ground or water below us?
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2014, 20:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sarnia, ON
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CASA are too busy regulating non-issues such as licence labels or Go-Pros to be worried about anything that actually causes crashes.
Volumex is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2014, 21:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So according to CASA, I'm quite welcome to fly around buzzing people at low altitude in an unregistered aircraft, without a license with no problems from them. As long as said unregistered aircraft doesn't have an unapproved GoPro mount

But should I have a single 't' not crossed on my paperwork if I'm an AOC holder... watch out!

Last edited by bankrunner; 2nd Jan 2014 at 22:23. Reason: speeling and gramar
bankrunner is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2014, 01:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
bankrunner........now ya getting the idea

If it were not so serious, it would be funny.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2014, 05:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
But the pilot said in the video that he never went below 500ft.
Not totally honest our man, Lake Hume is slightly above 500ft. Maybe he sunk a bit before rising to get to the 500ft mark.
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2014, 21:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wentworth
Age: 59
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I recall RA Aus went into a "nothing to do with us mode" because the aircraft was not registered/had no reg markings and the pilot was not licensed, and this was followed by a series of four CASA audits, each one failed by RA Aus, which unearthed big numbers of non conforming aircraft, incorrect certification, incorrect approvals, etc and CASA had to step in and set up a procedure where every single aircraft was checked, photos taken and filed, correctly identified by external markings, and in some cases virtually turned into a prohibited import which could never be used.
This process caused a backup in registrations of hundreds of aircraft, with many owners unable to use their aircraft.

Last edited by Wallsofchina; 4th Jan 2014 at 04:20.
Wallsofchina is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2014, 22:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WOC said:

As I recall RA Aus went into a "nothing to do with us mode" because the aircraft was not registered/had to reg markings and the pilot was not licensed, and this was followed by a series of four CASA audits, each one failed by RA Aus, which unearthed big numbers of non conforming aircraft, incorrect certification, incorrect approvals, etc and CASA had to step in and set up a procedure where every single aircraft was checked, photos taken and filed, correctly identified by external markings, and in some cases virtually turned into a prohibited import which could never be used.
This process caused a backup in registrations of hundreds of aircraft, with many owners unable to use their aircraft


I don't quite see the correlation between somebody allegedly breaking the Act and the CARs while behaving in a manner dangerous to the public (evidenced by the photos and video footage that were available at the time) and the audit problems faced by RAAus.

The latter were a disgrace and those in charge are now largely part of a sad history, but they in no way account for or excuse the alleged behaviour which reflects on us all who drive machines that fly.

Kaz
kaz3g is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2014, 02:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
I don't quite see the correlation between somebody allegedly breaking the Act and the CARs while behaving in a manner dangerous to the public (evidenced by the photos and video footage that were available at the time) and the audit problems faced by RAAus.
Kaz, I think what WOC is saying is the all too frequent behavior of CASA which is: If we can't get you for this (dangerous idiot in aeroplane) we will get you for that (full audit). I don't know if that is what happened but I would not be surprised.

The latter were a disgrace and those in charge are now largely part of a sad history, but they in no way account for or excuse the alleged behaviour which reflects on us all who drive machines that fly.
Disgrace is a bit harsh, I am sure those in charge at the time had good intent. CASA are the kings of wanting perfect paperwork. Any AOC holder/chief pilot will agree. Incorrect paperwork does not always mean shoddy business and fortunately CASA know this as well. And sadly, yes, a single halfwit can do a lot of harm which reflects on all of us.
Aussie Bob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.