PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Forgotten your Username/Password?


The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th Jun 2012, 06:25   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 7
NZ CAA Medical charges

Did my medical renewal and doctor mentioned a proposed new levy the CAA is considering for intro later this year. Ap at the moment CAA medical is funded thru airport charges however not for much longer. New system would require us to purchase an approval of sorts costing around $250-300 to then take to doctor who can then do the medical as they do now. This will effectively double the cost of our yearly medical issue or renewal! Anyone got any further info?
NZCPL is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jun 2012, 08:24   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 72
another example of out of control NZCAA, they have groossly overspent in the past and now some wizard thinks it time to catch up at the expense of the good old pilot the one who keeps CAA in business
my advice to NZCAA is get some proper mangement in there not this generation MBAs ( master of bugger Alls ) before it is too late
Three Blader is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jun 2012, 09:11   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 21
MBA=Master of Bogus Acadamia
jimmyconway is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jun 2012, 23:00   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: cloud9
Posts: 323
Having had both NZ CAA Medical and CASA Medical can say this may be the only area CASA may have a (slight) advantage over other systems is medicals. I can remember the complete head Fcuk it was to get a NZ Medical compared to CASA and then the ridiculous charges CAA charged. Was over $400 and that was nearly 10 years ago. I renewed my CASA few months ago and was under $200 including CASA rubber stamp charge.
solowflyer is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jun 2012, 00:47   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 1,122
Quote:
I renewed my CASA few months ago and was under $200 including CASA rubber stamp charge.
Right now in New Zealand there is no CAA rubber stamping charge.

You go to your DME or AMA and complete your medical, if you go to a DME they send your details to an AMA who then assess the data and issues the medical providing everything is in order, or if you go to an AMA everything is completed on the spot without any input from CAA. CAA are just notified of the medical completion/result. Just the way it should be, CAA approve these guys to issue the medicals there's no need for any CAA input.

So far as rubber stamping by CAA/CASA goes this is ridiculous, a parallel would be CAA/CASA approving every single flight for all pilots.

I don't see any need for CAA to be putting their hand out for more money.
27/09 is offline   Reply
Old 22nd Jun 2012, 21:46   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: EnZed
Age: 27
Posts: 141
I heard this as well.
KantGrowHair is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Jun 2012, 08:13   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Someday I will find a place to stop
Posts: 674
O great, so the pilots ARE paying for the new NZCAA building they moved into?
DeltaT is offline   Reply
Old 24th Jun 2012, 08:06   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 1,122
We, that is the industry, us pilots, were going to pay one way or another.
27/09 is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 22:41.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".