PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Forgotten your Username/Password?

The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th Dec 2011, 06:49   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,970
The prop has been known to literally snap off half way out. Believe it was more than one aircraft but I await advice from others on how many times it has actually happened.
VH-XXX is offline   Reply
Old 19th Dec 2011, 09:27   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South of the North Pole
Posts: 217
That would have to have a fairly catastrophic outcome especially if airborne. I'd certainly like to know more. If anyone has info, please share.

Knox.
knox is offline   Reply
Old 19th Dec 2011, 10:34   #23 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: the back of my falcoon
Age: 32
Posts: 111
Quote:
The prop has been known to literally snap off half way out. Believe it was more than one aircraft but I await advice from others on how many times it has actually happened.
People....... let's try to keep in mind GA don't (i'm pretty sure) manufacture the props! The props being most likely bought from either McCaculey or Hartzel!
DanArcher is offline   Reply
Old 19th Dec 2011, 10:37   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 774
Torsionable Vibration ????
T28D is offline   Reply
Old 19th Dec 2011, 10:47   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 42
Posts: 797
GA10

Quote:
Ive investigated and we have upgraded the glue to withstand hotter climates. 2012 model will bring some improvements and more in the pipeline.
Can I suggest a brand name for you..............nah stuff ya, i will :P

Fusor.

In my industry we use a lot of their products in place of OEM glues. One product in particular, 108B, used to glue dissimilar steels has a break strain of 1500 PSI (better than windscreen Eurethane) and it normally out performs that.


What I love about this thread...SFA. Just another case of aussies bagging aussie products! The same aussies that want to tell the world how good we are............i digress.................
jas24zzk is offline   Reply
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 21:18   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Age: 28
Posts: 533
I'm a kiwi
lilflyboy262...2 is offline   Reply
Old 11th Apr 2012, 12:49   #27 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 774
It is probably Torsional Vibration nothing to do with maintenance, it is the way the rotating elements are set up.
T28D is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 00:19   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Pacific
Posts: 652
The Great Australian Cringe makes me sick.

I fly a GA 8 in Alaska and it is one of the best airplanes for that place. Good range, gets into small strips, comfortable, quiet, and the best view for the punters of any airplane I have flown in. I did 4 hours last week in the back and was really impressed with the quiet, smooth, comfortable ride. The view all around was superb, and the scenery spectacular.

But to listen to an Aussie (and I am one, but not a basher of my country like so many) the GA 8 is rubbish.

As if things don't break on a Cessna?
boofhead is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 01:17   #29 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Age: 28
Posts: 533
I totally agree with brian.
I've got over 550hrs in them. As a 23-24yr old, I felt like I was 80 after a hard life of digging ditches and I couldn't feel my ass.
Lack of rudder trim was an issue for me.
And it needed at least another 60hp when at MTOW.
Brakes are worse than useless when heavy braking was required. Your COULD NOT flat spot a airvan tyre.

That being said. Passengers loved them (As long as the flight was less than an hour)
View from the bubble windows was great.
Loading and unloading pax was a breeze and fast turn arounds.
The car seat belts were great for passengers, easy for them to use.
(but the stupid bracket on the top of the seat meant that a change of seats was not easy, nor changing the seat covers if someone threw up on them. Whole seat belt assembly had to come off if I am not mistaken)
Much quieter than other piston counter-parts such as the C206.
Very easy to land & nice light controls.
lilflyboy262...2 is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 02:59   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Centre
Age: 33
Posts: 92
Harley, do you have red hair?
Neville Nobody is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 03:28   #31 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: gas filled self propelled bag
Posts: 106
First flight imminent for GippsAero GA10

Just thought I'd add this as I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet!
Interesting little project, should be a good seller if they get it right. Anyone have any ideas if they have orders already?
zappalin is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 03:33   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,970
Quote:
Harley, do you have red hair?
Given that he works in aviation, if it was red, it is probably grey by now. (no offence intended)
VH-XXX is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 04:22   #33 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Centre
Age: 33
Posts: 92
Quote:
Given that he works in aviation, if it was red, it is probably grey by now. (no offence intended)
I meant no offense as well, just occured to me who Harley is.
Neville Nobody is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 06:41   #34 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,970
Add Sunburn to the sore arse

They are a great machine, great for specific tasks and they do it well. They aren't suited for everyone. A great Aussie product.

All good things in Australia are Great. Great Australian Bite, Great Keppel Island and Great Barrier Reef.

The US have their Grand Caravan, MGM Grand and Grand Canyon
VH-XXX is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 09:35   #35 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South of the North Pole
Posts: 217
I've done a "couple" of hours in GA8 and I must admit it is a seriously UGLY plane but very functional and offers a great financial return for any company running them. Its a real work horse that can take a real thrashing and can make it in and out of most strips. However I still love the C206.

Brian Abraham: I take you were providing additional aft trim by pulling back on the yoke with both hands. Empty Airvanitis.

HarleyD: "Anyone that has been involved in an accident in a GA8 seem quite satisfied with the seats".
I was involved in an accident when I attempted an exit from the "van" after a 2 hour sector, this was due to excessive loss of feeling in legs due to FAR23.562 seating requirement. But in all seriousness my hat is off to you doing a 16 hour stint in the "van".

Knox.

Edit: rudder trim!! Please!!

Last edited by knox; 13th Apr 2012 at 10:33.
knox is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 10:04   #36 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 210
Was very easy/nice to fly but they need to do something about that seat!
717tech is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2012, 13:23   #37 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 42
Posts: 797
Interesting young sherlock...........


Boofa, nice to see someone else agreeing with me on aussies self bashing...i loathe it!. Sure comment on what you don't like, but as we agree, that doesn't make it a dud.

The scarevan (excuse me, i like my nicknames) is enjoying some great success. An operator I spoke to a few years ago was interested, but the lack of turbo option held him back. I'll have to give him a call on his viewpoint now


Seat Design. Is this the biggest criticism? Surely this has gotten back to GA and in time they will address it....they'd be dumb not to....progression of a type is reliant on curing 'gripes'.


As for the seats being FAR XXX compliant....booowaaaa! The seats in your mercedes actually exceed the FAR compliance req, and are ten times more comfortable. I also agree, yes the crashna seats are reasonably comfy, i'd rather the more modern supportive design of the GA item.

Comfort however will come with a weight penalty....you know the bit your boss pays for.
jas24zzk is offline   Reply
Old 2nd May 2012, 03:15   #38 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: melbourne
Age: 64
Posts: 77
jas24zzk seats in the airvan also exceed the FAR requirements - they're rated to 30g allround. Put in a different seat cushion if you don't like the current one.
aeromariner is offline   Reply
Old 2nd May 2012, 03:34   #39 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Age: 28
Posts: 533
Jaz, they were nicknamed the Vomit Comet in Botswana.

They were way too under-powered when its hot and heavy. Couldn't get above the bumps and would end up with sick pax.

Think about it for a second, the GA8 has the same Horsepower as a C206. The airvan was designed to take 2 more pax!
We had a seat out in the rear so we could carry baggage as well as fuel. Put it this way, we could only climb due to the curvature of the earth....
lilflyboy262...2 is offline   Reply
Old 2nd May 2012, 04:00   #40 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Age: 28
Posts: 533
I have a few questions about the GA10 as well.

Looking at the brochure on the Gippsland website... It says the empty weight is estimated to be 2350lbs. With a MTOW of 4450lbs.
Gives you a payload of 2100lbs. 10 occupants at 165lbs each (Standard weight 75kg) is 1650lbs.
That gives you 450lbs for fuel and baggage. Assuming they all bought 20kg, or 44lbs each, thats 440lbs for baggage, leaving 10lbs for fuel....

That engine better be economical.

Next question is, the brochure also says it can carry 500 gallons of fuel. With a 2100lbs payload... well from what I remember in the caravan, 332 gallons is 2244lbs.
How can you carry 500 gallons when that works out to be roughly 3400lbs?

If you want to be carrying around passengers and baggage, I can't see any benefit to this aircraft with those weight restrictions. You'd be better off buying a GA8 and save on maintenance?

This plane is competing with the Cessna Caravan, the Kodiak Quest, and the PAC750 to name a few. All so far can carry a much bigger payload for a slightly higher fuel burn and they can full the seats and fly a decent distance.


Now if this is a typo in the brochure then I can understand!
lilflyboy262...2 is offline   Reply
Reply
 
 
 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network