Which CPL Exam To Start With?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Down Under
Age: 33
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which CPL Exam To Start With?
G'Day I am currently building my hours before I can start my CPL training and I am going to start knocking off the exams one by one.
Will be self studying and I am wondering if anyone has any advice on which exam to start with? I have heard mixed views on starting with Human Factors which I hear is the easiest one (apparently), or to start with the more difficult ones like Aerodynamics.
Any advice would be much appreciated.
Oh I plan on using Bob Taits books anything else worth looking at?
Will be self studying and I am wondering if anyone has any advice on which exam to start with? I have heard mixed views on starting with Human Factors which I hear is the easiest one (apparently), or to start with the more difficult ones like Aerodynamics.
Any advice would be much appreciated.
Oh I plan on using Bob Taits books anything else worth looking at?
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
I don't think it really matters which one you start with, so long as you prepare for each exam well, then just book in your exam and do it..
I'm studying at present for ops/performance and i've only got another few weeks to sit and pass that exam... Should have done it 3 yrs ago when I did the other 6!! hmmm, so maybe you should get that one out of the way 1st!...
Good Luck with them!
I don't think it really matters which one you start with, so long as you prepare for each exam well, then just book in your exam and do it..
I'm studying at present for ops/performance and i've only got another few weeks to sit and pass that exam... Should have done it 3 yrs ago when I did the other 6!! hmmm, so maybe you should get that one out of the way 1st!...
Good Luck with them!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bubba, I did mine in 2002 and they were all done separately then.
D90, as others have said, just start doing them.
HF is the easiest of them, IMHO. Just don't let that be an excuse not to prepare.
Bob Tait is the way to go; no doubt about that!
Good luck!
DIVOSH!
D90, as others have said, just start doing them.
HF is the easiest of them, IMHO. Just don't let that be an excuse not to prepare.
Bob Tait is the way to go; no doubt about that!
Good luck!
DIVOSH!
G'day D90,
Do the required medical first because if you can't pass it there's no point doing the rest.
Many centuries ago, before I started flying, I did a Class I medical, including all the specialist bits, just to make sure there wasn't anything medical that was going to preclude my holding a CPL/ATPL.
Regards,
BH.
Do the required medical first because if you can't pass it there's no point doing the rest.
Many centuries ago, before I started flying, I did a Class I medical, including all the specialist bits, just to make sure there wasn't anything medical that was going to preclude my holding a CPL/ATPL.
Regards,
BH.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: oz
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your looking at doing ATPL's and IREX as well leave CPL human factors for last then sit AHUF the next day, MET too except there is some new content to learn. Do CPL law then IREX then ALAW as the former two make up alot of that exams content. Basicly if you can do them all without big gaps between exams you will find the journey much easier.
Many seem to recomend that you do CPL systems then CPL aerody, as it helps to know how it works before you start looking at how it works from an aerodynamic perspective.
Get into them, stay at it and they will be over before you know it. Good Luck!
Many seem to recomend that you do CPL systems then CPL aerody, as it helps to know how it works before you start looking at how it works from an aerodynamic perspective.
Get into them, stay at it and they will be over before you know it. Good Luck!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On the Dark Side
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bubba,
I remember those days when the CPL was an all in one test, thats how I did the CPL back then, the ATPL was also one test conducted over 2 days...
I think the new system is a better one....
I remember those days when the CPL was an all in one test, thats how I did the CPL back then, the ATPL was also one test conducted over 2 days...
I think the new system is a better one....
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Diversion
I completed CPL theory at the beginning of the year and found personally doing Met, and HF first up as it got the ball rolling for me and gave me the drive and confidence i needed to finish the rest. This comes down to the individual obviously but I think we all need a bit of encouragement as fuel to study.
One other thing, don't rely on BT for all the subjects. If my memory serves me right, Perf. and planning I used ATC and that filled in some gaps that Bob was lacking. His AGK book will suffice and Nav aswell. If you want to pay $40 for a photocopied cut and pasted CARs then buy his AIRLAW book
, but keep an eye out on ebay and you will find them come and go very cheap!
All the best for them mate it's a great feeling once there gones
I completed CPL theory at the beginning of the year and found personally doing Met, and HF first up as it got the ball rolling for me and gave me the drive and confidence i needed to finish the rest. This comes down to the individual obviously but I think we all need a bit of encouragement as fuel to study.
One other thing, don't rely on BT for all the subjects. If my memory serves me right, Perf. and planning I used ATC and that filled in some gaps that Bob was lacking. His AGK book will suffice and Nav aswell. If you want to pay $40 for a photocopied cut and pasted CARs then buy his AIRLAW book
, but keep an eye out on ebay and you will find them come and go very cheap!All the best for them mate it's a great feeling once there gones
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: End of the Earth
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're doing a 150 hr integrated course you better check you meet the flying requirements too. Otherwise, I would only second what SM227 said, do CHUF last, I couldn't tell the difference between that and AHUF.
ID
ID
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Down Under
Age: 33
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the response, I currently have a PPL and am able to start the CPL exams now.
SM227 following up with those couple of ATPL's after sounds like a good option, not sure if I will though as I dont plan on doing an instrument rating for a while.
BulletHead have done the class 1 before I started training.
SM227 following up with those couple of ATPL's after sounds like a good option, not sure if I will though as I dont plan on doing an instrument rating for a while.
BulletHead have done the class 1 before I started training.
Hi Diversion90,
If you're doing 150 hrs syllabus, make sure you read this first:
Since you mentioned you have PPL, I assume you already have 5 hrs PIC x-country time.
I recommend start with MET because CPL MET is 95% identical to PPL MET. If you have PPL already, CPL MET shouldn't take too long to prepare. Difference is CPL MET is heavily based on interpreting weather forecast, so make sure you understand the forecasts at the end of Bob Tait's textbook.
Then, do AirLaw. Some elements mentioned in MET will be covered again in AirLaw, so save you time to study the MET element again. AirLaw also helps you to learn how to find info from AIP, CAO & CAR. These are very important reference for your CPL training.
Then, do Nav. CPL NAV is also very similar to PPL NAV. It covers MET, AirLaw again, so you save a lot of study time. After study Bob Tait's Nav book, I became very confident in using the 1 in 60 during my solo flights.
Then, do AGK and aerody. They're very straight forward and interesting to learn.
Then, when you have plenty time, do Performance. This subject takes a lot of time, normally I can do other subjects in 2 weeks, but with Performance I actually spent 4 weeks. Make sure you spare plenty of time for this one.
Finally, do Human. It's not very difficult and is 99% identical to ATPL Human, so as soon as you have all credit for CPL theory, you can sit the ATPL Human the next day.
Just be careful with Performance, you really need to allow more time for that. Most of my mates under estimate Performance and found time not enough to study this subject. I think Met, Law & Nav are most directly related to your x-country training, so I highly recommend doing them first.
Enjoy your flights! and study......
p.s. If you're doing NVFR, the Aviation theory centre has a very good NVFR textbook. They also have a very nice initial twin-engine textbook!
If you're doing 150 hrs syllabus, make sure you read this first:
http://www.casa.gov.au/fcl/download/vfras01.pdf
(page1-5)
(ii) after accumulating 5 hours pilot in command cross country time, or achieving the competencies of the
PPL (as specified in the PPL Achievement Record)
• Navigation
• Aircraft Operation, Performance and Flight Planning
• Flight Rules and Air Law.
(page1-5)
(ii) after accumulating 5 hours pilot in command cross country time, or achieving the competencies of the
PPL (as specified in the PPL Achievement Record)
• Navigation
• Aircraft Operation, Performance and Flight Planning
• Flight Rules and Air Law.
I recommend start with MET because CPL MET is 95% identical to PPL MET. If you have PPL already, CPL MET shouldn't take too long to prepare. Difference is CPL MET is heavily based on interpreting weather forecast, so make sure you understand the forecasts at the end of Bob Tait's textbook.
Then, do AirLaw. Some elements mentioned in MET will be covered again in AirLaw, so save you time to study the MET element again. AirLaw also helps you to learn how to find info from AIP, CAO & CAR. These are very important reference for your CPL training.
Then, do Nav. CPL NAV is also very similar to PPL NAV. It covers MET, AirLaw again, so you save a lot of study time. After study Bob Tait's Nav book, I became very confident in using the 1 in 60 during my solo flights.
Then, do AGK and aerody. They're very straight forward and interesting to learn.
Then, when you have plenty time, do Performance. This subject takes a lot of time, normally I can do other subjects in 2 weeks, but with Performance I actually spent 4 weeks. Make sure you spare plenty of time for this one.
Finally, do Human. It's not very difficult and is 99% identical to ATPL Human, so as soon as you have all credit for CPL theory, you can sit the ATPL Human the next day.
Just be careful with Performance, you really need to allow more time for that. Most of my mates under estimate Performance and found time not enough to study this subject. I think Met, Law & Nav are most directly related to your x-country training, so I highly recommend doing them first.
Enjoy your flights!
and study......p.s. If you're doing NVFR, the Aviation theory centre has a very good NVFR textbook. They also have a very nice initial twin-engine textbook!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: victoria
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having pased 6 subjects and doing a theory school course,and also reading BT books. Have found that only the basics are in the books. Some of the questions I had in exam are NOT in the BT book or in the ATC book.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: YBBN
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've heard lots of good things about Bob Tait.
Slightly OT, what are his ATPL texts like? Do they contain everything needed to self study?
Slightly OT, what are his ATPL texts like? Do they contain everything needed to self study?
I bought all his CPL books 2 days ago. this topic came up at a very prime time for me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Down Under
Age: 33
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have decided on doing AGK first and picked up Bob Taits AGK book yesterday. I am going to give each exam plenty of time to study for as I am not in a rush to get them done in a short frame of time. Was planning on knocking them over say one a month but will possibly need to do them a bit faster. Time will tell.
Just never let them go till the next day, or before you know it, you'll have one month left till your three year deadline with Performance and Air law to go...
not speaking from experience
j3
not speaking from experience
j3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Also worth while planning the exams around knowledge you'll need at the time. I did AGK first and is probably best done first, as it's practical knowledge. As is CNAV.
The order I'd recommend is
CAGK
CNAV
CFPA
CADA
CMET
CLWA
CHUF
That way, you've left the easy ones to last, letting you start your ATPL's with the easiest first, while they're still in your head. Also allows you to go out hour building, with some practical knowledge such as AGK, NAV and FPA up your sleeve.
The order I'd recommend is
CAGK
CNAV
CFPA
CADA
CMET
CLWA
CHUF
That way, you've left the easy ones to last, letting you start your ATPL's with the easiest first, while they're still in your head. Also allows you to go out hour building, with some practical knowledge such as AGK, NAV and FPA up your sleeve.