PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Forgotten your Username/Password?


The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st Jan 2007, 00:09   #1 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1
FAA CPL to NZ CPL

Dudes of Dudeness,

I have a current FAA IR/CPL and have been looking at converting it to the NZ equivalnet - possibility of moving to NZ. Having read the rules I fall short of the 250hr commercial experience requirement for a straightforward conversion...I exceed all the other requirements. So, I need to do all the exams and pass the flight test. Not sure whether I need to do the x-country training as I have more than the required hrs dual and solo. Has anyone converted a FAA CPL/IR to the NZ equivalent without the 250hrs commercial experience? If so what did you have to do? Currently working on my FAA CFI - will any of that count in NZ?

Ta!
McBabe is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2007, 06:42   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 621
Sorry I can't help with most of your questions. But I can with the last one - will work towards a CFI rating count. Short answer, no. For example, if you've done all your training for a CFI, but not the flight test, you'll have to do it all over again here in NZ (or in any other country for that matter).
Oktas8 is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".