737 and truck collide on taxiway at LAX
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
737 and truck collide on taxiway at LAX
This popped up on the local news
The injured were all in the truck, which tipped over. The aircraft wing was damaged but no injuries reported on board.
Eight people suffered non-life-threatening injuries Saturday when a Boeing 737 passenger jet collided with an airport utility truck on a taxiway at Los Angeles International Airport, authorities said.
The collision happened just before 2:30 p.m. on the taxiway near Runway 25 Right shortly after Aeromexico Flight 642 from Mexico City landed, according to Brian Humphrey of the Los Angeles Fire Department.
The collision happened just before 2:30 p.m. on the taxiway near Runway 25 Right shortly after Aeromexico Flight 642 from Mexico City landed, according to Brian Humphrey of the Los Angeles Fire Department.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was looking at the video, and unless the truck was spun round 180 degrees by the contact, it's facing away from the aircraft which implies that if it was moving it must have crossed in front of the aircraft.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Being in the wrong place at the wrong time .
Going by the video, it looks like the catering truck was eastbound in the vehicle travel lane and crossed the taxiway before coming in contact with AeroMexico. Probably crossed well before the B737 entered the taxiway but had to stop for traffic ahead (probably giving way to a plane on a taxiway further east) not realizing they were encroaching on the taxiway behind.
I Have Control
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North-West England
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was an Ambulift. And the driver was in a hurry. We were there.
Just how often do vehicle drivers airside cause problems? They have little or no appreciation of the impetus of jets. Try taxiing a Heavy and following a Leader vehicle at MAN and you'll soon learn the disparity between wheeled powered vehicles at airports. Their drivers are often clueless. Understandably. They drive cars and lorries. Not jets.
Just how often do vehicle drivers airside cause problems? They have little or no appreciation of the impetus of jets. Try taxiing a Heavy and following a Leader vehicle at MAN and you'll soon learn the disparity between wheeled powered vehicles at airports. Their drivers are often clueless. Understandably. They drive cars and lorries. Not jets.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what is typical taxi speed for a 737 (or a 747 for that matter) when it's out away from obstacles, and what's the typical stopping distance? I appreciate that it's going to vary with the load and will be worse at MTOW.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NV USA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going by the video, it looks like the catering truck was eastbound in the vehicle travel lane and crossed the taxiway before coming in contact with AeroMexico. Probably crossed well before the B737 entered the taxiway but had to stop for traffic ahead (probably giving way to a plane on a taxiway further east) not realizing they were encroaching on the taxiway behind.
Taxiing in LAX is one of my "highest threats", the brief mitigation= both heads outside and on a swivel at all times.
Kewbick
If it's an Ambulift, as stated, then 8 is a perfectly sensible number of people - consider it to be a bus rather than a truck. The passengers will be less mobile or disabled people in the box cabin on the back waiting to be lifted onto aircraft.
If it's an Ambulift, as stated, then 8 is a perfectly sensible number of people - consider it to be a bus rather than a truck. The passengers will be less mobile or disabled people in the box cabin on the back waiting to be lifted onto aircraft.
I Have Control
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North-West England
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apologies, I guess you're right. We were told by our agent that it was an ambulift. On reviewing the newscast, this doesn't look like one.
Looks like a most unnecessary collision. Navigating and Taxying at LAX is demanding enough without trucks cutting across. A/C should have priority at all times. I hope the AeroMexico crew didn't get hauled over the coals.
Looks like a most unnecessary collision. Navigating and Taxying at LAX is demanding enough without trucks cutting across. A/C should have priority at all times. I hope the AeroMexico crew didn't get hauled over the coals.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hope the AeroMexico crew didn't get hauled over the coals.
Last edited by Hotel Tango; 23rd May 2017 at 17:25.
Aviation Herald's take on this accident:
Accident: Aeromexico B738 at Los Angeles on May 20th 2017, ran service truck over
A commenter claims to have worked for the company that operated the truck, and says "... from my experience, the trucks do have seats with seat belts but nobody used them. Also, most of the drivers drove recklessly and were undertrained to be driving on active taxiways. I am not surprised to see this happen."
Accident: Aeromexico B738 at Los Angeles on May 20th 2017, ran service truck over
A commenter claims to have worked for the company that operated the truck, and says "... from my experience, the trucks do have seats with seat belts but nobody used them. Also, most of the drivers drove recklessly and were undertrained to be driving on active taxiways. I am not surprised to see this happen."
Taxiing in LAX is one of my "highest threats", the brief mitigation= both heads outside and on a swivel at all times.
I fly a lot to the US and although the airside driving style is “different” to, say, the UK, LAX is by far the worst place that I’ve been to. Some of the speeds used are such that it’s going to be difficult to stop even if you’re looking out...