Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > North America
Reload this Page >

FAA Seeks $2.75M Penalty for Boeing Quality-control Violations...

North America Still the busiest region for commercial aviation.

FAA Seeks $2.75M Penalty for Boeing Quality-control Violations...

Old 1st Aug 2013, 02:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
FAA Seeks $2.75M Penalty for Boeing Quality-control Violations...

"The FAA is proposing a $2.75 million civil penalty against Boeing for allegedly failing to maintain its commercial airplane quality control system in accordance with approved FAA procedures. In September 2008, Boeing discovered it had been installing nonconforming fasteners on 777s. The following month, the FAA sent Boeing a letter of investigation that requested a response within 20 working days. The FAA alleges that despite repeatedly submitting action plans that set deadlines for the accomplishment of certain corrective actions, Boeing subsequently failed to implement those plans. The OEM implemented a plan to address the fastener issue on Nov. 10, 2010, more than two years after it first learned of the problem. “Manufacturers must make it a priority to identify and correct quality problems in a timely manner,” said FAA Administrator Michael Huerta. Boeing stopped using the nonconforming fasteners after officials discovered the problem. However, some of the underlying manufacturing issues continued to exist until after the corrective action plan was in place. Boeing has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA’s civil penalty letter to respond to the agency."

I wonder if things are going to get worse when they start looking into the 787?

Last edited by Jet Jockey A4; 1st Aug 2013 at 02:30.
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 09:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The FAA throws numbers out all the time. They wanted 13.5 million from Boeing this spring for not having a program in place to keep fuel tanks from exploding. They wanted 164 mill from American this spring , they got 24. They wanted 10 from Southwest 5 years ago, they got 7.5.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 24th May 2016, 04:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, things have gotten much worse. In fact, the FAA should pull Boeings PC for habitual fraud in their quality assurance responsibilities. No fine the FAA can level will get compliance at Boeing. The FAA will never do what is required, however, because they hope to get hired by Boeing for services rendered after minimal time at the FAA.
The Last Inspector is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 20:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last Inspector, looks like you might be new around here? You realize that there is little confidentialy on PPRune should the offended party decide to ask who wrote that piece. It has happened in the past and will probably happen again. Accusing Boeing and the FAA of fraud is sort of like kicking the sleeping dog. If you have proof of these claims, you should talking to the FBI and not making them on some web site that is well known for rumors.

Last edited by Spooky 2; 29th May 2016 at 01:02.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 08:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have no reason to fear "exposure." I have already paid the price for my whistleblowing on FAA/Boeing fraud. You are right. I am not the best at getting out the truth. And your FBI comment is well taken.

The Last Inspector - A Site Detailing Boeing's and the FAA's "Working Together" Fraud Negating Your Safety - The Last Inspector's Blog
The Last Inspector is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 14:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's quite a story. i will be watching to see how that plays out and yes, I have heard other similar stories regarding the 737 production.
Spooky 2 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.