PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Rest of the World & Non-English Language Forums > North America
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

North America Still the busiest region for commercial aviation.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th August 2008, 09:08   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 636
Soldiers pay bag fee on travel to war

Washington Times - Soldiers pay bag fee on travel to war
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Soldiers pay bag fee on travel to war
Audrey Hudson (Contact)

American Airlines is charging troops for their extra baggage, a practice that forces soldiers heading for a war zone in Iraq to try to get reimbursement from the military. One of the country's largest veterans groups is asking the aviation industry to drop the practice immediately.

American, which recently charged two soldiers from Texas $100 and $300 for their extra duffel bags, said it gives the military a break on the cost for excess luggage and that the soldiers who incur the fees are reimbursed.

"Because the soldiers don't pay a dime, our waiver of the fees amounts to a discount to the military, not a discount to soldiers," said Tim Wagner, spokesman for American Airlines. "Soldiers should not have to pay a penny of it."
For full article click on link above...
__________________
Weasil
weasil is offline   Reply
Old 14th August 2008, 13:56   #2 (permalink)
SNS3Guppy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,485
I saw that on the news yesterday. I'm disgusted.

Of course, I rode to work yesterday on US Air, and was fairly disgusted at them charging two dollars for a cup of water, too.

This nickle and diming the customer is garbage. Everybody in earshot had the same thing to say about US Air, the treatment, the fees, and the service...last time they'll fly there.

They might be saving a dollar here or there, but I've never seen the ticket counters that quiet before. They'd have to try very hard to be any more effective at driving the customers away.

This business about charging soldiers for their bags. Someone ought to be shot over that. What a disgrace.

SNS3Guppy is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2008, 21:47   #3 (permalink)
OFBSLF
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: US
Posts: 436
That didn't take long. A little nationwide coverage and American Airlines re-evaluated their policy:

American gives in, waives 3rd-bag fee for military | Business | Star-Telegram.com

Quote:
American gives in, waives 3rd-bag fee for military
By Trebor Banstetter

Fort Worth Star-Telegram

FORT WORTH, Texas — Facing a public-relations nightmare, American Airlines said it would waive fees on excess baggage checked by soldiers traveling on duty, after being excoriated online and in the media as unpatriotic and hostile to U.S. troops.

American had been criticized for weeks in often-incorrect reports on blogs and Internet forums that it had begun slapping fees on Iraq-bound soldiers for checking extra bags of military gear. This week, the story hit the mainstream, with reports in national media outlets such as CNN.

OFBSLF is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Soldiers Need Loans to eat ORAC Military Aircrew 45 24th June 2008 20:00
TA to expel soldiers who won’t go to war FormerFlake Military Aircrew 55 18th May 2008 02:47
Gurkha Soldiers Cornerstone958 Military Aircrew 14 10th April 2008 16:28
What do we expect from our soldiers? Cheerio Jet Blast 114 3rd November 2006 01:28
Soldiers or Killers? AOG-YYZ Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) 1 14th September 2001 22:56


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".