Cessna 310 down Los Angeles area
Thread Starter
Cessna 310 down Los Angeles area
Crashed short of John Wayne Airport (SNA) onto south bound Interstate 405 in Santa Ana, California. Pilot and passenger injured.
South and North bound I-405 closed for a time.
Small Plane Crashes on 405 Freeway Near John Wayne Airport; 2 Hospitalized | KTLA
South and North bound I-405 closed for a time.
Small Plane Crashes on 405 Freeway Near John Wayne Airport; 2 Hospitalized | KTLA
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good example of rolling into failed engine
We all know this happens, but here's a great example of a 310 with a failed right engine and the resulting roll into same. The pilot got the wings level before the impact and both souls on board survived despite the fire.
Video Shows Small Plane Crash Onto Busy California Freeway and Burn - NBC News
Video Shows Small Plane Crash Onto Busy California Freeway and Burn - NBC News
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: netherlands
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt that had anything to do with it. He rolled quite fast back to wingslevel. He just did not have enough energy to make it to the runway. Not enough power set or available on the remaining engine?
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Orbit
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
agree, the remaining "climb" performance on those light twins usually sucks, even when your doing everything right, especially on a hot day like yesterday.
His descent rate just before impact looks like it was very high, wonder why.
His descent rate just before impact looks like it was very high, wonder why.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The right propeller is not visible inflight, suggesting that it was not feathered. The video is very grainy however.
EFATO is very unforgiving of inaction/ delayed action in a piston twin.
With one fully operative engine at sea level it should have been able to fly away once feathered and cleaned up.
Did the proximity of the airport tempt an abbreviated procedure?
EFATO is very unforgiving of inaction/ delayed action in a piston twin.
With one fully operative engine at sea level it should have been able to fly away once feathered and cleaned up.
Did the proximity of the airport tempt an abbreviated procedure?
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All I can deduce is that they took off on either 20L or 20R and, to crash on the 405, must have almost completed a very tight right-hand circuit back onto 20R. The aircraft is still in the turn lining up with the runway at the start of the clip. It does show up very briefly on FR24 for a second or two indicating 300 feet.
Stand to be "corrected"
I recall several studies which conclude that engine out in a light twin is a good deal more likely to be a fatal than in a single....not sure if that is across the performance envelope. I think this guy almost succeeded at doing something that is not recommended, return to runway after TO and loss of engine.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EFATO is very unforgiving of inaction/ delayed action in a piston twin.
If the prop is left windmilling for just a few seconds after engine failure after lift off (in other words the pilot is slow to feather it), then due to excessive drag a crash is almost inevitable. Depending on altitude at time of engine failure there may be no time to go through an unnecessarily lengthy identification process before feathering it
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Arizona
Age: 77
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He almost made it back to the runway. Crashed on the runway center line near an approach light.
In some photos, you can see that #5 cylinder on the right engine seems to be missing some parts.
In some photos, you can see that #5 cylinder on the right engine seems to be missing some parts.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My question is do those studies account for the engine failures in light twins which aren't reported, because the flight concluded successfully? If so how do they count unreported engine failures? If not, then the studies really don't accurately reflect the actual difference in the dangers of an engine failure in a twin vs single.
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My question is do those studies account for the engine failures in light twins which aren't reported, because the flight concluded successfully?
J Mac's article from 2003 is worth reading:
Wrong Worry in Twins Versus Singles | Flying Magazine
TL;DR: piston twins aren't less (or more) safe than singles
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apparently lost the engine at 1500' and unable to maintain height. Airplane was under control but the pattern flown for the return was taken out further than was desirable. During a turn, the rate of descent increased resulting in more lost altitude. Possibly could have made it back if a turn toward the airport had been made earlier.
Told to me by a pilot that flies at that airport. Subject to confirmation.
Told to me by a pilot that flies at that airport. Subject to confirmation.