Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

"Muslim" Countries Refuse RAF Overflights

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

"Muslim" Countries Refuse RAF Overflights

Old 26th Feb 2003, 09:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Muslim Countries Refuse RAF Overflights

Radio 4 reported this morning that the RAF were unable to get their aircraft to the party because 'Muslim countries opposed to war with Iraq had refused overflight rights'.

Does anybody know if this is both Egypt and Saudi?

Will the French be next?
soddim is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2003, 09:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southern england
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as reported by the BBC

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2799779.stm

The use of the expression "Muslim Countries" is interesting. Does that mean that all the citizens are Muslim? Not, of course, likely to further alienate those who think the war is against Islam rather than Iraq!

I wonder how they would describe India?

newswatcher is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2003, 11:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The use of the expression 'to the party' is also interesting.

SoS
Speed of Sound is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2003, 15:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as a matter of interest, how did the Americans get their aircraft there?

I wouldn't have thought S.Arabia would have been the main obstacle; if you're flying from the UK to Kuwait, the main two would be Jordan and Iraq (Turkey wouldn't object, being a NATO member, although the recent hoo-ha with Turkey might have been a factor?)
akerosid is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2003, 16:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like the name "Soddim" isn't a clue?
Gordinho is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2003, 17:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As I'm sure many of you are aware, most of the other heads of state in the ME will not be sad to see 'im go BUT they walk a fine line avoiding upsetting their subjects and paying lip-service to regional solidarity; not to mention not wishing to be seen falling in line with Israel's greatest ally.
I'd expect there's a fair bit of diplomacy taking place as we type.
Basil is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2003, 18:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't believe everything you read in the paper, or hear on the radio (even if it is the BBC), either.
ferris is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.