Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Bottom Feeder or Good Guy

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Bottom Feeder or Good Guy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Dec 2021, 22:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Paphos, 8101
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bottom Feeder or Good Guy

Any minute now expect the whole hierarchy to erupt into tears. Some of the loved ones that actually add nothing, but bottom feed without pride, will be rewarded, whilst at the same time those that deserve recognition and more will not stand out against them.
it’s a divisive time, when the very worst stand out as frauds whilst the very best stand as equals to those absolute oxygen thieves. Let’s see, but if you believe the system is sound, you are part of the problem that we live with.
popeye107 is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2021, 22:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Overseas
Posts: 446
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
...must be NY Honours time!
LateArmLive is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2021, 23:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Ibstock
Posts: 66
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I can remember an award given to a WO from Kinloss, 1990, for valuable service in the air prior to GW1. He hadn’t flown, and he knew Fk All about the equipment. So, any real warrior in the air is no better than that, a false system of rewarding ‘our pals’. Shame, as if you police things they hold value.
Countdown begins is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2021, 23:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,047
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Originally Posted by popeye107
Any minute now expect the whole hierarchy to erupt into tears. Some of the loved ones that actually add nothing, but bottom feed without pride, will be rewarded, whilst at the same time those that deserve recognition and more will not stand out against them.
it’s a divisive time, when the very worst stand out as frauds whilst the very best stand as equals to those absolute oxygen thieves. Let’s see, but if you believe the system is sound, you are part of the problem that we live with.

totally and utterly agree.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2022, 00:11
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Paphos, 8101
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An Asshole Conglomerate

To be recognised along with Tony Blair, hero of multiple military needless deaths (RMP no ammunition) is about the worst taint there is.
some brave and worthwhile colleagues are going to lose their shine over this. Not the butt loving HQ heroes that are still 6 years away from a Weapon Handling Test, ‘The Award Parasites’.
popeye107 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2022, 00:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,336
Received 81 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by popeye107
Haha,
let’s see the chiselled from the airlift, and the offices that worked very very hard. Branch and Trade must be due a financial award for their sterling work!
Don’t forget that things like the Op PITTING airlift and other operational excellence will be picked up in the Operational Honours in March/October of each year. These things take time too, so I doubt PITTING will make March (it might, just!) and so I’m expecting to see some RAF names on that list in Oct 22.

Commendations are the ones that are odd to me - having had a 2-star’s and 3-stars’ in the past. Other nations issue a little pin badge to wear on your uniform (a bit like McDonalds stars!), to recognise those that have been commended. Even our RAAF, RCAF and RNZAF cousins in similar uniforms do that and it means a bit more than a certificate that sits in a drawer at home, or even worse the ‘I love me’ wall in the downstairs lavvy! You also mention financial reward - sometimes you are better off getting a Stn Cdr’s Commendation as that normally comes with a £20-£50 gift token compared to nothing with a 2-star, 3-star or 4-star Commendation!!!

If I were Chief for the day, I would get the Commendation System sorted and make sure that we recognise and say ‘thank you’ to those that don’t get a major award. I would also push for a change back to the AFC given for meritorious service rather than just ‘exemplary gallantry whilst flying in peacetime’ - that retrospective step was made in 1993 that should be reversed.

Anyway, you are right, there are some good names to be seen on the list that I am pleased to see - but then there are some absolute shockers too!!!
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2022, 09:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,464
Received 364 Likes on 213 Posts
"I'm not asking for much , just something simple - a small badge - perhaps the words HE GAVE THAT OTHERS MIGHT LIVE"

The Blood Donor
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2022, 06:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Popeye - Tony Blair's award is a personal one from the Queen herself, someone who has seen more PMs than she could shake a stick at. What does that tell you?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2022, 08:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Popeye - Tony Blair's award is a personal one from the Queen herself, someone who has seen more PMs than she could shake a stick at. What does that tell you?
It tells me that dementia is setting in.
ZH875 is online now  
Old 2nd Jan 2022, 08:27
  #10 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
Bliar’s KG is par for the course for ex-PMs since they stopped giving them Earldoms. I think HM shows her opinion with some subtlety; Call-Me-Tony had to wait 14 years for his, Heath I think was longer than that. Wilson however - anecdotally HM’s favourite - got his immediately on retirement.

And it opens the door - God help us - for subsequent PMs, as they have to get the awards in order of serving I think. So stand by for Broon, Cameron, May and (I’ll bet that’ll be a long wait) even BoJo.

But, as crab@ rightly says, it’s in the personal gift of the sovereign, so maybe Charles III (or possibly George VII if you believe the rumours) will change the plan…..

[Edited to add:]

Just looked up Grocer Heath - he waited 18 years!
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2022, 08:44
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
I suppose Corbin will get the ‘Order of Lenin’.
dctyke is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2022, 18:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,287
Received 718 Likes on 252 Posts
The honours system stinks. I only ever put one man up [MBE]. Approved all the way up by Met. Office and RAF. Scuppered by rationing because Falklands intervened.
Always refused to touch the system thereafter. Much easier to get the good'uns rapid promotion, and it puts bread on the table.

On a lighter note [hopefully] I read that:
"Jason and Laura Kenny become knight and dame in sport’s New Year honours"

YES BUT.
Laura is married to a sir, so becomes Lady.

If I met her, and grovelled suitably, how should I address her?

And is the double "ladyship" unique, or unusual?
langleybaston is online now  
Old 2nd Jan 2022, 18:26
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
The honours system stinks. I only ever put one man up [MBE]. Approved all the way up by Met. Office and RAF. Scuppered by rationing because Falklands intervened.
Always refused to touch the system thereafter. Much easier to get the good'uns rapid promotion, and it puts bread on the table.

On a lighter note [hopefully] I read that:
"Jason and Laura Kenny become knight and dame in sport’s New Year honours"

YES BUT.
Laura is married to a sir, so becomes Lady.

If I met her, and grovelled suitably, how should I address her?

And is the double "ladyship" unique, or unusual?
Bearing in mind that knights' wives were originally known as "Dames", coupled with the fact that a present day knight's wife's first name does not form part of her title, I'm going to guess that "Dame Laura" will be her preferred form of address.

Turning to LB's second point, there are many peers' wives who are or were Dames, such as the two Ladies-in-Waiting to HM The Queen who have sadly died lately, and I suspect that there are several baronets or knights whose wives hold or held damehoods. One notable example of the latter. was of course Dame Pattie Menzies, wife of Sir Robert Menzies KT, the former Prime Minister of Australia.

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2022, 19:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sussex
Posts: 141
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Best news from the honours list, Jason and Laura Kenny being ennobled. Sickened to hear about Bliar.
farefield is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2022, 21:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,287
Received 718 Likes on 252 Posts
Ref B Liar:

my wife said "he must know something we don't know"

Yes. He knew he was lying.
langleybaston is online now  
Old 3rd Jan 2022, 08:26
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Yes. He knew he was lying.
No different to Boris then? Only TB didn't prorogue Parliament or lie to HMTQ and the democratic vote to join the coalition and invade Iraq was by a huge margin - far bigger than Brexit.

Shock Horror - politician doesn't tell the truth.........
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2022, 12:24
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
No different to Boris then? Only TB didn't prorogue Parliament or lie to HMTQ and the democratic vote to join the coalition and invade Iraq was by a huge margin - far bigger than Brexit.

Shock Horror - politician doesn't tell the truth.........
412 MPs voted for That HM Government should use all means necessary to ensure the disarmament of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. ( out of 659) 18 March 2003.

544 MPs voted for the Referendum Act 2015 out of 650.

498 MPs voted for A50 Feb 2017 out of 650 MPs.


The Nip is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2022, 12:49
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
"412 MPs voted for That HM Government should use all means necessary to ensure the disarmament of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. ( out of 659) 18 March 2003"

And how was Parliament led in to supporting that decision ?


"The ex-Prime Minister has long faced criticism for sending troops into Afghanistan and Iraq, a decision which culminated in a devastating report by Sir John Chilcot in 2016 which found he overplayed evidence about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. " (DM)
Haraka is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2022, 14:03
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
He was following the USA - not saying he was right to do that but I suspect he was under a lot of pressure to conform. economic and political.

Who made the strong case in the US that started the move to invade? ISTR it was Colin Powell.

Nip - a very different position to vote against the 'will of the people' no wonder they all jumped on board with Boris.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2022, 14:28
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
He was following the USA - not saying he was right to do that but I suspect he was under a lot of pressure to conform. economic and political.

Who made the strong case in the US that started the move to invade? ISTR it was Colin Powell.

Nip - a very different position to vote against the 'will of the people' no wonder they all jumped on board with Boris.
Maybe I misunderstood your point. But the votes, by MPs, for Iraq action was a smaller number than those MPs who voted for the two major Brexit Acts.
The Nip is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.