Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Two A-10s & one other aircraft lost out of Nellis

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Two A-10s & one other aircraft lost out of Nellis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Sep 2017, 18:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
Is the reported loss of the two A-10s connected?
There is no suggestion that the two are connected.
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2017, 11:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,577
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Fatal Nevada Crash Involved Foreign Aircraft Type 11 Sep 2017 Guy Norris
"...Sources indicate Schultz was the Red Hats squadron commander at the time of his death. The Red Hats became an unnumbered unit within the Detachment 3, AFTC test wing after the 413th flight test squadron (formerly 6513th test squadron) was deactivated in 2004. Over recent years the unit has operated a variety of Russian-developed combat types, including the MiG-29 and several Sukhoi-developed models such as the Su-27P, one of which was recently observed flying in the vicinity...." Fatal Nevada Crash Involved Foreign Aircraft Type | Defense content from Aviation Week
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2017, 18:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,184
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
I'm pretty reliably informed that (unusually) Av Week got this wrong, and that Schultz was not a Red Hat or Red Eagle, and that the aircraft involved was not a MiG or a Sukhoi.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2017, 18:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Jacko, no offence but hmmmm
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2017, 19:04
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,184
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
No offence taken. I believe the source of the Av Week story was P**** M*****, who has said it's speculation.

Last edited by Jackonicko; 14th Sep 2017 at 11:37.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2017, 20:23
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bevo here is a former skipper of the Red Hats, he's kindly nudged some of my speculation about earlier black work mishaps in the right direction.

Originally Posted by West Coast
How long did it take before the truth was known on the type of aircraft Gen Bond was flying?

Watch this space is a decade or so for an update.
Originally Posted by Ewan Whosearmy
The Air Force authorised a 'leak' that it was a MiG-23 within weeks of Bond's death.
And, over three decades later it is thought that the leak about General Bond's MiG-23 crash was put out when rumors of his earlier ride in a still unacknowledged F-117 started to emerge.

Here's a contemporary 1984 news report on speculation surrounding General Bond's mishap:

The Pentagon has declined to comment officially on the accident, other than to say that the victim, Lieut. Gen. Robert M. Bond, vice commander of the Air Force Systems Command, was killed while flying ''an Air Force specially modified test craft.''

The accident occurred on the Nellis Air Force Range, part of a wasteland that also encompasses the Government's underground nuclear testing field. It is the headquarters for a number of secret programs. One is the Stealth project, which seeks to develop materials and shapes that will make weapons less detectable by hostile radar.

Weapons Acquired and Tested

Pentagon sources initially denied news reports that General Bond, who was 54 years old, was flying a plane involved in the Stealth project. The Air Force is known to be developing designs for a radar-evading strategic bomber and a jet fighter, but no complete models are thought to exist yet.

Nellis is also the home of a longstanding program to evaluate Soviet weapons acquired covertly or on the world arms market. Knowledgeable sources in Congress, the Defense Department and the military industry said all the military services maintained projects to test such weaponry. After the 1967 war between Israel and Egypt, there was a huge influx of Soviet arms for testing purposes.
GENERAL KILLED IN NEVADA CRASH FLEW SOVIET JET - NYTimes.com

The Have Blue stealth prototypes had been flying since 1977 when this article was written.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2017, 20:38
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
And, over three decades later it is thought that the leak about General Bond's MiG-23 crash was put out when rumors of his earlier ride in a still unacknowledged F-117 started to emerge.
You've lost me.

You said "come back in a decade" to find out what happened.

I said, "no one had to wait a decade for the a/c Bond was flying to be revealed".

The Las Vegas Journal (?) ran a story about Bond being killed in a stealth fighter the day after his death was announced. it isn't "thought" that this prompted the leak, it is known that it did.
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2017, 20:40
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Jacko

Without confirming your reference to who you think AvWeek's source is, I know he/she does not want to be identified in public.
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2017, 20:45
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba

The Have Blue stealth prototypes had been flying since 1977 when this article was written.
No they hadn't. HAVE BLUE flew between '77 and '78. SENIOR TREND entered service in 1983. Bond was killed in April 1984.
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2017, 21:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ewan Whosearmy
You've lost me.

You said "come back in a decade" to find out what happened.

I said, "no one had to wait a decade for the a/c Bond was flying to be revealed".
Huh, I never said come back in a decade, I think you are getting confused again.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2017, 23:49
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
It was me, and Ewan, you take things far too seriously.
West Coast is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2017, 01:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,145
Received 99 Likes on 54 Posts
RIP 'Doc'

Has anyone seen this off the aviationist site?

https://theaviationist.com/2017/09/0...some-theories/

cheers
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 14th Sep 2017, 11:25
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,707
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
The last manned 'black' program to be revealed to the public was the Bird of Prey in 2002 (last flew 1999). No-one surely believes there haven't been others since then.
Davef68 is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2017, 11:38
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,184
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Ewan Whosearmy
Jacko

Without confirming your reference to who you think AvWeek's source is, I know he/she does not want to be identified in public.
Ever helpful, me.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2017, 12:01
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
Huh, I never said come back in a decade, I think you are getting confused again.
My bad, Airbubba. Now I see it
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2017, 12:49
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,061
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by chopper2004
RIP 'Doc'

Has anyone seen this off the aviationist site?

https://theaviationist.com/2017/09/0...some-theories/

cheers

So the Aviationist surmises 4-5 possibilities:
- Su-27 specifically, or foreign
- F-117
- B-21
- Black program, such as the spotted "boomerang"


The article further states that a true black program may be unlikely to fly during daylight (crash time @6pm local), but some indeed did.


I tend to lean foreign or black. Seems too early for a B-21 technology demonstrator or prototype. A F-117 could be explained as a loss during flyable storage validation. Black and Foreign tend to stay pretty quiet. And yes as Dave68 suggests, there have likely been several other programs since Bird of Prey.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2017, 15:17
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: NOYFB
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know, another intrusion from the civil side, but thought you might want to read this:

Report Claims Famed Russian Test Pilot Warned USAF Pilot Before Fatal Crash Near Area 51 - The Drive

In case anyone is fluent, the original piece is here:-

https://govoritmoskva.ru/news/134796/

Have no prior knowledge of Radio Moscow, so not sure how reliable they are, or whether they deal with black propaganda/alternative facts.
OMG Itz Fulovstarz is offline  
Old 9th May 2022, 08:57
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 9th May 2022, 15:59
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,061
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Thank you for sharing that Ewan, seems like a very plausible explanation about what happened to Doc Shultz in the Su-27 out at Area 51. I know the engineers and riggers do their very best to keep those foreign assets flying with scarce resources, references and spare parts. Salute to those that have maintained and strapped themselves to Soviet era equipment over the decades. Fascinating history.
sandiego89 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.