Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Pilot from CVN77 who shot down the Syrian SU-22

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Pilot from CVN77 who shot down the Syrian SU-22

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Aug 2017, 14:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by glad rag
It's what he does.
We can always count on glad rag to attempt a personal dig.
KenV is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 14:59
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stilton
So carriers really pay off when you lose the war KenV ?!
Gotta love it....."Lose the war." FYI, there was no war in the Phillipines and not a shot was fired when the US lost its largest oversees airbase with the stroke of a pen.
KenV is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 16:15
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,062
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
I do find it amusing Ken that folks so often forget that an airfield can be "lost" due to politics, and often limitations with the number and type of aircraft that can be on deck in certain nations. We have to play this game constantly even now, even in countries with fairly open basing rights.






Beside the Philippines, there used to be basing rights, or even essentially US bases, in places like Libya, France, Morroco, Viet Nam, Thailand etc. operating under the graces of the host nation. Others may recall the challenges of operating in places Turkey, certain Stans, Allied Force limitations, Equador, recent Iraq, etc. And it's not just a US thing- our UK friends may recall a few places that used to be under the crown that the UK military routinely operated from, but have been "lost".
I can think of few countries that would allow such a diverse and heavy contingent as we see in Kandahar- and as I recall Afghanistan didn't get much say in the initial vote.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 16:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,264
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
Gotta love it....."Lose the war." FYI, there was no war in the Phillipines and not a shot was fired when the US lost its largest oversees airbase with the stroke of a pen.
I think Mt. Pinatubo may have had something to do with it!
212man is online now  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 16:52
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 415 Likes on 258 Posts
Nope.

Mount Aquino. The volcano was a coincidence. The Philippine government had been making moves for some years to disinvite the US once Marcos was gone. President Aquino was in charge when the formal process was agreed and began.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 17:38
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
I do find it amusing Ken that folks so often forget that an airfield can be "lost" due to politics
Couple that with not having access to host nation facilities to begin with yet still having tasking in the area. Suddenly several acres of sovereign floating territory looks awfully useful even if the ops tempo can't match a land base.
West Coast is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2017, 03:04
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
Gotta love it....."Lose the war." FYI, there was no war in the Phillipines and not a shot was fired when the US lost its largest oversees airbase with the stroke of a pen.
I was referring to the US losing the war in Vietnam, as you were.
stilton is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2017, 09:52
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,158
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
May I ask, of those "dets flying combat ops", how many stayed in Kandahar for 7 months at a stretch? My guess is none. How many stayed in Kandahar three months at a stretch? Two months? I really don't know.

I can't speak for other nations/aircraft, but the RAF roulement was 4 months for the Tornado. It was my experience from 20 years of ops in the desert that the USAF kept their people out there longer, much longer.


I agree, Kandahar would not be much use if the war was in the Far East.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 17:19
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by just another jocky
I agree, Kandahar would not be much use if the war was in the Far East.
How much use was Kandahar when the war was in "nearby" Syria?! How many bombs were dropped on Syria by Kandahar based aircraft? If Kandahar's claim to fame is its "efficiency", just how "efficient" was and is Kandahar in supporting ops in Syria?

Make no mistake, we need bases like Kandahar and they are a tremendous resource. Just don't use the "efficiency" and the "hardness" of bases like Kandahar to justify getting rid of "inefficient" and "soft" carriers. That's just foolish.
KenV is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 17:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stilton
I was referring to the US losing the war in Vietnam, as you were.
Oh my. I wrote:
Essentially every US land airbase in Vietnam was "taken out" with the stroke of a pen in 1973. The same thing happened to all the US airbases in the Phillipines in 1991.

Please read what I wrote, not what you imagine/wish I wrote. And by the way, those are but two examples among many.

And finally, we did not lose those Vietnam airbases because we "lost" the war. We "lost" those airbases because we signed a peace treaty with North Vietnam. Google "Paris Peace Accords". That peace treaty ended the war. It is true that North Vietnam subsequently abrogated that treaty and successfully invaded South Vietnam. So if anything, that "second" war was "lost" because the US had "lost" all those airbases with a previous stroke of a pen and not the other way around as you claim.
KenV is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 22:44
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
We can always count on glad rag to attempt a personal dig.
Well it IS your calling card Oh My....
glad rag is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 23:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Grid ref confused
Age: 63
Posts: 827
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
When I t’were a lad, we’d win t’war before it started, lick flight deck clean wi t'tongues before breakfast, spend 70 years in t’military before we could join up and fly, take off before t’runway were built, drop bombs bigger than whar aircraft, get home arter tea and before medals and light webber first time to barbeque reconstituted meat in rain. Tell that t’servicemen of today and they jest wor’nt believe ya!
cynicalint is online now  
Old 5th Aug 2017, 08:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
... shot down a Syrian Su-22 “Fitter”. The Soviet-era aircraft had been bombing US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces ...
How dare anybody bomb Al Qaeda / ISIS and all their friendly head hackers.

So when war is over will all these people be welcomed into the US ?
racedo is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2017, 16:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 415 Likes on 258 Posts
@cynicalint
Yeah, but we really had it tough ...
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2017, 15:34
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here's an excellent Tyler Rogoway article with details on the shootdown from LCDR Tremel and the other crewmembers from a panel discussion at the infamous Tailhook Association convention:

Here's The Definitive Account Of The Syrian Su-22 Shoot Down From The Pilots Themselves

We finally get the whole story straight from the Super Hornet and Hornet pilots who were there.

By Tyler Rogoway

September 14, 2017

The Tailhook Association's annual symposium wrapped up on Sunday and the event featured a special panel this year—the quartet of Hornet and Super Hornet pilots who were involved in the mission that resulted in the shooting down of a Syrian Su-22 Fitter. Their detailed account of the historic mission provides by far the most concise and thorough picture of not just the engagement itself, but what came before it and after. It also offers some unique insights into the complex air war over Syria.

Below is a summary and some of the takeaways based on the combined accounts of not just Lt. Cmdr. Michael "Mob" Tremel who shot down the Syrian Fitter, but also of his wingman from VFA-87 "Golden Warriors" and two pilots who flew a section of F/A-18Cs belonging to VFA-37 "Bulls" who were in the air alongside them during the mission.
Here's The Definitive Account Of The Syrian Su-22 Shoot Down From The Pilots Themselves - The Drive

Video of the panel presentation here:

https://livestream.com/wab/tailhook2...deos/162478715
Airbubba is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2017, 17:31
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 46 Posts
Seven minute excerpt of the TAILHOOK 2017 video about the Su-22 shoot down:

SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2017, 18:45
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,062
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Good links. Seems to dismiss the earlier talk that the AIM-9X was spoofed with flares.


Ohh, the Oceana Air show is on this weekend (16-17 September) in my neck of the woods. I wonder if "302" will be on prominent display in the static park. I'll keep my eyes open.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2017, 12:28
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 46 Posts
Because the original video will be gone at some point here it is again - all 47 minutes of it.

SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2017, 12:34
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sandiego89
Good links. Seems to dismiss the earlier talk that the AIM-9X was spoofed with flares.
The secrets in the seeker
glad rag is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2017, 20:19
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Video of the Su-22 shoot down.

The second clip is an F-15E Strike Eagle shooting down an Iranian made Shaheed 129 drone over Syria on 20th June 2017.

TEEEJ is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.