Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

High altitude SAM avoidance

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

High altitude SAM avoidance

Old 23rd Feb 2017, 05:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
High altitude SAM avoidance

Hi all,

Geek question.

If your on a high level bomb run, well above MANPAD and AAA ceilings, and you get a warning of SAM's shooting at the formation would you dive into the low level threat environment or stay above it and try to evade?

Assume you have been briefed that the enemy has numerous advanced MANPAD's and AAA but their long range SAM's are a bit out of date? (Think SA-6)

TIA
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 06:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 322
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guess it depends how high is 'high'; giving that most missiles are going to be coming up at you at around 3-4000 mph, I reckon they will probably beat you to low level.
Aynayda Pizaqvick is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 06:36
  #3 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It would also depend on the missile's ability to manoeuvre. I believe against an SA2 the best technique was to turn in to the missile but that is only a vague memory. Back in the 60s the aim was break tracking rather than avoid the missile and execute horizontal turns.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 07:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dubai
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Defeat the current threat before worrying about the next potential one.

The previous generation of aircraft had to descend to deliver the level of performance necessary to defeat or generate miss distance. I expect the current generation are more able to sustain altitude to do the same.

Add Jamming / Stealth etc and maybe the scenario is less relevant. There is a good video out there of an F16 evading multiple SAM launches during GW1. I am sure someone will have a link.

Adour
Adour is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 08:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,545
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Not really a threat in the AD environment but I think the advice "back in the day" (From what came out of Vietnam and the likes of the F4 in that environment ) was above all keep,the missile in sight, do a manoeuvre ASAP to see if the thing was actually guiding on you, wait, and then at the last moment break hard into the SAM.....(as PN said).

In this day and age......no idea.
wiggy is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 09:22
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies all.
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 10:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many years back when flying a GR1 over Iraq (Op Southern Watch) there was a microwave telecoms transmitter around Basra which had a nasty habit of coming up on the RWR as something like SAM6 tracking. I should add Iraq in those days did still have some SAMs.

We got an RWR alert close to Basra and I threw the mighty GR1 (8:6 fit) into a level burner break to the right which lasted all of 90 degrees before the airspeed was down by about 50kts! Since I could see no smoke and the RWR had quietened down I re joined the chaps wondering what was the point in a level break anyhoo?
Bigpants is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 10:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 350/3 Compton
Age: 76
Posts: 777
Received 352 Likes on 86 Posts
[QUOTE=ExRAFRadar;9685002]Hi all,

Geek question.

If your on a high level bomb run, well above MANPAD and AAA ceilings, and you get a warning of SAM's shooting at the formation would you dive into the low level threat environment or stay above it and try to evade?

Assume you have been briefed that the enemy has numerous advanced MANPAD's and AAA but their long range SAM's are a bit out of date? (Think SA-6)

Managed to out-climb 2 X Roland in '82 when I was caught out trying to splash a low-level Pucara over Stanley. Luckily had a thrust/wt ratio approaching 1 and an eagle-eyed winger!
Mogwi is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 11:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
You use the appropriate tactical manoeuvre, hopefully honed during representative EW training, with countermeasures at the required points. If your manoeuvre robs more energy than your aircraft can make up then yes, you end up lower for the next shot. Rinse and repeat until at tree-top height. It can be quite exciting, especially when the large tanks you have pickled-off decide to say hello again as you evade ever downwards.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 18:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adour wrote

There is a good video out there of an F16 evading multiple SAM launches during GW1. I am sure someone will have a link.
TEEEJ is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.