Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Masters of the Air

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Masters of the Air

Old 22nd Feb 2017, 17:23
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 858
Received 33 Likes on 16 Posts
I'll bite.

U-571...
Saintsman is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 17:36
  #22 (permalink)  
Danny42C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think Heathrow Harry (#19) has the right of it.

There was no "silver bullet". The Third Reich collapsed under the combined weight of all the force which the Allies had brought to bear over the years.

As I've said somewhere: "if our generation did nothing else, it put that monster down under the crossroads with a stake through its heart".

There was nothing special about us, we were just the ones on duty when the job came up. You, our grandchildren, would do just as well if something like it came along again (and yet might)......God forbid !

Danny.

Last edited by Danny42C; 22nd Feb 2017 at 17:38. Reason: Addn.
 
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 18:10
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you. Saintsman. There are a lot of people on here who seem to suffer collective amnesia when they get on a collective slagging-off spree even though they know full well what I was referring to as it has frequently attracted lengthy posts from my point of view in the past.
The less pleasant side of internet herd-bullying behaviour.
noflynomore is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 18:48
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The late David Balme, who took the Enigma and code books off U-110, gave an evening lecture at the Yacht Club of which he was a Member and I was Secretary. At the end he, with permission showed a trailer of the then soon to be released "U-571", with the addition of the postscript that he had requested the producers to include, to the effect that the movie was a work of fiction, based on the exploits of the then Sub Lt Balme and the crew of his ship.
Wander00 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 19:33
  #25 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
sandiego, the key phrase is "complete rewrite of history". The film U-571 was one such, I quote from Wiki:

German submarine U-571 was a Type VIIC U-boat built for the Nazi Germany's Kriegsmarine for service during World War II. U-571 conducted eleven war patrols, sinking seven ships totalling 47,169 gross register tons (GRT), and damaging one other, which displaced 11,394 tons. On 28 January 1944 she was attacked by an Australian-crewed Sunderland aircraft from No. 461 Squadron RAAF west of Ireland and was destroyed by depth charges. All hands were lost.
The fictional 2000 U.S. war film U-571 has no relation to this U-boat, but is very loosely based on the British capture of U-110 and her Enigma and cipher keys.


That is the sort of film that gets many others a bad name. There are of course many other films that are not fiction. Perhaps the best Allied film was The Longest Day. Other single nation films like Battle of the Bulge, Bridge at Remagen, Patton attracted no such criticism.

Of modern films I happened across The Fury the other day. A remarkable film featuring little, if any, music, and excellent CGI. Seeing the effect of an AP round hitting a tank and heating the armour to white hot was amazing and none of the usual Hollywood slow explosions.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 20:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Grid ref confused
Age: 63
Posts: 795
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
One film that always agitated my father, who was a pilot on the Dakota Force on 194 Sqn in 1944 at places such as Kohima and Imphal, was ‘Objective Burma’ starring Errol Flynn. My Father always referred to it as ‘Errol Flynn winning the war in Burma single handedly’.

To quote Wikipedia:
Even though it was based on the exploits of Merrill's Marauders, Objective Burma was withdrawn from release in the United Kingdom after it infuriated British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and drew protests about the Americanization of an almost entirely British, Indian and Commonwealth conflict. An editorial in The Times said:
It is essential both for the enemy and the Allies to understand how it came about that the war was won ... nations should know and appreciate the efforts other countries than their own made to the common cause.

I wonder what Danny 42 thinks of ‘Objective Burma’ having also been there and was he as bothered as Churchill and others?
cynicalint is online now  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 21:22
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 103
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Don't forget what I consider the most fictitious military film of all times, "Top Gun". The movie was, and continues to be, a huge hit. I had the great honor to have graduated twice from Fighter Weapons School ("Top Gun" is simply the squadron call sign); once when flying the F-8 Crusader and later on when flying the F-14 Tomcat. Thrilling though some of the scenes may be, there is nearly nothing authentic about the film, especially the behavior of the main characters.

It's a shame really, because filming the actual truth might have made an even better movie from a civilian point of view. From the point of view of someone who was there, "Top Gun" is cringe worthy and even embarrassing.
Mozella is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 21:39
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,344
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
I'll bite. U-571.
Good ripping yarn - it's a movie, not a documentary. As mentioned, there was an acknowledgement of the actual events. It deservedly won awards for its sound - which was superb.
I'm ex-kipper fleet, btw - as was my Dad who was based in Iceland during the Battle of the Atlantic.
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 21:39
  #29 (permalink)  
Danny42C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
cynicalint,

Remember it well, my reaction was exactly the same as that of your Father. The distortion of the facts was so extreme as to be ridiculous.

Glad to hear of Churchill's objections, think it was only after I came back in '46 that I saw it in the UK. Wiki tells me that it was originally released in January, 1945, when I was in Burma with a war that still had another seven months to run.

Danny42C.
 
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 21:54
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Near where the Wokkas live.
Age: 79
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As one who's been interested in the strategic air offensive against Germany for many years I find it rather sad that discussions of it often degenerate into slagging off the contributions of one side or another. Remember that the bomber crews were all volunteers fighting a type of warfare that had never been tried before and tactics had to be made up as they went along. I for one look forward to "Masters of the Air" or whatever it will be called and hope it is as good as "Band of Brothers".
I have read that RAF Bomber Command had the second highest proportion of casualties of any force in WW2 and the US 8th AF was not far behind. The "honour" of having the highest proportion of casualties in WW2 belongs to the German U-Boat Fleet.

Polecat
polecat2 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 22:18
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,832
Received 71 Likes on 27 Posts
I thought the "Masters of the Air" name was changed to "The Mighty Eighth" a few years ago?
So it would seem:
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2015/...illion-budget/
MightyGem is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 22:24
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: birmingham
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some posters anger is misplaced. Don't blame the American film industry in Hollywood for making films about their forces exploits and contributions instead wonder why we cannot make anything which shows our deeds in warfare in this country. The modern British ( 80s onwards ) film makers show no inclination to show our young men and women in a good light in any conflict in the 20th or 21st C.
They might ask one of these people if they ever come across one of them 'why not ? All films seem to be about the multi culti world they inhabit in London or dubious 'romances or comedies ' ( I use these terms in the vaguest sense). Mostly god awful tripe with no appeal to the rest of us.
Hollywood understands that the Patriotic USA wants films about their people in war, the luvvies over here don't.
westernhero is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 22:56
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
The modern British ( 80s onwards ) film makers show no inclination to show our young men and women in a good light in any conflict in the 20th or 21st C.
Which is why I much prefer the products of an earlier age such as The Cruel Sea, Ice Cold in Alex, Dunkirk, and many more.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 23:48
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saigon SGN/VVTS
Posts: 6,625
Received 58 Likes on 42 Posts
A VVSO I once met ...
HH,

Was that the same VVSO who agreed with your comments about a certain Allied tank? Do tell!
India Four Two is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 23:48
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I wonder if they will touch on the 'over sexed ,over paid and over here' part of their stay?
Why not? It is the 21st Century...and sex sells.
Carbon Bootprint is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 23:48
  #36 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
It's almost as if Hollywood films are targeted at a wide cross-section of society and are simplified and popularized to gain the largest share of box-office profits possible. Sometimes I suspect that these movies are not aimed at discerning war-historians like us at all!
Two's in is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 02:22
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the workshop, Prune-whispering.
Age: 71
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Did somebody call?

Master Aircrew Ping (Retd.)
PingDit is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 04:04
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,881
Received 362 Likes on 192 Posts
I've often thought that once the B17, P51 and Glenn Miller were in the UK
Herod, don't forget the P-51 was as much British as it was USA. Developed to fill a Brit requirement and paid for with Brit cold hard cash. The name "Mustang" was even a Brit bestowal. Initially the US had very little interest in the aircraft, the two aircraft given to the US languished on the USAAF test flight line.
megan is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 07:08
  #39 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Yes, Hollywood makes films that their audiences wish to see to make money.

As TTN says, we older citizens like the gritty war films from the 50s and 60s. In Hollywood's rush to the cash they still produce turkeys and dross - Pearl Harbour.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 07:16
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Herod, don't forget the P-51 was as much British as it was USA. Developed to fill a Brit requirement and paid for with Brit cold hard cash. The name "Mustang" was even a Brit bestowal. Initially the US had very little interest in the aircraft, the two aircraft given to the US languished on the USAAF test flight line.
There's a reasonable amount of evidence to suggest that the decision to put a Merlin engine into the P-51 actually happened at the AFDU at the then RAF Duxford
Treble one is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.