Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Flight Suits

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Flight Suits

Old 31st Aug 2016, 18:05
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,155
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
JAJ.wimp in the meatbox, 39k, depressurised, No 2 trousers, blue shirt and tie under flying suit, ditto 300 ft low level.

Seriously, flown 3 hr low level in Malaysia, cabin temp about 70. We each drank about 4 pints of squash and did not per afterwards. OAT post flight was 35 and we were all shivering. Main criteria was to get the flying suits off, strip off the cottonseed and rejoin the human race.

The short answer is few aircraft/AEA are suitable for climate control and survival.

Most modern aircraft have air conditioning, it's only the cheap end of aircraft design that have the issue; a hole in the front leading to a hole in the cockpit is all you get with hot air outside being ducted onto you.


Inflexible rules forcing folk to get overly heated....it's not big and it's not clever.


War stories eh? GW1 and a few years afterwards, the Mighty Fin could manage no more than 10 minutes on the ground with air con ON. Factor in around 30 mins to start up with canopy down throughout, another 15-20 to taxi (big airfields, again with canopy down) then a possible wait to get airborne and in the undiluted sun and 50+ degree C OAT, one was a tad sweaty before one got airborne!
just another jocky is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 18:13
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not a lot changed from the cold air unit in the B Mk 2 Canberra
Wander00 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 18:51
  #43 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
JAJ, I was only joking. At least the tents were a big improvement over the Canberra' s bonnet.

BTW we took part in the liquid cooled suits for the Tonka. The suit was tight fitting woven nylon. You had to carry a portable cooling pack from the time of donning until plugging in to the aircraft. There were some
evolutions that were impossible while carrying the handbag or moving around the cabin. Had you had to bail out, stripping off the suit on landing would have been the first priority. I have no idea how it would fare in water. Of course it never came in to Service.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 20:37
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,155
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontious Navigator
JAJ, I was only joking.

I know.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 20:57
  #45 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I bet FlyingSpanner wished he hadn't asked
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2016, 06:25
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
Merlin crews had liquid cooled underwear for the sandpit, they were okay until the cooling pack broke down... Also seem to remember looking after a cooling vest on the wonder jet, like the inflateable socks I don't recall pilots ever using them..
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2016, 00:30
  #47 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Age: 41
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the contrary... This thread has been fantastic! Thanks for all the info. FYI I ended up with a new, old stock mk14A.
Flyingspanner83 is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2016, 06:24
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,155
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Does anybody like the new American-style suits?
just another jocky is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2016, 09:17
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Shackman
I think the last non-nomex flying suit was the Mk 7 lightweight suit for tropical climes. I had 2 in FEAF - they were great as no matter how much you perspired, as soon as you landed it was straight under the shower and then leave it on the hangar in the locker room and it was dry in next to no time.
Looking in my 'collection', the Mk 10 was my lightweight suit and is (for Nomex) a very thin fabric. Whereas my Mk 11 is the winter-weight and very definitely Nomex, so I'd be fascinated to know what the Mk 10 is actually made of.

Anyone?

Yes, sad how much still clutters up the spare wardrobes
John Eacott is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2016, 15:14
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by just another jocky
Does anybody like the new American-style suits?
They are far more effective in terms of fire protection, being made from a higher quality material than the last issue. The neck area is offered much more protection. No issues wearing them in the UK at all.

That said, they are dreadful in hot climates with no sign of a thinner, desert variant on the horizon.
Pure Pursuit is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2016, 15:21
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
My original 1968-issue 'Suits, Flying, Mk9' is a heavy grade grey (cotton?) item, whereas my final 'Coverall Aircrew Mk14A' is NATO green and is (I think) made from Nomex?

But why is it that they've shrunk so much after being stuffed into a wardrobe for several years?
BEagle is online now  
Old 27th Nov 2016, 15:43
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,963
Received 68 Likes on 26 Posts
Strange, my one remaining green bag seems a little tighter around the waist than it used to.......
beamer is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2016, 16:28
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 3 Posts
Have you noticed that flying boots and footwear in general don't shrink as much as other clothing in the wardrobe?
WIDN62 is online now  
Old 4th Dec 2016, 22:49
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: moraira,spain-Norfolk, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seeing this thread made me realise I still have my
"suit flying mk7a lightweight". Any interest to
anyone ? Pity to dispose of it.
esa-aardvark is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2016, 08:31
  #55 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
ESA, short answer yes.

EBay would certainly shift it. All my stuff went that way except I kept the flying suits. Threw a green one, circa 1990 away a couple of months back. The extra padding with the thigh pockets certainly work when the chain saw touched them.

Got a new 16 on eBay, great for diy and gardening shoving tools in etc.
Pontius Navigator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.