Squadrons re-equipping/renumbering/standing up and down - what actually happens?
Thread Starter
Squadrons re-equipping/renumbering/standing up and down - what actually happens?
Bit of a daft admin question, but when reading various squadron histories both offline and off, I'm often told that "X Sqn exchanged its Jaguars for Tornados" or "Y Sqn was re-formed on <date> by renumbering Z Sqn". But what actually happens in the real world to physical assets, human or otherwise?
With squadron "renumbering", I take it that all personnel and airframes stay in place, and it's a "simple" case of laying down standards, (because I'm guessing their current numberplate is getting mothballed at best) and receiving new ones, and some rapid repainting of aircraft, sewing of new patches, relocation of trophies etc.? So a station visitor coming back after a month would see the same airframes and personnel in the same hangar, just dressed a bit differently?
Does "X Sqn exchanged its <oldtype> for <newtype>" actually mean that an existing, or brand new, squadron was renumbered as X Sqn? If a brand new type, would the squadron-sized unit being built from the ground up have had a squadron numberplate of its own temporarily or a different designation? Or did X Sqn go through a lengthy conversion phase, with personnel rotated through the relevant OCU until the transformation was complete?
Thanks for any information or personal anecdotes - it just intrigues me from a historical point of view.
With squadron "renumbering", I take it that all personnel and airframes stay in place, and it's a "simple" case of laying down standards, (because I'm guessing their current numberplate is getting mothballed at best) and receiving new ones, and some rapid repainting of aircraft, sewing of new patches, relocation of trophies etc.? So a station visitor coming back after a month would see the same airframes and personnel in the same hangar, just dressed a bit differently?
Does "X Sqn exchanged its <oldtype> for <newtype>" actually mean that an existing, or brand new, squadron was renumbered as X Sqn? If a brand new type, would the squadron-sized unit being built from the ground up have had a squadron numberplate of its own temporarily or a different designation? Or did X Sqn go through a lengthy conversion phase, with personnel rotated through the relevant OCU until the transformation was complete?
Thanks for any information or personal anecdotes - it just intrigues me from a historical point of view.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,786
Received 129 Likes
on
58 Posts
Well, swapping Velcro patches and re-painting aircraft, hangars and offices is one path
Otherwise crews will have worked up on the new type and be posted in to operate the new aircraft (as will the Eng staff).
After that, I defer to those who have experienced the transition.
Otherwise crews will have worked up on the new type and be posted in to operate the new aircraft (as will the Eng staff).
After that, I defer to those who have experienced the transition.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Old crews absorbed by other same-type sqns. Some posted to different roles, others to the OCU for the new type.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I was on 43 as we transitioned from Phantoms to Tornados. As I recall faces gradually disappeared in the months leading up and new faces appeared with some of the old ones gradually reappearing.
The Phantoms went and there was a few months lull as we got the new kit in and re-vamped the Sqn ready for the Tornados.
The Phantoms went and there was a few months lull as we got the new kit in and re-vamped the Sqn ready for the Tornados.
Rebadging doesn't happen that often these days on operational squadrons - the re-appearance of 12 Squadron being a notable exception - but has been quite common on Reserve squadrons as more senior numberplates were disbanded as operational squadrons (e.g. 4 Squadron replaced 20 as the Harrier OCU, then 19 at Valley)
Rebadging doesn't happen that often these days on operational squadrons - the re-appearance of 12 Squadron being a notable exception - but has been quite common on Reserve squadrons as more senior numberplates were disbanded as operational squadrons (e.g. 4 Squadron replaced 20 as the Harrier OCU, then 19 at Valley)
It was noted that the units required to renumber resented the move - their previous squadron had its own heritage, identity and ethos and the Air Ministry had, in their eyes, told them that this was less important than maintaining the existence of a more senior numberplate (using a seniority system which, as Jeff Jefford has noted, had various flaws). This was felt to have had a temporary affect on morale and possibly squadron efficiency.
There were - understandably - negative reactions from veterans of the squadrons which disappeared. This all led to the view that squadrons should not be renumbered unless it was considered important for this to happen and no other means of perpetuating a very senior numberplate could be used to achieve this goal.
OCU numberplates were not subject to the policy about seniority, hence renumbering was not an issue; reserve numberplates were (and IIRC, technically are) deemed not to exist until activated for operations. The rule has been awfully confused since ministerial interference after 1991 to ensure that the Sec of State could fend off questions about the disbandment of XV, 16 and 20 under Options for Change and service in Granby by saying that they had changed roles rather than been disbanded...
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the feedback - slowly getting my head around the fact that squadron numbers can jump about rather than being carried on by rolling replacement!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,457
Received 2,593 Likes
on
1,098 Posts
The closing down mob have a parade, wrap the Standard ( Sqn Flag ) up and drink what's left of the teabar funds, the reforming mob have a parade, unwrap the Standard and start to generate teabar funds to pay for their closing down party.
You do get the odd anomaly, I watched our squadron ( 20 Sqn ) disband and have the parade through the wire fence on QRA, and although the Squadron had gone, the aircraft and several of us were still on task and we finished some days after the rest of the Squadron had disbanded.
You do get the odd anomaly, I watched our squadron ( 20 Sqn ) disband and have the parade through the wire fence on QRA, and although the Squadron had gone, the aircraft and several of us were still on task and we finished some days after the rest of the Squadron had disbanded.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: moraira,spain-Norfolk, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Evalu8ter, your post reminds me of a friend of my family. Had been MT at West Raynham,
was sent to Suez in that adventure. Seems strange to me. Sadly I never asked him why.
No chance now.
was sent to Suez in that adventure. Seems strange to me. Sadly I never asked him why.
No chance now.
If you want to understand the subject area, and get the chance to do so, I'd suggest getting a copy of Jeff Jefford's RAF Squadrons: A Comprehensive Record of the Movement and Equipment of All RAF Squadrons and Their Antecedents Since 1912; it explains this all very, very well.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
we've all forgotten the most important bit
the Ceremonial Posting on Pprune
Act1 - "it is a conspiracy by SO's from other squadrons to choose this squadron for the chop"
Act 2 "this is the best squadron in the world"
Act 3 "We'll be back!"
Act 4 "anyone for a reunion ?"
the Ceremonial Posting on Pprune
Act1 - "it is a conspiracy by SO's from other squadrons to choose this squadron for the chop"
Act 2 "this is the best squadron in the world"
Act 3 "We'll be back!"
Act 4 "anyone for a reunion ?"