Plane guard for the QE2 carriers?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Surrey, UK
Age: 70
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Plane guard for the QE2 carriers?
Please forgive me if this topic has already been discussed. Whilst taking a trip down memory lane and watching some DVDs of "proper" RN carrier operations, it's impossible to miss the ever present Wessex undertaking plane guard duties. This has led me to thinking what is likely to undertake this role on board the new carriers? For as I understand things already there's not really enough Merlins or Wildcats to cover present and future tasks let alone this extra one.
Last edited by 163627; 30th Apr 2016 at 13:32. Reason: Spelling error
I suspect that one of two things will happen.
First, a rotary wing asset from amongst the helicopters on board will be on standby but not necessarily airborne during flying ops or second, an assessment of the risk of losing an aircraft is judged so small that the requirement has been discounted.
The third option is, of course, until you posted your query nobody had thought to address the matter!!!!!!!!!!!
Old Duffer
First, a rotary wing asset from amongst the helicopters on board will be on standby but not necessarily airborne during flying ops or second, an assessment of the risk of losing an aircraft is judged so small that the requirement has been discounted.
The third option is, of course, until you posted your query nobody had thought to address the matter!!!!!!!!!!!
Old Duffer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Plane guard
This set me thinking, always a bad idea, do I remember an aircraft sitting on the sea with a helo six feet above and a hairy mech bashing the canopy with a monster spanner? No use the aircraft sank and the pilot with it. I wonder how that happd. A long time ago maybe the 50's
I think the Buc had an underwater facility and maybe the Vixen too but with all electric aircraft could it happen again? I did a 360 tour and I recall the naval aviators saying the drill was to stay with it, wait for the ship to go over the top and then eject. I suppose with an angled deck the waiting would not be needed
I think the Buc had an underwater facility and maybe the Vixen too but with all electric aircraft could it happen again? I did a 360 tour and I recall the naval aviators saying the drill was to stay with it, wait for the ship to go over the top and then eject. I suppose with an angled deck the waiting would not be needed
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,766
Received 2,755 Likes
on
1,172 Posts
The film link is here, beware it shows it all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg0Jj-2x5rM
Someone on here I think mentioned the helicopter was possibly a problem, as the pilot probably couldn't eject from it even if he wanted to due to the helicopter hovering overhead as he sank.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg0Jj-2x5rM
Someone on here I think mentioned the helicopter was possibly a problem, as the pilot probably couldn't eject from it even if he wanted to due to the helicopter hovering overhead as he sank.
Last edited by NutLoose; 30th Apr 2016 at 18:27.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
From the vid it looked as if the plane guard only went on top after things became impossible.
What happened on the Invincible class?
Maybe not needed for the F35 as it is too expensive to ditch.
What happened on the Invincible class?
Maybe not needed for the F35 as it is too expensive to ditch.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,766
Received 2,755 Likes
on
1,172 Posts
Did they have canopy ejection?
Plane guard for the QE2 carriers?
Don't mention HAV and an Airlander derivative!
(On a more serious note I think we have been around the underwater ejection saga before. I remember posting reference to the Gannet "Pop-up seat" some time ago: Also Lt. Nicholas Mcfarlane (sp?.) and his escape from a Wyvern after going under the hull of the carrier- as documented in Eagle Annual 7 :don't knock it!).
Last edited by Haraka; 30th Apr 2016 at 19:29.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They haven't had a rotary wing waiting off for 40 years. Why start soon? They were doing 10+ SHAR/GR recoveries 20< years ago on CVS without a helo off the quarter. They have the dedicated FRC to pick them up and that should really suffice for a single seater.
Always thought the Wessex was entirely too close and in the wrong place anyway in the olden days.
Always thought the Wessex was entirely too close and in the wrong place anyway in the olden days.
Launch had planeguard check the aircraft on the cat from the port side for last minute issues, impossible from anywhere on board. It was well placed to be of immediate assistance should the crew eject. Recovery would be from the port wait, again able to check from the port side any issues unable to be seen from on deck. Returning helicopters would join the port wait outboard of planeguard ready to recover.
Should planeuard be reintroduced for the new carriers then it shouldn't be too difficult to task either a Merlin from the onboard squadron or create a ship's flight for the task along with all the stuff that the CVA ship's flight used to do.
Join Date: Jun 1996
Location: Check with Ops
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F35B is just a fancy Harrier, as far as launch and recovery are concerned. No cats and no traps. A plane guard wasn't required, nor present, for the SHAR so why would it be so for the Lightning?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,766
Received 2,755 Likes
on
1,172 Posts
I have been reading some fascinating tales of late and some things surprised me about boaty things, like pumping oil onto the sea to help stabilise and increase buoyancy of a sinking ship, and stranger still, for a ditching airliner, spraying foam onto the water to lay out a runway to assist the pilots to gauge their height and reduce the fire risk on the water!
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Full story regarding Cdr Russell's accident in the Scimitar here:
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%200896.html
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%200896.html
The Aeronavale been using the old Alouette III and Lynx to this day as plane guard......
cheers
cheers
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all about cost/benefit analysis.
Proper carriers doing Cat/Trap have a higher risk of bods in the water than toy carriers with hovering toys, thus worth the effort of endless hovering.
Proper carriers doing Cat/Trap have a higher risk of bods in the water than toy carriers with hovering toys, thus worth the effort of endless hovering.