Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Bell-Boeing begins designing CMV-22B with $151 million

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Bell-Boeing begins designing CMV-22B with $151 million

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Apr 2016, 20:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,144
Received 98 Likes on 53 Posts
Bell-Boeing begins designing CMV-22B with $151 million

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...-milli-423786/
  • 01 April, 2016
  • BY: James Drew
  • Washington DC
A $151 million contract awarded to V-22 tiltrotor manufacturer Bell-Boeing this week allows engineers to get started designing the US Navy’s future Osprey variant, the CMV-22B, which is replacing the Northrop Grumman C-2 Greyhound twin turboprop in the aircraft carrier logistics role at sea.
Based on the US Marine Corps MV-22B Osprey variant, the navy’s “CMV” tiltrotor will come equipped with extra fuel bladders to extend its range from 860nm to approximately 1,150nm.
That’s the most significant engineering challenge, but the service also requires a beyond line-of-sight radio and public address system so that crews can communicate en route to the aircraft carrier's deck, or between other ships in the battle group.

Bell-Boeing
On 31 March, US Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) announced the $151 million contract with Bell Helicopter and Boeing's joint V-22 programme office in Amarillo, Texas, which covers "non-recurring engineering services associated with the development of the capability for the Navy variant of the V-22”. NAVAIR confirmed that it covers the design changes for all three modifications, including the extended-range fuel system.
More than 70% of the work will be done in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where Boeing fabricates composite V-22 airframes. Another 20% will be completed at Bell’s facility in Fort Worth, Texas.
Just $15 million has been obligated at the time of the award, and work is expected to continue through September 2020. By that time, the first of 44 CMV-22B aircraft, which will be ordered in 2018, will begin delivered from Bell’s final assembly and checkout facility in Amarillo.


Related Content

Trending News
chopper2004 is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2016, 08:15
  #2 (permalink)  
MG
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 593
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Oooh, looks like good timing for a certain large ship(s) in the UK!
MG is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2016, 19:16
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,388
Received 1,584 Likes on 721 Posts
US Navy to replace Greyhounds with Ospreys in Japan | IHS Jane's 360

The United States Navy (USN) is to deploy the CMV-22B version of the Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft to Japan from 2021 to replace its outdated C-2 Greyhounds, Kyodo news agency reported on 30 August.

The USN Greyhounds are currently based at the Naval Air Facility Atsugi, west of Tokyo, but are attached to the USS Ronald Reagan , which has its home port at Yokosuka.

The CMV-22B version of the Osprey has additional fuel tanks that enable it to conduct cargo resupply operations for carrier groups. The aircraft are expected to be based at the US Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni.
ORAC is online now  
Old 1st Sep 2016, 23:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Close to $1B of US taxpayer money was spent for 12 MV-22's just to shuttle federal bureaucrats around.

riff_raff is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 05:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
BLOS radio. Get in there MoD! Flog them the kit we put in storage nearly 30 years ago. And the upgrade we developed to make the US radios work in the first place.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 13:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,061
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
MG: Oooh, looks like good timing for a certain large ship(s) in the UK!

Agree!


Thought they would have stuck with the HV-22 designation, I thought two was the max amount of letters used in the US designation system. CVM does not quite roll off the tounge- no doubt will get a less glamorous nickname...


Thinks she will prove quite handy, but expensive, in the COD role.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 14:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 631
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
BLOS radio. Get in there MoD! Flog them the kit we put in storage nearly 30 years ago.

Or just offer them the BLOS kit based on the Iridium Satphone the UK has been using in recent years.
VX275 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 15:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
VX275

My idea is better. Been waiting for years to get them back for trying to fob us off with obsolete kit in Apache!
tucumseh is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 18:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,575
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
LHD Juan Carlos I, in-cockpit Osprey CQ

SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 20:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They would be a handy addition to the Carrier arsenal, but with more Chinooks than we can shake a stick at, and the Navy awash with EH101s, what would be the justification?
Bigbux is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2016, 14:49
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MG
Oooh, looks like good timing for a certain large ship(s) in the UK!
An oxymoron, Shirley?
glad rag is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2016, 06:04
  #12 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,388
Received 1,584 Likes on 721 Posts
They would be a handy addition to the Carrier arsenal, but with more Chinooks than we can shake a stick at, and the Navy awash with EH101s, what would be the justification?
3 times the range, twice the speed...... But twice the price.
ORAC is online now  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 11:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBH the carriers are already costing enough.......
Heathrow Harry is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.