Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Airborne Nuclear Weapons incidents

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Airborne Nuclear Weapons incidents

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Feb 2016, 21:24
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Yes, accurate meteorology was vital. The mix of skills and duties involved from all over the country in all sorts of specialities fascinated me. A very complex set of problems, and the way possible solutions were developed I found intriguing, as a very tiny cog in a big system.

It led to a lifelong interest in meteorology and aviation amongst other things.
biscuit74 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2016, 02:38
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
That is a fascinating doco on so many levels.
Shows how a task today done digitally was done using people and analog means.
And social mores - no women in roles of authority - all very subservient!
tartare is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2016, 07:13
  #63 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
That met was known as Blue Met.

Regarding military dosage levels, it was only immediate levels that were of concern. How long could you remain effective for?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2016, 16:13
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
On dosage level, my recollection is that we worked on a WED of 75 roentgen for purposes of estimating the worst case usefulness of rescue staff - or the potential for use of various routes for evacuation.
We understood at the time that the armed forces uses the same or similar values; I recall quite a lot of discussion amongst the scientists - almost all the staff were research scientists, some impressively eminent and well known (spending time listening to them was a major upside for an impressionable youth!) - as to how the limits had been derived, and what the experimental evidence backing it up was. The suspicion was that medical tests after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were probably important, plus much extrapolation given the uncontrolled nature of the 'experimental conditions' !


Form what I have seen much more recently, those dosages would have dramatically reduced life expectancy and lifespan, to say the least. Hmm.
biscuit74 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2016, 16:37
  #65 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Biscuit, later on, and I can't remember the year, we were lectured by Wexford-Welch one of 3 wg cdr/cdr who rotated through 3 posts one of which was in the US. He showed us radiated entrails of monkeys.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2016, 21:07
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Biscuit74

On dosage level, my recollection is that we worked on a WED of 75 roentgen for purposes of estimating the worst case usefulness of rescue staff - or the potential for use of various routes for evacuation.
We understood at the time that the armed forces uses the same or similar values; I recall quite a lot of discussion amongst the scientists - almost all the staff were research scientists, some impressively eminent and well known (spending time listening to them was a major upside for an impressionable youth!) - as to how the limits had been derived, and what the experimental evidence backing it up was. The suspicion was that medical tests after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were probably important, plus much extrapolation given the uncontrolled nature of the 'experimental conditions' !


Form what I have seen much more recently, those dosages would have dramatically reduced life expectancy and lifespan, to say the least. Hmm.
Back in the early eighties, I often worked on the CT Scanner at a well known Hospital in Surrey. Among their specialties was a form of radiation therapy which 'killed' diseased bone marrow immediately prior to bone marrow transplant. Stay with me on this, I think there is a connection.

One of the problems with their technique was that repeated doses to various parts of the body had the obvious effect of making the patient very ill indeed, sometimes too ill for the treatment (replacement bone marrow) to have any great effect. So, they reasoned that if they could irradiate the patient's whole body in 'one go', they would be in better shape to take immediate benefit. I knew the man who designed the machine they were building and it was scary.

To give an idea of scale, the 'source' for their previous system which irradiated individual limbs and body areas was, the size of a pencil eraser. (The little rubber thing on the end of a pencil?) This was transported in the back of a Land Rover - just that in its containment! The source they would need for the whole body irradiator was the size of a 'D' Cell battery and would need a twelve ton flat bed to transport it.

Now the guy who designed it did admit that when he rang Aldermaston to discuss the delivery of the source, he was told "Not over an open line!" Furthermore, the MOD wanted to install monitoring equipment in the room where the patients would be. When he asked why, they told him they wanted to know what happened when real people got close to an Atom Bomb.

It didn't take Sherlock Holmes to answer your question; "...as to how the limits had been derived, and what the experimental evidence backing it up was. " Probably not much Hiroshima/ Nagasaki, more the Royal XXXXXXX Hospital in Surrey.

Landroger
Landroger is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2016, 00:16
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Langley Baston:

As 814man has written about RAFG [thank you!] I was personally involved when the C130s returned weapons to the UK, answering SASO's "what-ifs" regarding the behaviour of any contamination post-crash.

I also checked the route forecast issued by Brueggen before signing it off.

The flight days were a bit tense for many of us.
My most utterly, absolutely god awful posting. I was working in the SSA the day the final piece of kit left. We knew they were all being shuttled out and had started the transition to WS3 anyway.

Some of the flights were dummy flights, the one in question we had no idea was the last until the boss ambled into the site and told us to stand down. We got on the blower to DB in the tower and told him to come down.. bless him, he requested a duress authentication. He only came down when he saw us playing footy shirts off, below him.

I found an item recently, the old face to face book (if you need to ask etc) which is quite a chilling piece of Cold War ephemera. One of the mugshots was the OC 9 of the time.. chap by the name of Peach. Not sure what happened to him.
Al R is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2016, 07:27
  #68 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
"He only came down when he saw us playing footy shirts off, below him. "

Ah, laughing gas
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2016, 08:25
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I work for Mr EH Harriman of the Union Pacific Railroad, and he entrusted me..".

"Woodcock, is that you?".
Al R is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.