Shorts Belfast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shorts Belfast
I was told that the Shorts Belfast when in RAF service was CAT 3 autoland equipped, is that true and if so why?
Where there any other RAF aircraft Cat 3 equipped such as the VC10?
Where there any other RAF aircraft Cat 3 equipped such as the VC10?
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, all 10 aircraft were fitted with the equipment as it was used as a test bed for the Trident. Unfortunately it was decided that it was too expensive to maintain currency so it was not approved for use. However, I remember a couple of occasions...
Yes, the Belfast was equipped with the Smiths System Autopilot (as was the Trident I think?) and was autoland capable. Was it called Cat3 back in the 1960's?
I was told that it was so good, that the touchdown zone on the runway used for trials (perhaps Fairford?) developed a dent from the aircraft touching down consistently in the same spot.
It couldn't be used in civilian service as one of the pitch channels was used for the stick-push system that the CAA insisted upon for civil certification.
DH
I was told that it was so good, that the touchdown zone on the runway used for trials (perhaps Fairford?) developed a dent from the aircraft touching down consistently in the same spot.
It couldn't be used in civilian service as one of the pitch channels was used for the stick-push system that the CAA insisted upon for civil certification.
DH
The Tristars had it - I think it was already installed when they were purchased. There was a well documented incident at Brize when one sustained serious damage (Cat 4?) when landing using the system. No doubt much better informed members will give the details
touchdown zone on the runway used for trials (perhaps Fairford?)
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
TTN, Lyneham I believe. I was sitting behind the same pilot when he made an autoland at Mount Pleasant, the first fixed wing aircraft to land there. I don't think the auto land was cleared for use at either case.
TTN,
I could give all the details of the Tristar accident. However, suffiice to say that, after a flight deck pigs, on the second bounce during the "landing" the aircraft smegged the runway hard enough to fracture the rear spar. During the subsequent go around and visual circuit 4.5 tonnes of Avtur vented into the Oxfordshire skies through the damaged spar - you could smell it for weeks.
Lockheed brought a retired stress engineer out of retirement to devise the repair scheme and manage the repair. IIRC it cost about £4.5m.
I could give all the details of the Tristar accident. However, suffiice to say that, after a flight deck pigs, on the second bounce during the "landing" the aircraft smegged the runway hard enough to fracture the rear spar. During the subsequent go around and visual circuit 4.5 tonnes of Avtur vented into the Oxfordshire skies through the damaged spar - you could smell it for weeks.
Lockheed brought a retired stress engineer out of retirement to devise the repair scheme and manage the repair. IIRC it cost about £4.5m.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cyprus
Age: 91
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One of the problems with the Belfast's auto-land system was that it used a leader cable laid out across country for azimuth guidance during the last 300 feet on the glide path and that it used radar altimeter readings for a lot of it's internal switching commands, this required flat ground for the last mile or so before touch down, perhaps beyond the airfield fence.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tristar bounce
During my Midland autoland training we were told the reason for the Tristar impact was that the operating pilot had checked forward on the cc after touch causing all lift dump/spoilers deploying at about fifty feet with the obvious outcome The ground school manager, Peter Hill, was an ex Belslow captain so there was probably some truth in it.
There used to be a tale that the reason for the Trident's offset nose gear was to avoid it hitting the centerline lights on every landing.
That said, I recall a cartoon in BA's house mag when Category IIIA certification (zero-visibility) was finally achieved. It was a solid grey panel captioned: "So we landed in zero visibility. What now?"
Apart from anything else, when the clag got that bad nobody could drive to the airport anyway.
That said, I recall a cartoon in BA's house mag when Category IIIA certification (zero-visibility) was finally achieved. It was a solid grey panel captioned: "So we landed in zero visibility. What now?"
Apart from anything else, when the clag got that bad nobody could drive to the airport anyway.
TTN,
I am sure someone can put up a link to the report on the TriStar accident? Suffice to say, it ranks as a totally unprofessional co$kup. Fortunately, the tremendous capabilities of the aircraft saved the day. However, this incident soured the whole future of the aircraft with elements of the RAF, and gave ammunition to those, particularly at Brize Norton, who would seek to harm its interests. Sadly.
OAP
I am sure someone can put up a link to the report on the TriStar accident? Suffice to say, it ranks as a totally unprofessional co$kup. Fortunately, the tremendous capabilities of the aircraft saved the day. However, this incident soured the whole future of the aircraft with elements of the RAF, and gave ammunition to those, particularly at Brize Norton, who would seek to harm its interests. Sadly.
OAP
That said, I recall a cartoon in BA's house mag when Category IIIA certification (zero-visibility) was finally achieved. It was a solid grey panel captioned: "So we landed in zero visibility. What now?"
Apart from anything else, when the clag got that bad nobody could drive to the airport anyway.
Apart from anything else, when the clag got that bad nobody could drive to the airport anyway.
DH
"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
I may be totally wrong, and am waiting to be shot down, but I believe the Autoland accident stemmed from the fact that the autoland was not actually engaged. The aircraft was descending on the ILS, but of course with no flare.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Herod. Similar to my understanding. I seem to recall there were issues with how the aircraft intercepted the glide slope with the the result that the autopilot was not properly primed. As you say this led the aircraft not flaring.
I am sure that some on here has the full story.
S-D
I am sure that some on here has the full story.
S-D
Herod,
Yes, you have the gist of it,...Align, Flare, Rollout....blah. What really pees me off is, the RAF had an asset 30+YEARS AGO, that was better in many ways than the £30 Billion contract it has now!
OAP
Yes, you have the gist of it,...Align, Flare, Rollout....blah. What really pees me off is, the RAF had an asset 30+YEARS AGO, that was better in many ways than the £30 Billion contract it has now!
OAP
I can't remember much about it because of dead grey cells but, before CAT 3 was invented, the Vulcan was equipped with autoland although it's fair to say that it never came into service (I don't think) and it could only have been used where a lead-in cable was installed.
All three V bombers were fitted with the ILS approach on the autopilot. Some of them landed; the Victor was the best in this regard.
"a bit late on the roundout!"
"I thought You were flying it."
"a bit late on the roundout!"
"I thought You were flying it."