Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Watchkeeper UAV - Your Tax payments at work

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Watchkeeper UAV - Your Tax payments at work

Old 7th Apr 2016, 07:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So while we developed the WK450 the French came up with this
Defence Minister Launches the French Army?s Future Tactical UAV
Looks like they took a very different path to meet a similar requirement, with a bit more flexibility for a similar price.

Did they do a better job?

If so what can we try to apply to future procurement programs?
Ivan Rogov is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2016, 11:57
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Age: 74
Posts: 245
Received 29 Likes on 11 Posts
SLMG

Its an SLMG!!

1. Request a two seater for the air cadets!
2. Fit ans air data computer/electronic vario and when the bad guys hit the engine use the camera on the fin to look for thermals/ridges/wave and soar back to base.

Simples
ACW342 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2016, 07:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 59°09N 002°38W (IATA: SOY, ICAO: EGER)
Age: 80
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
£1m military drone crashed in Wales after crew disabled anti-crash systems – report

There are some interesting comments on this item
ricardian is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2016, 11:13
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: uk
Age: 43
Posts: 56
Received 67 Likes on 25 Posts
Interesting bit of blame-shifting - the rumour is that it happened at Boscombe, not Aberporth, when the crew said it was too foggy to fly but were ordered to get it airborne by a senior operator (with no UAV flying experience). The Master Override was used to try and land it and it crashed.

It is possible this was another accident entirely but the similarities are rather worrying.
Lala Steady is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2016, 12:32
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LaLa - For all the MAA's failing I cannot help but think that "tweaking" an SI as you suggest is a tad improbable even for them!

Having read this article its difficult to conclude that activating the Master Over-ride was, in the circumstances, the least bad option. I certainly hope the "operator" wasn't censured for it and that Thales/Elbit are looking at that aspect of the design.
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2016, 13:24
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,218
Received 317 Likes on 176 Posts
Interesting bit of blame-shifting - the rumour is that it happened at Boscombe, not Aberporth, when the crew said it was too foggy to fly but were ordered to get it airborne by a senior operator (with no UAV flying experience). The Master Override was used to try and land it and it crashed.

It is possible this was another accident entirely but the similarities are rather worrying.
If you read the convening authority's comments at the end of the SI, you will see that he refers to the BD accident and that an SI will be published later this year. He remarks that there will likely be many similarities in the causal factors.
212man is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2016, 15:06
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
"Any landing you can walk away from.........." Every time if it's a UAS
VX275 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2016, 16:37
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With all due respect, I think I have to gently disagree with the idea that:

"Any landing you can walk away from.........." Every time if it's a UAS

These systems are justified as the cheaper, better alternative to manned aircraft. They won't be cheaper if they keep piling in at this sort of rate. Nor will they be better if they're not available because they've piled in.

I've looked at the loss rates for UAVs (UAS, RPAS, drone, etc) and they don't look all that clever. I just hope that when we buy this sort of kit in the future we factor in a realistic attrition rate. Even more important as they get less cheap.

Best regards as ever to those working the cost models,

Engines
Engines is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2016, 17:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I was quite relieved to be able to walk out of the cabin after the UAV I was pilot for lost eight foot of wing at 49 000 ft.
VX275 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2016, 07:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: uk
Age: 43
Posts: 56
Received 67 Likes on 25 Posts
If you read the convening authority's comments at the end of the SI, you will see that he refers to the BD accident and that an SI will be published later this year. He remarks that there will likely be many similarities in the causal factors.
Found that now, thanks 212man I knew about the BD crash but hadn't realised they had speared one in earlier.

Why would you have a UAV that doesn't have the ability to be hand flown in emergency? Is it to do with cap-badge politics and the RA not wanting to call the operators 'pilots' because that's going into AAC/RAF territory?

Strange that despite that 'non pilot' status and no controls, they are still paying loads to give their operators air experience and air awareness training in a light fixed wing.
Lala Steady is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2016, 09:01
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Why would you have a UAV that doesn't have the ability to be hand flown in emergency?
Reduced training burden? If it can be hand flown in an emergency then you'd have to train the operators to hand fly it which would lead to an increase in flying hours etc. etc.
Bing is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2016, 11:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,127
Received 93 Likes on 49 Posts
At Farnborough, outside the Thales Chalet I took a photo of WKX with pylons,

cheers

chopper2004 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2016, 12:20
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: uk
Age: 43
Posts: 56
Received 67 Likes on 25 Posts
Reduced training burden? If it can be hand flown in an emergency then you'd have to train the operators to hand fly it which would lead to an increase in flying hours etc. etc.
Instead, they have crashed 2 and will continue to have problems in poor weather when the automatics struggle. And they are already spending time and money flying their operators to make them air- aware and air-experienced.
Lala Steady is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.