Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

BBRuNe critiques Su-35 landing from 2014

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

BBRuNe critiques Su-35 landing from 2014

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Aug 2015, 17:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BBRuNe critiques Su-35 landing from 2014

BBC: How not to land a fighter jet

Interesting to see this on the front page of the Beeb today, given the on-going debate in the Gnat down at CarFest thread on whether post-incident/accident speculation is appropriate.

(Still, it'll give the Cornish troll army something to do )

Coming soon to a TV near you:

Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2015, 20:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK I'll bite... large left rudder input before touchdown which was maintained during the bounce .. no left wing stall just secondary effect of rudder.
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2015, 21:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'ld be quite pleased with a landing like that.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2015, 21:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
One recalls the 100 degree turn at half mile finals for fighters to land on 09 at Gibraltar (when the Spaniards were being difficult), and that was wet at both ends. However, I think the commentator, Graham Flack*, is right. The Su-35 was never stabilised on the approach, and if only for just a couple of seconds, I think you must have that.

*was he a Jag mate??
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 01:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 706
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I always wondered how many fighters the Soviets really lost in takeoff/landing incidents during the MiG 15/17 years, especially bearing in mind some of the remote snow covered airfields they had their pilots flying out of.

As for the Su-35, yes the pilot botched it and he owes Mother Russia a new missile rail, but that's some impressive low-speed rudder authority to yank that huge beast back on track like that.
Fonsini is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 10:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,759
Received 221 Likes on 69 Posts
The left wing stalls,
Does that mean that it "spun in out of control", and no mention of schools and hospitals that were narrowly avoided either. Come on Aunty, pull your socks up. The public has a right to know!
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 16:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: aus
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the look of the windsock, landing downwind wouldn't have helped.
a1bill is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.