Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Gnat down at CarFest

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Gnat down at CarFest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th May 2016, 15:03
  #261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just asking for transparency.
I'd like to see how much money Carfest gave to Children in Need.

Look at RIAT, a very small amount of the money taken in actually ends up with the charity.
Air police. I think you may find that CarFest raised a significant amount for Children in Need. Well in excess of £1M. I believe they are targeting £2M this year.

Flying displays are only really a sideshow at CarFest though.

S-D
salad-dodger is offline  
Old 16th May 2016, 15:58
  #262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
pasta
Thanks for that. I thought I was being clinicaly stupid again.
cessnapete is offline  
Old 16th May 2016, 17:58
  #263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the Carfest website:

CarFest donates 25% of the ticket revenue to BBC Children in Need plus with other fundraising activity we have raised over £3.4 million since 2012
Now that looks like it's worth supporting more than RIAT. Is there any airshow doing that level of donation to any good cause?
airpolice is offline  
Old 16th May 2016, 18:15
  #264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,707
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Wonder who gets the other 75%
Davef68 is offline  
Old 16th May 2016, 18:44
  #265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,808
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Jersey ... 2015 ... Air display accounts not available for another ?one or two weeks? « Jersey Evening Post

Now here's a local conundrum. Our Deputy ["MP" in the States of Jersey] Mike Higgins is a great Air Show enthusiast. He runs the thing. Indeed, I have been led to believe that the RAFA HQ in St Helier was sold partly to help continue funding the Air Show.

According to the RAFA website, "Trefusis Forbes trophy, awarded for the highest net collection per member including Airshows for overseas. With over £19,000 raised, the trophy goes to the Jersey Branch as always another highly successful year. Collected by Branch Chairman Peter Clarke." In the Charitable context, RBL (Jersey) raised well over £150,000 last year. So NOT exactly a Charity money-spinner for the Air Show ... except for the Tourism benefits, of course, and the Deputy's esteem. Curiously, I always thought it was RAFA orientated ... at least that's what I understood when talking to AM Dusty Miller at the Air Show a year or three ago in the VIP enclosure [for which we paid quite a few quid].

Some years ago I was asked by a previous Lieut-Governor to take over as RAFA Chairman here ... after some background research into what was going on, I said "No Way, Sir".

I now always wonder about the who/why/for whom of some air displays.
MPN11 is online now  
Old 16th May 2016, 20:51
  #266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,789
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
Getting back to the subject at hand. I read the CVs of the Gnat Display Team's pilots in the immediate aftermath of the accident and was left distinctly underwhelmed by most, with the selection criteria appearing to consist of a bit of UAS time and a job in consultancy or investment banking. Now with the benefit of the AAIB's report*, which makes no mention of any Hawk experience in Mr Whyman's flying history, it would appear that even these thinnest of CVs are a little inflated. What exactly does "completed his initial RAF Pilot Training" mean in another pilot's profile?

I would be very surprised if any of the inexperienced individuals flew a display in future in the light of the AAIB's report. So it will be interesting to see how firmly the aircraft owners subscribe to the historical and educational aims of the Heritage Aircraft Trust, which will presumably require them to continue to foot a decent chunk of the bill while rather more experienced pilots display the aircraft on their behalf. Very happy to be proved wrong but I have a feeling that the charitable aims followed rather than led in this venture.

* Excellent report, with one caveat - I would have liked to have seen an assessment of where the pilot was likely to be looking after completing his twinkle rolls. What was next in the display sequence - did it need him to get visual with the other aircraft or would he have been looking for some ground feature? My thought on seeing the video was that he could have been looking over his shoulder when pulling in to the overbank, hence late recognition and inadequate recovery action. The report did include a one-liner that disorientation could not be ruled out, but I think a paragraph expanding upon that would have been useful context.

Last edited by Easy Street; 16th May 2016 at 21:06.
Easy Street is online now  
Old 16th May 2016, 21:51
  #267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew two practice displays this weekend I believe (having seen the pictures and video of such taken by friends). Wouldn't stop anyone in the states.
Alber Ratman is offline  
Old 18th May 2016, 17:12
  #268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Behind the wire.
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPL type rating

Could someone please explain why a single engine Jet aircraft doesn't require a SE (Jet) type rating? Also am I correct in thinking that if you wanted to fly / display a SU26M or Extra 300 you need to obtain a high performance rating including passing ATPL exams? Does the same apply if your flying a category of aircraft that the CAA aren't able to categorize say a jet aircraft with more than zero but less than two engines?


Also does anyone else think the report is missing the kind of human factors / physiology issues associated with flying high performance jet aircraft? This would be totally standard in an MAA investigation.?.?
High_Expect is offline  
Old 18th May 2016, 19:24
  #269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,660
Received 69 Likes on 44 Posts
The CAA do not issue SE(JET) type ratings;one is issued an `Aircraft type rating Exemption,under Article 242 of the ANO 2009,for ex-mil jet aircraft,either single or multi-engined.
It is not necessary to take ATPL exams before flying/displaying high performance aircraft.
In the case of ex-mil jet aircraft,one has to do a conversion course on the particular aircraft,both technical and flying,in accordance with CAP 632,depending on previous experience,before being issued with a full exemption,subject to satisfactory standard of technical knowledge and handling skills.
sycamore is offline  
Old 19th May 2016, 04:40
  #270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Behind the wire.
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sycamore
The CAA do not issue SE(JET) type ratings;one is issued an `Aircraft type rating Exemption,under Article 242 of the ANO 2009,for ex-mil jet aircraft,either single or multi-engined.
It is not necessary to take ATPL exams before flying/displaying high performance aircraft.
In the case of ex-mil jet aircraft,one has to do a conversion course on the particular aircraft,both technical and flying,in accordance with CAP 632,depending on previous experience,before being issued with a full exemption,subject to satisfactory standard of technical knowledge and handling skills.

Thanks for clearing that up. Does seem a little strange that they impose the (piston) part on a type rating then - I always assumed that there would be an SE (Jet) to justify having SE (Piston).

One day I'll care enough to learn and understand the CAAs logic**
High_Expect is offline  
Old 19th May 2016, 05:00
  #271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck. It's an EASA masterstroke, not just the CAA.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 19th May 2016, 18:39
  #272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Church Fenton Airshow cancelled.

It'll be the first of many. Linky below
Airshow cancelled because of "challenging year" (From The Northern Echo)


Small time air-show, but a bellwether for 2016. The industry will have to adapt more quickly if it is to survive.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 19th May 2016, 18:42
  #273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 706
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I confess I amazed when I saw that final rolling turn - that Gnat seemed to turn on a sixpence, I wonder what the acceleration was.

Sympathies to the pilot and his family, such a waste.
Fonsini is offline  
Old 21st May 2016, 20:02
  #274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rather nice to see that the last post remembers the fact that this is a human story, as well as an opportunity to discuss objectively the points raised in the report and, of course, the myriad of questions that it raises for discussion within our community.

What I appreciate about CAA/MAA reports is that they are objective and dispassionate, unlike many of the posts within this thread - although I don't disagree with the majority of the points raised here within, I'd offer for general consideration that emotive language is neither empathetic (to those that may have known the bloke and his family) or indeed professional, if you wish to pass comment as an SME.

Of course, if you don't want or care to be either, then that's a shame but is itself testament to the many different types of personality I've worked with and continue to work with within the Aviation World.

In memory of absent friends from all domains.

Night all!
Beermonkey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.