Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Reports of A400 Crash, Saville, Spain

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Reports of A400 Crash, Saville, Spain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th May 2015, 21:44
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Was that actually a loop. The camera angle in the video shows it not to be a loop exactly...more of a steep return to target perhaps?
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 13th May 2015, 22:40
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Thomas, no it wasn't, but I don't think it was posted as the loop after take off. Just an example of what the 400 can do. Still bloody impressive for a big aircraft.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 13th May 2015, 23:01
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Italy
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Loop

I concur that it's often difficult to exactly understand what one's looking at in this type of shots as one doesn't have any reference (aka "where's the horizon") but I believe it actually was a "reverse half Cuban Eight" which is described as:

from level flight pull up to about 45 deg, half roll, downward 5/8 loop back to level flight

Last edited by olandese_volante; 13th May 2015 at 23:07. Reason: The video apparently has nothing to do with last tuesday's test flight, it's from sometime last year.
olandese_volante is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 08:20
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
The mis-translation of 'loop' from the original Spanish and the irrelevant posting of that A400M Farnborough video has, regrettably, brought out the spotters. I watched that display; it was merely a steep wingover with about 100-110° of bank and has absolutely nothing to do with the Sevilla accident.

Why a journalist would wish to find out which crew members were able to leave the aircraft I do not know either - those of us who do know will not be disclosing that information either on this thread or via PM....

Would those swapping childish insults please desist from doing so. Thanks.
BEagle is online now  
Old 14th May 2015, 09:10
  #85 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,358
Received 1,566 Likes on 712 Posts
Spain Shifts Airbus A400M Crash Probe to Military

LONDON—Spain has shifted responsibility for the crash probe of an Airbus Group NV A400M military cargo plane to the military, as investigators begin to tap information from the aircraft’s black boxes.

The Spanish crash investigation will now be led by the military, a Defense Ministry spokesman said Wednesday. He wouldn’t explain why the military has taken over from the transport ministry’s civil aviation accident team that was initially put in charge.
ORAC is online now  
Old 14th May 2015, 10:22
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beagle,
The mis-translation of 'loop' from the original Spanish and the irrelevant posting of that A400M Farnborough video has, regrettably, brought out the spotters. I watched that display; it was merely a steep wingover with about 100-110° of bank and has absolutely nothing to do with the Sevilla accident.
Courtney is spot on ...to wit;
Originally Posted by Courtney Mil
Thomas, no it wasn't, but I don't think it was posted as the loop after take off. Just an example of what the 400 can do. Still bloody impressive for a big aircraft.
I apologise if my 'irrelevant' posting offended your sensibilities. I didn't claim it was related in any other way than as an example of the aircrafts performance envelope after doubt was shed after ORACs
after doing a loop above the runway.......
Have a whiskey and a lie down, old son. People might think you are becoming a little pretentious..
Hempy is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 10:30
  #87 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In the shadow of R101
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My apologies that I seem to have provoked heated discourse, had I seen the Aviation Week link posted by TT earlier then I would not have posted what I did, I immediately edited my original post to state that my suggestion was incorrect.

Sadly even first-hand accounts can be misinterpreted, I did not intend to speculate.
Feathers McGraw is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 11:10
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You seem a little miffed that this thread hasn't run the usual course of page after page of mindless drivel, wild speculation and outlandish theories from armchair theorists and FSX players. I note we also have a locked thread on Jet Blast about why this thread is different.
No: I simply think that Courtney Mil's attitude stinks.

Also, you misinterpreted my comments in the other thread (probably as they're poorly written). I'm happy to see a lack of wild speculation and uninformed nonsense by FSX'ers but this is a discussion forum. Stamping on any form of discussion is counterproductive. I guess the problem is finding a way to allow those with useful insight to post their thoughts while simultaneously stopping the FSX team from posting their stuff.
Anyway that's probably a discussion for another thread. Apologies if I caused any offense, I was wound up by CM's attitude.
Nemrytter is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 19:12
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Trumpville; On the edge
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Update #2

Latest factual information here:
A400M accident: Update number 2
Trumpet_trousers is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 19:19
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest factual information here:
A400M accident: Update number 2
From the linked article:
"Airbus Defence and Space owns five A400M test aircraft of which three are currently in service and the other two have been retired. "

Anyone know why those two test birds were "retired"? Were they non-flying test articles?
KenV is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 19:35
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Trumpville; On the edge
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know why those two test birds were "retired"? Were they non-flying test articles?
MSN1 and MSN3 are retired, both having completed their respective flying roles in the flight test program. MSN1 is in Toulouse and either has, or shortly will, go on public display. MSN3 is in Seville, and has had some items 'spares recovered' to keep the remaining 3 test airframes flying.
Trumpet_trousers is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 23:30
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Deepest darkest London
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KenV


Boeing has retired most of the 787 test fleet and has already placed several in museums including one at Pima.


R.I.P to the guys that sadly died. I hope the survivors make a full recovery.


V1
Valiantone is offline  
Old 15th May 2015, 09:39
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Paris, France
Age: 62
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aviationweek has an article

A400M Crash Adds To Airlifter Program?s Woes | Defense content from Aviation Week

It states both pilots are among the casualties. It ends with second-hand reports and speculations on the cause of the accident.

Last edited by fgrieu; 15th May 2015 at 09:57.
fgrieu is offline  
Old 15th May 2015, 10:52
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Age: 76
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In this morning's German paper it read that all four engines cut shortly after departure with the aircraft at a height of around 500 meters. There was no source for that report, though.

There's strong local interest in this story because the German A400Ms are based not far from here, at Wunstorf. Too, Airbus is an important local employer.

Local papers have already covered such A400M issues as the lack of operational readiness of the type, and the program's negative impact on the financial performance of Airbus, so that if it turns out that there's some further, serious technical problem that shall come to light, that should see local coverage beyond the usual level for the crash of a military aircraft.
chuks is offline  
Old 15th May 2015, 12:36
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,060
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
So on the 400 would a transition from TOGO thrust to climb thrust be done via a manual pull on the throttle quadrant, or via setting speed on the autopilot? I imagine the transition to climb thrust would be at about the listed altitude of 500M.

I am not speculating, just trying to understand how the system works.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 15th May 2015, 16:55
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: home for good
Posts: 494
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Given the strong feelings in evidence on this thread, I'd suggest it may be worth the OP renaming this thread and adding "condolences only" to the title. Another thread could then run to cover the interest in the cause of the incident. This solution had been tried and tested on previous sad events.
Sandy Parts is offline  
Old 15th May 2015, 16:57
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 73
Posts: 1,011
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Or start another titled "Condolences Only "

El G.
El Grifo is online now  
Old 15th May 2015, 17:58
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sandiego89

Since you neither know how the A400M auto-throttles work, or what the TOGA power setting is called, I suspect you aren't going to get very far diagnosing the cause of the crash, even if you did have the FDR traces to hand.

I don't mean to sound rude, but it is rather frustrating that when someone has very politely requested people avoid speculation, principally because there are members who frequent this forum who are directly impacted by the incident, people carry on regardless.
FTE Pruner is offline  
Old 15th May 2015, 21:42
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,755
Received 2,740 Likes on 1,166 Posts
Sigh...
I wish people would desist in this mindless guessing game and speculation, have some respect for the fact that people in this thread were and are close to those involved.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 15th May 2015, 22:01
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bradford
Age: 54
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can not understand how they don't get it Nutty
Best to the survivors.
John
jonw66 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.