Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

THEODORE ROOSEVELT IN UK WATERS

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

THEODORE ROOSEVELT IN UK WATERS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 19:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: scotland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
THEODORE ROOSEVELT IN UK WATERS

Just seen some pictures of the USS Theodore Roosevelt in UK waters on FB and the BBC, a very impressive beast indeed, do we really want something like this when we can't afford MPA. I understand some of the thinking behind it but I am still not sure.
KPax is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 20:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oil Capital of Central Scotland
Age: 56
Posts: 486
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
..... Something like this... is right.


Broon's Memorial White Elephants are still smaller than the big Teddy & if we scrape up the manpower to fully staff it, we probably won't have anybody left to man the escort, so it'll need to remain permanently in port.......


This will be no bad thing, as I hate to think of the running costs for them considering that they are gas turbine powered rather than nuclear.


...... and that's before we work out whether we can put anything on it that might be capable of flight, whether it needs a catapult, or not.....


End Rant Mode.
Donkey497 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 20:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Debatable whether we're getting anything like a Nimitz Class carrier...

...and which is at least capable of carrying its own MPA.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 20:35
  #4 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Interesting on manpower. The 30 year old USD TR has a crew of 3200, 90 aircraft and 2480 people on its air wing.

The QE will have a crew of 679 and 250 troops and a total of 1600 bunks. On ccontrast it will have only 40 (50) aircraft.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 20:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 2,867
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
It's escort, Winston S Churchill has a UK navigator, RN I'm assuming, as a nod of respect to the ex WW2 Prime Minister..
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 21:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Erewhon
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as a nod of respect to the ex WW2 Prime Minister..
That'll be the same prime minister that shat all over Bomber Command then . . . worth respecting unless you're one of the 55,000 casualties' next of kin of course.

I just raise that because we're commemorating all sorts of stuff at the moment.

Sorry about the thread drift, just finished one of several books on WWII and Who Betrayed the Bomber Boys video.

Last edited by Brian W May; 22nd Mar 2015 at 21:49. Reason: Addition regarding thread drift.
Brian W May is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 22:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,236
Received 54 Likes on 22 Posts
Pontius- The Ford-class carriers under development have a crew (minus air wing) of 2600 due to automation.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 22:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Near where the Wokkas live.
Age: 79
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brian W May

That'll be the same prime minister that shat all over Bomber Command then . . . worth respecting unless you're one of the 55,000 casualties' next of kin of course.

To add to the thread drift, the Poles who fought with the British forces received the same treatment from Churchill at the end of the war.


I am a great admirer of Churchill, and possibly understand the politics that made him do this, but having a WW2 Polish heritage and great respect for Bomber Command, it just doesn't seem right.
polecat2 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 23:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southern England
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicopters late flying Fareham Portsmouth

Multiple helicopters heard flying over Fareham very late last night, wondered if it was anything to do with the US ship in Solent
nic_from_rae is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 07:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hampshire (UK)
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does anybody know if there will be any fixed wing ops from her while she's here.?

I'm expecting the mockery regarding folding wings etc etc!
normalbloke is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 07:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Suffolk
Age: 65
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ooh, what a lot of planes!

USS Theodore Roosevelt From The Air 2015
99 Change Hands is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 08:02
  #12 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,466
Received 1,626 Likes on 743 Posts
Fixed that for you....

679 and 250 troops and a total of 1600 bunks. On ccontrast it will have only 40 (50) aircraft.
679 and 250 troops and a total of 1600 bunks. On ccontrast it will have space for up to 40 (50) aircraft - which will leave lots of room for volley ball and cocktail parties around the 10-12 available from the currently expected total purchase.........
ORAC is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 10:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 532
Received 178 Likes on 94 Posts
Broon's Memorial White Elephants are still smaller than the big Teddy & if we scrape up the manpower to fully staff it, we probably won't have anybody left to man the escort, so it'll need to remain permanently in port.......


This will be no bad thing, as I hate to think of the running costs for them considering that they are gas turbine powered rather than nuclear.


...... and that's before we work out whether we can put anything on it that might be capable of flight, whether it needs a catapult, or not.....
My, what a load of misinformed tripe.

The Brown thing is a myth - if you actually look at the history of the project he tried everything to kill them - or at least avoid ordering them. The complement is broadly the same as a CVS - incidentally, that's one reason why they're so big.

Glad to see you're fully informed as to the relative running costs of nuclear vs diesel and GT-powered ships. I can't wait to see your comparison.

Does anybody know if there will be any fixed wing ops from her while she's here.?
She'll sit on Charlie buoy for the week she's here. No flying ops other than any helo VIPTAX/HDS.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 10:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hampshire (UK)
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for the info re flying ops. Disappointing! I was there when she arrived, to the point of watching her drop anchor and being able to hear the anchor chains run from the shore. Now if only I can get a tour!,

I can dream!
normalbloke is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 11:01
  #15 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,466
Received 1,626 Likes on 743 Posts
Glad to see you're fully informed as to the relative running costs of nuclear vs diesel and GT-powered ships. I can't wait to see your comparison.
Well, one has been done.

Bottom line, nuclear is more expensive, for LSD class ships and larger, unless the price of oil goes above $323 a barrel (in 2011 dollars).

Congressional Budget Office - 2011 - The Cost-Effectiveness of Nuclear Power for Navy Surface Ships
ORAC is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 11:19
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 532
Received 178 Likes on 94 Posts
Indeed - and that study was conduced on the assumption of an existing support infrastructure for nuclear surface ships - which the RN doesn't have.

Makes the earlier assertion that GT powered ships were going to be vastly more expensive than nuclear even more ludicrous dont'cha think?
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 13:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The 4.5-acre (1.8-hectare) warship has been anchored off Stokes Bay because it is too big to dock at Portsmouth's Royal Navy base. Its sailors were due to disembark the ship for shore leave later this week.


Portsmouth City Council said the influx of the ship's crew to the city could lead to a boost of about £1.5m for the local economy.


Donna Jones, leader of Portsmouth council said: "This is great news for Portsmouth because it means money spent in local businesses: restaurants, cafes and shops, as well as strengthening the ties between the British and American Navy."


and not just restaurants, cafes & shops methinks...........
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 13:13
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Resurrect overpaid, oversexed and over here?
West Coast is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 13:15
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking of Art galleries, gyms, the many and varied cultural centres of Portsmouth.............................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 14:28
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northumberland
Age: 65
Posts: 748
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Managed to get a look around an American Carrier off Portsmouth in 1982 (was waiting to embark on HMS Invincible for a trip to Copenhagen...those were the days..). Mightily impressive beast (can't remember the name). Met some US Marines on one of the decks. Asked how many Marines on board, '500' he said. Role I asked, 'Crowd control' he said. For on shore I asked, 'no, on board' he replied.
Allegedly living areas were grouped by ethnic origin and the Captain had a 24 hour armed guard.
On another tack, they had 80 aircraft on board, an impressive collection.
Invincible had 3 Helicopters and 6 Harriers....
Great run ashore though in Copenhagen. Tannoy not long after docking told us where the local parks were. We sat there at lunchtime and waited for all the female workers to appear, get their tops off and eat their sandwiches....happy days...
Wyler is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.