Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Oh dear, will they never learn?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Oh dear, will they never learn?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Feb 2015, 22:36
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
It seems the Brown Jobs on the ARRSE website are truly having a field day.....
And who can blame them on this occasion.

However there have been some entirely predictable remarks about the RAF Regiment on this forum, which I learned to take with a certain resignation when I was in the corps. However I would submit that this bloke is no more a typical RAF Regiment gunner than Bud Holland was a typical B52 pilot, or the guy who took a soldier's head off at South Cerney was a typical Hercules pilot. There are idiots in all trades and specialisations, and when it all goes wrong they have to accept the consequences of their actions

Roadster - I agree - five years is what I would have thought more appropriate.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2015, 17:54
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Age: 84
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not wishing to create thread drift but military 'automatic' pistols look the same whether loaded or empty, whereas it was pretty apparent with the revolver when it was loaded. Is there any way of looking up figures which might indicate which type causes fewer accidents?
Rosevidney1 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2015, 18:10
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm guessing the type that "isn't pointed at your mates before deliberately pulling the trigger", is the type that causes the least accidents.

No sympathy.
rock34 is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2015, 03:32
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Followed closely by the type that "is checked to ensure no rounds are in the firing chamber or in position to be easily fired" (like in the weapon at all).


The first rule of weapons-handling is to treat all weapons as loaded and ready to fire.

The second rule of weapons-handling is to physically check the weapon as soon as you hold it to determine whether it is loaded or not.

The third rule of weapons-handling is to render the weapon safe (unable to fire) unless you are planning to fire it immediately.

The fourth rule of weapons-handling is to never point the muzzle at anything you are not willing to shoot.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2015, 06:28
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 80
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It. Would appear that the RAF regiment is not the only military organisation to suffer from poor firearm discipline - an American publication states that 90 US servicemen were killed by negligent discharge of a firearm during operations in Iraq.
bcgallacher is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2015, 07:31
  #26 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Botswana & Greece
Age: 68
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TT

And who can blame them on this occasion.

However there have been some entirely predictable remarks about the RAF Regiment on this forum, which I learned to take with a certain resignation when I was in the corps. However I would submit that this bloke is no more a typical RAF Regiment gunner than Bud Holland was a typical B52 pilot, or the guy who took a soldier's head off at South Cerney was a typical Hercules pilot. There are idiots in all trades and specialisations, and when it all goes wrong they have to accept the consequences of their actions

Roadster - I agree - five years is what I would have thought more appropriate.
TT Ex Rock!

Despite this I agree with you totally. Three years is far too short. Would this be Colchester or civilian prison? Also will he get time off for good behaviour? In which case 3 years is ridiculous. Why was the Judge an army officer not Royal Air Force?
Exascot is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2015, 07:59
  #27 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
GK, I would put rule 4 first.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2015, 12:22
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Age: 67
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 13 Posts
Exascot

Things have moved on a bit. The judge is a civilian and the prosecutor can come from any of the Services. I think the deal is still that long sentences are served in normal clink rather than Colchester.

ff
Fortissimo is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2015, 15:11
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Two years or less - Motor Cycle Training Centre.

Anything more - civvy clink.

That is, unless the MOD can't countenance having prisoners guilty of the particular offence(s). Usually the sentence itself would be longer than two years so not an issue, but there can be mitigating circumstances.

I knew a chap a long time ago - later in his career, after I had left, he got done for kiddy porn. He only got 6 months but didn't go to Colly. I think the MOD & civvy police figure out where's best to try the nonces and such.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2015, 16:27
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,180
Received 379 Likes on 233 Posts
bcgallacher:
With ops from 2003 to 2011, that figure is very believable.
We used to get accident reports and summaries each month when I was in the Navy. Even in peace time, you'd get a few accidents a year where firearms were discharged wrongly, and some of those ended up being fatal.
With tens of thousands of troops and loaded weapons everywhere, the chance for a cock up increases significantly in wartime.
It's a tribute to the training that there aren't more such mistakes.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2015, 20:28
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regiment gunner in 'firearm works exactly as advertised' shocker. If he was so confident in his party trick perhaps he could have demonstrated on himself first. His mate is extremely lucky the he lowered the weapon from his head. Crikey! Not a clever bloke.
Torque Tonight is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2015, 01:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Attic
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
I wonder when he was "whisked out of the wagon and away round the corner" if he tripped up any stairs?

No amount of training will ever stop that "Unthinking Moment".

I found that a healthy fear of getting several good hard punches from your Cpl or peers if you:

1. Did anything dangerous
2. Dropped another Rock in the dwang
3. Did anything which caused the Sqn grown-ups to get involved

Generally prevented most incidents.

Yes I am old, and yes I understand this cannot happen in these truly modern times.

Per Ardua injured matey and speedy recovery.

A message to the fool; I hope it hurts in jail.
sittingstress is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2015, 05:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dead Dog Land
Age: 77
Posts: 531
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Couldn't agree more, Sittingstress. I can well remember as a 16year old apprentice being on the range at Locking. I had finished firing, removed the magazine and cleared the weapon. I stood up and turned to one side bringing the rifle parallel to the firing line. The next thing I knew I was flat on my back with a severe pain in the kidney area and a Rock Cpl bellowing " You won't do that again, you ****", and I didn't.
The Oberon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.