Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

official, new AF 1 selected.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

official, new AF 1 selected.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jan 2015, 05:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
official, new AF 1 selected.

No great shock to anyone I imagine.

Pentagon picks new Air Force One plane - CNN.com
West Coast is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2015, 09:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
Move along, nothing to see here, I guess.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2015, 10:02
  #3 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Wonder if Airbus would like to offer an A380 for a similar role in the EU.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2015, 10:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
""NEW"


ROFL...
glad rag is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2015, 16:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,806
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
A380 far too big for many airports. POTUS wouldn't be able to drop in for a campaigning visit [sorry, meaningful discussions] using one of them.

Carry on, Boeing ... you know it makes some sense. The fleet of other aircraft that have to accompany Barry are built by you as well, aren't they?
MPN11 is online now  
Old 29th Jan 2015, 17:51
  #6 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
MPN, not POTUS but POTEU or UEDuP or some such.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2015, 19:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,806
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Haha .. POTEU will deffo have an A360 for the combination of range and flexibility. And demand an upper deck for the comms crew

I wonder who flies TB around these days? Does he succumb to commercial, or has some oily oerson lent him a large private jet? Or does he just sit at home(s) and 'work' by Skype?
MPN11 is online now  
Old 29th Jan 2015, 19:54
  #8 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
MPN, the latter.

He uses a Bombadier.

Former prime minister Tony gets a £30m Blair Force One - Telegraph

The advantage of using a little jet is privacy. He can say there is no capacity for journalists from the gutter press such the Times, Telegraph, Garudian etc.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 00:24
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
http://theaviationist.com/2015/01/29...-picks-b747-8/

Artist's rendition of what it may look like. It's a big bastard...
West Coast is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 00:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wonder if Airbus would like to offer an A380 for a similar role in the EU.
They probably would if the EU became the "Leader of The Free World"
Turbine D is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 03:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,202
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
Airbus declined to bid becausea condition of the contract was the aircraft had to be built in the USA
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 08:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 138 Likes on 60 Posts
""NEW"


ROFL...
Gladrag, what exactly is amusing about that?
Avionker is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 09:54
  #13 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Turbine D, aren't we?

We certainly didn't vote for your leader.

Define Free World?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 11:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Gladrag, what exactly is amusing about that?"

well in 40 years it will probably be still in service and attracting as many plane spotters as politician spotters as you don't see many 85 year old designs still in front line use (excepting, as always, the DC-3)

Bit the same as if Mrs Merkel turned up in a Ju-52/3m.............

quaint but not exactly cutting edge image
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 13:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
Airbus would not have bid even if it wasn't required to be built in the US. Who remembers the VH-71 and the KC-45? I'm sure they do.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 14:29
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HH...you don't see many 85 year old designs still in front line use...
HMMMMM. The B-52 is very much still in "front line use" and it's first flight was way back in 1952 and was (loosely) based on a 1946 design. The NEWEST B-52 was built back in 1962. The BUFF will still be flying well into the middle of this century. It's already a third generation bomber (3rd generation in that 3 generations of pilots have flown the same tail number aircraft.) and will likely be a fifth or sixth generation bomber before it is finally retired.

As for the 747-8 not providing a "cutting edge image", name ANY airliner that would provide a more "cutting edge image".
KenV is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 15:41
  #17 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
As for the 747-8 not providing a "cutting edge image", name ANY airliner that would provide a more "cutting edge image".
787?

Flew in one, loved it.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 16:06
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
787?
1. Too small & not enough engines. USAF demands 4 engines.

2. 95%+ of people would not know the difference between a 787 and any other widebody twin-jet.

And separately, the 747-8 has new wings, engines, avionics, flight controls, and lots more. The only thing not new and "cutting edge" is the familiar (and arguably iconic) humped shape of the fuselage. While most airliners all look alike, the 747 is immediately recognizable (OK, the DC-10/MD-11's shape is also kind of unique and easy to recognize.)
KenV is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 16:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KenV, you said (your bold):
name ANY airliner that would provide a more "cutting edge image
PN said 787. I would have added A350 to that too.

S-D
salad-dodger is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2015, 16:43
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,143
Received 98 Likes on 53 Posts
Best of luck, then...point of entry is 4/5 years before HMX-1 fully equipped with the VH-92?

Here is an excellent documentary on AF1 by National Geographic, best part is Bush Jnr#s Thanksgiving secret mission into Baghdad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdqIvFOKyGY
chopper2004 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.