Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New RAF Transport

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New RAF Transport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2014, 14:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 51st State
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
New RAF Transport

Looks like Brize have got their hands on their shiny new toy.


ZM400 arrives into Brize ? FighterControl ? Home to the Military Aviation Enthusiast

Last edited by HaveQuick2; 17th Nov 2014 at 14:52. Reason: spelling fail!
HaveQuick2 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 15:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Erewhon
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a gopping looking aeroplane . . . are you SURE it wasn't designed by the Russians?
Brian W May is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 15:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like it. But is it really worth almost as much as one C-17, or two C-130Js?
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 16:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Simply Towers.
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Send it back, they've put the tail on upside down.
Simplythebeast is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 16:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: home for good
Posts: 494
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the front end does look a bit like someone with their eyes too close together straining to 'unload' something Still - as long as it delivers (literally..)
Sandy Parts is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 16:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,868
Received 2,816 Likes on 1,200 Posts
Very nice, but the warning line for the prop arc seems a bit OTT.
I wonder how much extra sales will be generated as she gets seen around the world plying her trade.
Finally something to take the capability void left by the Belfast, a mid range lifter that slots in between the Herc and a C17.



..

Last edited by NutLoose; 17th Nov 2014 at 21:28.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 21:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 63
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
God thought you lot would appreciate a new bit of kit finally arriving all you want to do is slag it off ( oh god it's not American is is it )
Exvacert is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 21:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,373
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
A case of 'form follows function' here methinks. So if it functions, what is there to complain about?
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 22:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 503
Received 40 Likes on 10 Posts
How about we shower it in defensive aids - does that jazz up the ugliness enough for you?

iRaven is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 22:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,868
Received 2,816 Likes on 1,200 Posts
And a Herc isn't exactly a thing of beauty.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 22:14
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Interesting seeing it from the front.
Those horizontal stabs sure are big - so's the tail.
I wonder if there's growth factored into the airframe - in total that empennage sort of looks like it belongs on a longer fuse...
tartare is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 22:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And a Herc isn't exactly a thing of beauty.
'Til ya fly it.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 22:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 63
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny that stn 0 is a way forward of the radome
Exvacert is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 23:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,868
Received 2,816 Likes on 1,200 Posts
Probably refers to the refuelling probe.

Even the Herc fresh out of the factory looked a dogs dinner at the front until it evolved with the radar.
See

https://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-margie/1163487610/
NutLoose is online now  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 23:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,274
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Nice look but why a black radome? It looks so last century!
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2014, 23:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 63
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stn 0 aint nothing to to do with probe and from reading your posts you are a tornado man where was stn 0 on a gr1
Exvacert is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2014, 01:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: W England
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tail on upside down!

To reply to simply the beast...

I have a memory of the time when the designs for the aircraft were being distributed around. There was a very similar design to this one, which had the elevators in-line with the wings. This aircraft had prop engines.

An alternative version had jet engines and, consequently, the elevators were lifted above the wing line. Of course, because a committee decided on which design was better they decided that they liked the present aircraft but wanted prop engines!

I seem to remember it was the Germans who insisted that their design was used ( ie a high tail) but ( stupidly, I think) not with jet engines. In the Herc, one had greatly increased elevator authority at slow speeds because of the prop wash over them. This was particularly handy during para drops or tactical landings.

Not sure why they have dispensed with this; maybe because modern fly-by-wire systems can cope much better?
SET 18 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2014, 03:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: one side of la Manche
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Moving the void

Nutloose
"Finally something to take the capability void left by the Belfast, a mid range lifter that slots in between the Herc and a C17."

Only in RAF service it doesn't slot in there. To help fill the 'Defence black hole' our A400 are not complementing the Herc capability but replacing it.

Got an important (to you) load? Too much for a CH47? You'll soon have to wait until the next A400 is filled.

Regards
Batco
BATCO is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2014, 03:58
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Airdrie
Age: 62
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
STN 0

Front of the jig perhaps?
30AB is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2014, 08:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
From the comments on the link

That looks the nads that does
Brian May said

What a gopping looking aeroplane
Personally I incline more to the "gopping" than "the nads" myself, but who cares if the thing works? Great to see the RAF getting some new kit.
Tankertrashnav is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.