Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Def Sec Speech Con Conf

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Def Sec Speech Con Conf

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 19:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Def Sec Speech Con Conf

Having watched and listened carefully to Mr Fallon's speech, I was left with senses of disbelief, incredulity, and foreboding. Reading the transcript, you could be misled into thinking that the state of our armed forces was improving, and that in the near future would be extremely robust. To quote him, 'Putin should be in no doubt that our collective defence is as strong as ever'. This comment was made as a punch line: is he from Mars? He is also delivering 'new fleets of fighters'. His delivery was akin to childlike puppetry. For God's sake, if he truly believes the words that were prepared for him, this man is not fit for his role. But I guess that he'll meet Cameron's needs.


Read the rest. Yes, there is some welcome stuff. But it was all about bandaging a mortal patient and playing, disgracefully, to a largely unsuspecting electorate. For now. IMHO that is.


And now, Cameron, proudly announces he'll send TWO more aircraft to Cyprus. The mouse is roaring.

Last edited by cuefaye; 2nd Oct 2014 at 20:27.
cuefaye is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 19:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But if you say something often enough and loud enough it makes it true. Anyway, back to Narnia for a good night's sleep for Mr Fallon.
thing is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 19:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Thing just responded to a similar point raised by me on the "Bare Bones" thread, If correct, Fallon's pants would be ablaze mid-speech.

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 20:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
TWO more aircraft to Cyprus.
But every fighter crew knows they can win any war on their own

Is the other an airborne spare?
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 20:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
According to the Togagraph No. 2 Squadron will not disband to reform on Typhoons next year in March because the Tornados are too badly needed to fight ISIL. However, the Typhoon Squadron is not going to be re-numbered, not a chance, it won't now form, apparently for another year when 2 Squadron will eventually disband. So there you go, robust defence on a shoe string! Or should that be on the hoof?!?!?

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 20:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Cuefaye, I like the point you have raised. I saw it too and was horrified. My take on it was that the Armed Forces are screwed and the polies are convinced that they can get away with talking bollocks and that the public will believe what they say. A tragic state of affairs. I think they actually believe their own crap.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 20:28
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said mate! But how do they get away with it? More to the point, how do we let them?
cuefaye is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 20:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read about these latest developments on Auntie Beeb's site.

2 more Tornados to deploy to Cyprus. Hooray, I thought.

II(AC) now won't disband next year but will carry on as the third Tonka squadron for another year. Hooray, I thought.

Then I thought I'd come over here and find out the truth of the matter.

What are they going to do with the "spare" Typhoons that now aren't going to form up as II(AC) at Lossiemouth? (Flog them off to Oman, I guess...)

[Be gentle with me, I am old and feeble, and cannot find my slippers]
PeregrineW is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 20:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they can get away with talking bollocks and that the public will believe what they say. A tragic state of affairs. I think they actually believe their own crap.
No, it's worse than that. They think that the public will believe what they say. That's the sadness of it. Every man jack in the country knows that when a pollie opens his trap a lie comes out but they are too dumb/isolated to understand that. We know that they constantly lie, but they don't know/ignore that we know. I'm sure a lot of pollies are insane, and I don't say that in jest.
thing is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 09:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 67
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately it is a true statement that Defence no longer wins votes in any parties minds, obviously not a view held by this forum. The reality of the last Government was a funding situation everyone in the system knew - project budgets were pushed out so far that there was a £26Bn "bulge" in future years that was never going to happen. My company was asked to delay contracts because the cash was in future years! We were then later criticised for being slow to deliver!

Sadly this had to be dealt with by someone.

Let's now hope the Politicians only commit the Military to ops that they are resourced for...
sbdorset is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 09:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Putin should be in no doubt that our collective defence is as strong as ever."

He is an idiot and in my view, that's a stupid thing to say. It's provocative. You can't really blame Putin for wanting to keep the West at arms length. To everybody else, we've just come across like a bunch of war mongers.

Russia's assistance may be needed in tackling the Islamic State and alienating them is not a good idea.
Typhoon93 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 10:49
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 554
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
So claiming that "I can take warsaw any time I like" is not a threat but "our defence is as strong as ever" is provocative?

Wow.
t43562 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 11:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
one is true and the other is not
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 11:42
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Putin is a good guy, far better than our so called leaders.
Under his rule the Russian forces seem to be doing rather well.
Ronald Reagan is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 11:54
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T4,

That wasn't a threat, it was a fact. If he wanted to, he could put troops on the ground, anywhere in the world. It doesn't, however, mean he will succeed. If he wanted to. He clearly doesn't. He just doesn't want to deal with the West's corrupt ways, and I'm inclined to agree with him.
Typhoon93 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 12:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
That wasn't a threat, it was a fact. If he wanted to, he could put troops on the ground, anywhere in the world. It doesn't, however, mean he will succeed. If he wanted to. He clearly doesn't. He just doesn't want to deal with the West's corrupt ways, and I'm inclined to agree with him.
So what you're saying is he prefers his own system of open honest Government, for the people, by the people!?

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 12:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He just doesn't want to deal with the West's corrupt ways, and I'm inclined to agree with him.
Typhoon, you are Ronald Reagan's long lost love child, and I claim my £5!

S-D
salad-dodger is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 13:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 759
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Being a fully paid-up cynic, I reckon the 2 Tornados are being sent to Akrotiri to be 'christmas tree'd' to keep the others going. But I hope I'm wrong (it has been known!).
FantomZorbin is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 14:23
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: scotland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
May have been covered already, is the Ground Attack version of the Typhoon mot CR?
KPax is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2014, 15:12
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May have been covered already, is the Ground Attack version of the Typhoon mot CR?
I think it's more than that though isn't it?
  • Can Typhoon carry Brimstone
  • Is the two crew team in the Tornado with Litening better for this role - combination of ISTAR and weapons delivery - than the single seat Typhoon.

Bit of a problem for the future if the latter of those points is correct.

S-D
salad-dodger is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.