Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Eurofighter, deburred holes (insufficiently)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Eurofighter, deburred holes (insufficiently)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2014, 02:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eurofighter, deburred holes (insufficiently)

From Germany:


bundeswehr.de: Eurofighter: Flugbetrieb der Luftwaffe aktuell nicht von industrieller Flugstundenreduzierung betroffen

The industry has established a manufacturing defect in a large number of holes on the rear fuselage of the aircraft Euro Fighter in the context of quality control. The reasons for this are inadequate deburring by the manufacturer BAE Systems.
Faults on Eurofighter rear fuselage. Insufficently deburred holes. and BAE seems to own the problem. Can this be true?

Last edited by Jetex_Jim; 1st Oct 2014 at 04:10.
Jetex_Jim is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 06:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
in English.

I'm amazed that this golden product has a workmanship deficiency. Outsource it to China perhaps for quality..!
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 09:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
German media is running a story where only 42 aircraft are fit for flight (with limitations) due to the fuselage issue with a further 67 grounded.

No apparent reaction from the other nations, so one wonders what the formal position is from the design organisation.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 10:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"De Buring",amazing! This is about the second thing one learns on a "Structures Course" to obtain a "Structures" ticket on a maint licence, how can this posibly slip by inspection/quality controll? Unbelivable, time to hire some ex- Halton Brats as inspectors!
clunckdriver is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 11:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Just when you thought it could get worse, it did:
German armed forces admit fighting machines are faulty, reports say | EUROPE ONLINE
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 11:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Are these deficiencies peacetime-unserviceable or wartime-unserviceable?

One of the problems, I suspect, is the politicians (in which you can include Very Senior Officers) mixing-and-matching what counts as war for different parts of the system.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 11:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like wow, it is almost like the F3 debacle all over again....
glad rag is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 11:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Or it could be nothing at all. We have heard nothing from the manufacturer involved, no apparent reaction from all the other operators and the article it comes from appears to blame the wrong company.

It all seems a bit odd.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 12:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 53
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never mind ex Halton brats, this basic mechanic knows that the second thing to do after squarely drilling a hole is to de-bur. Not read the story but at what point has this fault been found, must be more to it surely.
Bts70 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 12:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,338
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
And was the bloke whose job it is to stick something IN the non-deburred hole, not trained to check?

CG
charliegolf is online now  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 12:19
  #11 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
What sort of de burd holes are dees? Are dey pidjun holes?
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 16:47
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have heard nothing from the manufacturer involved, no apparent reaction from all the other operators and the article it comes from appears to blame the wrong company.
The article fingers BAE, they make the rear fuselage. Who should the article be blaming?

Mechanics of the British forces was first noticed the error. Therefore, no longer to let the machine so long fly the Royal Air Force decided. The Air Force will now join the British and the manufacturer's instructions and limit the life tim
From Spiegel, (Google translation)

No reaction? Fair's fair. It'll take a while to put a spin on this one.


Planned Obsolescence anyone?

Last edited by Jetex_Jim; 1st Oct 2014 at 17:05.
Jetex_Jim is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 21:06
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: lincoln
Age: 63
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never mind ex Halton brats, this basic mechanic knows that the second thing to do after squarely drilling a hole is to de-bur. Not read the story but at what point has this fault been found, must be more to it surely.


I'm an ex rigger after I left I worked for a civvie company doing major upgrades on the Tucano at Scampton.
Never mind "de burred" holes, on these things we found holes 6 inches wide that had been chain drilled out but that was it all the drilled edges were left "Ragged", Glad I did not fly in them
bill2b is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 22:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancashire
Age: 48
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the story behind F3s being butchered by carpenters, holes drilled all over then having to be cut and shut to get them flying again. I remember one of them crashing off Blackpool after Warton had to fix the issue.

Was it an MoD lowest bid refurb job???
Thelma Viaduct is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 22:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airwork did the butchers job on the F.3 centre fuselages, they used incorrect tools to remove jo-bolts, which resulted in structural damage. Good job plenty of F.2's were in store or else entire new centre fuselage sections would've needed to be manufactured!

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2014, 23:12
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Yep, Airwork won the bid, BAe too expensive. 16 frames with required center fuselages replacing nicked from the F2's that were in storage. from what one of my mates at Valley who was detached to help fix them in the mid 1990s told me (he also told me that it was damage to the wing boxes that meant the replacement of the center section, which given their method of construction would have been mega expensive to remake from scratch had the F2's not been available). Airwork blamed the MoD and BAe for issuing incorrect documentation. The links at the bottom of the Wiki entry about Airworks have all the details.

Airwork Services - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It looks like they won a contract for work on the RAF Hercs as well and made a mess of that.

Last edited by MAINJAFAD; 1st Oct 2014 at 23:26.
MAINJAFAD is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 06:41
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
Airwork blamed the MoD and BAe for issuing incorrect documentation.
Later confirmed in the Tornado Airworthiness Review Team (TART) report and other ARTs. The RAF Chief Engineer had issued instructions that documentation was not to be maintained, and pulled funding. Airworks would not have known this as the reports were only released recently. That policy meant that it was madness to let any such contract on anyone but the Aircraft Design Authority.

However, the terms "good engineering practice" and "tools of the trade" come to mind.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 06:42
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weston Super Mare/UAE
Age: 60
Posts: 406
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had better call Chris........you know, Chris De Burgh!!





Hat, coat......leaving
captainsmiffy is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 07:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Captainsmiffy - made me smile but I have ordered your taxi
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 11:56
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
However, the terms "good engineering practice" and "tools of the trade" come to mind.
They were for the car mechanics that Airwork were rumoured to have employed to do the task.
MAINJAFAD is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.