Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Sense of Humo(u)r failure?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Sense of Humo(u)r failure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Sep 2014, 15:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sense of Humo(u)r failure?

Apologies if already covered. Didn't see it posted.

I understand tradition and this can lead to copycat/one upmanship attempts, but c'mon.

Other than some additional marching/serious shouting at, is it that serious? Looks like a bored squaddie that can be cured with some remedial 'adult' language.

Completely unknowing about what the soldier's record actually is, so maybe this was his last chance. But if not...


Dancing Buckingham Palace Guard Faces Prison for Protocol Breach

And yes, I would not be amused to see our equivalent - The Old Guard at the Tomb of the Unknown - doing such.

But correcting such with formal punishment for a first infraction?
brickhistory is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 15:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Bar to Bar
Posts: 796
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
Discipline dear boy, discipline. If a soldier lacks the integrity of self discipline, it is for the Army to instil it in him whilst at the same time letting others know that indiscipline will not be tolerated. He knew full well that what he was doing was wrong and therefore it is for him to suffer the consequences. You, by your very words, say you would not be amused if this were to happen at the Tomb of the Unknown - I am equally unamused at this individual bringing my Nations Armed Forces reputation into disrepute, his actions in a high profile position in the public eye should have been beyond reproach. I have no sympathy.
Sloppy Link is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 15:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Just another erk
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 77
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He knows the rules, he broke them, deserves what ever punishment they give him.
ArthurR is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 16:02
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No argument against "discipline" and/or punishment for breaking the rules.

Proportionality and/or informal discipline as a better method than a court-martial?

In the larger picture, I guess I see more and more an inability for leadership's discretion on how to handle buffoonery rather than going the 'full Monty' with military legal proceedings.

In the old days, some 'wall to wall' counseling saved many a good soldier/airman from a bit of stupidity ending a career.
brickhistory is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 16:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a Canadian, let me see if Ive got this right, its OK for one of the Royal family children to run around nude with a bunch of Hookers whilst representing the UK on exchange as an officer with a foriegn airforce, but dare a non- member of the inbred English elite shows a bit of bad judjment you all want to crucify him? Canada moves ever closer to becoming a Republic every time this sort of crap makes the news!
clunckdriver is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 16:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South of France
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My dear Clunckdriver. It is the duty of young male royalty to run around naked, bedding wenches and generally being a cad - for a while at least. It is the role of a Guardsman to act like one.
strake is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 16:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 82
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is informal discipline? Code Red? He will not be court martialled. He will be dealt with summarily at unit level by his CO who can award 21 days and forfeiture of pay.

There goes his LSGC. Yes, amusing to watch but what does it say to the public about the standards of discipline and responsibility in his regiment and the UK armed forces? He has broken the code and has no honour! He'll regret his idiocy when he gets to MCTC.
Clockwork Mouse is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 16:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Proportionality and/or informal discipline as a better method than a court-martial?
In fact I dont think that a court martial will happen. Unless things have changed a lot since I was in, this offence can be dealt with by the soldier's commanding officer, and I think I am right in saying that he can be awarded up to 28 days detention (not imprisonment, although in effect that's what it is). Of course the soldier can elect to be tried by court martial, but as he is "bang to rights" I doubt if that would be a sensible choice!

Sorry Clockwork Mouse, you beat me to it!
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 16:49
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He will be dealt with summarily at unit level by his CO who can award 21 days and forfeiture of pay.
Which is absolutely fine and what I hope for.

I assumed that taking money took a formal court-martial which would be OTT, in my opinion.
brickhistory is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 16:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: in my combat underpants
Age: 53
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But correcting such with formal punishment for a first infraction?
There are levels of formal punishment ranging from 'do some crap jobs in your own time' to 'go to prison'. Why should that system not be used? The sliding scale of formal punishment has an according effect upon his record.
Mr C Hinecap is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 16:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
As 'Clockwork Mouse' says, this won't go to court martial, but for such a public breach of discipline, punishment must be seen to have been carried out.

If the Guardsmen was caught dicking about solely by an NCO out of the public eye then I'm sure a bit of "wall to wall" counselling as you put it 'Brickhistory' would be adequate. Dicking about in front of one of the most photographed/filmed buildings in London, and allowing evidence of such actions to be broadcast around the world, is a slightly different matter.

This is a Guardsman who is a member of the Household Division on Ceremonial Duties. The very title Guardsman implies what he should be doing, not acting like a ****.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 17:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stacker, how can he guard anything with half a dead bear on his head, obscuring his vision and no live rounds up the spout? What next, no "zapping" visiting aircraft, wearing red hairpieces on April the first? {this done by a well known Air Force display team} Ah, but we in the in the "Empire" must remember that there are two sets of rules in the UK, one for the elite, and one for the "Great Unwashed", cant wait for the day we dump the whole royalty crap! {Ex RCAF Aircrew by the way.}
clunckdriver is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 17:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: eastcoastoz
Age: 76
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heavens no!
Bliar and Camoron are the only officially approved British clowns allowed on the world stage right now.

After severely reprimanding him, I'd have bought him a pint.
(But then, I'm only an old Sar' Major from the colonies, perhaps I'm a bit out of date.)


.

Last edited by Stanwell; 15th Sep 2014 at 18:13.
Stanwell is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 18:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,366
Received 546 Likes on 148 Posts
Clunckdriver

Jesus Christ fella. Would you like some mayo with that enormous chip?!
BV
Bob Viking is online now  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 18:09
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another web site reported that he was awarded 21 days inside - I don't claim the information is correct, however (that's the Interweb for you!).
P6 Driver is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 18:21
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I don't have a huge amount of sympathy. Mainly because of the stupidity of doing something so obvious!
I do think it's a leap to suggest he's got no honour though!


Posted from Pprune.org App for Android
Tashengurt is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 18:21
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 82
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clunckdriver

OK, we get it. You favour a republic rather than a constitutional monarchy for the UK. But wait a minute, you aren't a brit, so what are you worried about and why are you being so bloody rude about our system and the members of the Royal Family?

if you want Canada to renounce the British Monarch as your titular head and sever the relationship with the UK, then vote for it. We brits won't object. in the meantime wash your mouth out and stop being an arse.
Clockwork Mouse is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 18:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 82
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tashengurt

"I do think it's a leap to suggest he's got no honour though!"

Just watched "A Few Good Men" on Sky so I was talking the talk! Code Red. Code. Honor. Great film!
Clockwork Mouse is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 18:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Stacker, how can he guard anything with half a dead bear on his head, obscuring his vision and no live rounds up the spout?
"No live rounds"? An odd version of live armed guard that one.

What next, no "zapping" visiting aircraft, wearing red hairpieces on April the first? {this done by a well known Air Force display team}
Was that done in full view of the general public and broadcast around the world?

Ah, but we in the in the "Empire" must remember that there are two sets of rules in the UK, one for the elite, and one for the "Great Unwashed", cant wait for the day we dump the whole royalty crap! {Ex RCAF Aircrew by the way.}
(Not that it has much bearing to a serviceman dicking around in public whilst on guard but I'll humour you..) so its only the 'Empire' that has examples of different rules for the elite is it?

The land of my birth has as much if not more inequality than the land in which I serve. Perhaps its not a Republicanism/Royalty thing huh?

Are you sure you're not a French-Canadian? You sure whine like one.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 18:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There's a difference between detention and imprisonment. Not much a difference, mind.

This guy (according to arrse) got 21 days' detention. For any non-UK pers, this means 21 days in jail. As it was over 14 days, he would probably have served this in the Military Corrective Training Centre. Which is not quite a prison. But does lock the miscreants up at night and finds tiring military training for them to do during the day.

The prisoners are not paid, therefore they are effectively fined, although the CO can award a fine as well as detention. Periods in detention have to be "paid back" at the end of one's service too, so when the guy gives notice to leave, he would have to do another 3 weeks (paid) to account for his "non-service" over and above the notice period.
Roadster280 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.