Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Sense of Humo(u)r failure?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Sense of Humo(u)r failure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Sep 2014, 19:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
Very little distinction between detention and prison since 2009 as even summary hearings can see you with a civilian criminal record.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 19:21
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: eastcoastoz
Age: 76
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, a criminal record - that's great, isn't it?
What goes on in the services should stay in the services.

Some of the worst clowns on the parade ground have been the ones
that have saved our @rses when things became, er.., difficult.
In fact, I personally owe my life to one of them.


Just kick his @rse and let him learn from it, that's all.
.
Stanwell is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 20:04
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This

Very little distinction between detention and prison since 2009 as even summary hearings can see you with a civilian criminal record.
and this

Just kick his @rse and let him learn from it, that's all.
were my points succinctly made by these comments.
brickhistory is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 20:12
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This whole matter was done and dusted before this thread started.
ARRSE were all over this, and as usual had mixed levels of support for this guardsman.
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 20:14
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apologies (as stated in OP). Hadn't seen it and not a member of the forum you mentioned.

Still, it has gone to page two, so perhaps not completely covered...
brickhistory is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 21:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chaps, let's not forget - it's not (not) the Royal Army by coincidence.

I'd be curious as to his motivation, that must have a bearing on things, surely. Either way, I'm sure that that measure of success these days (his facebook activity) will have gone through the roof.

Of course, if the Queen's Colour Sqn had been on the job that day, the public may have been spared the sight of the woodentops letting the side down.
Al R is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 21:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,340
Received 62 Likes on 45 Posts
He knows the rules, he broke them, deserves what ever punishment they give him.
As did the piano burners (high spirits), secret laptop losers et al?

I think not.

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 01:29
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Al R
Chaps, let's not forget - it's not (not) the Royal Army by coincidence.

...

Of course, if the Queen's Colour Sqn had been on the job that day, the public may have been spared the sight of the woodentops letting the side down.
Ok, I'll bite.

1. The Household Division are the Sovereign's personal troops. They don't need to be "Royal"; they already are, by definition.

2. QCS's raison d'être is related to the RAF, not the Royal Household. The Colour is presented to the RAF, and the QCS guard it. An internal role, if you will. Yes, I am well aware that they have guarded the Palaces, Windsor and the Tower. But so have the TA and the RCMP.

3. I agree that said wooden top needed his arrse kicked and so it came to pass. 21 days in clink. Clanngg, mind your fingers.

Sorted. Next.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 01:53
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If he'd been an Aussie Digger (Australian Serviceman - noted for their thumbing of their collective noses at "protocol" and "royalty" and anyone with their head so far up their ar$e, they can see their esophagus), he'd have certainly have been disciplined as well.
However, in the AMF, he'd probably get 14 days CB for "conduct to the prejudice of good order and discipline".

14 days CB means you're Confined to Barracks, and you have to spend some serious amounts of time jogging around a parade ground or up a nearby hill wearing full pack. It's designed to curtail enthusiasm for "pranks" - and it largely works.

Being jailed for 21 days seems to me to be a little over-the-top and unproductive. Being yelled drill instructions by a senior NCO who would rather be elsewhere, than drilling undisciplined members of the forces, is a better way of instilling the discipline that the unruly member lacked.

Instilling self-discipline via the application of external discipline has been the modus operandi of all disciplined military forces since time began.

The clown behaviour whilst on parade, and on public display, shows an inclination towards juvenile behaviour - not the behaviour of a responsible adult who exercises self-discipline.
onetrack is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 02:32
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by onetrack
If he'd been an Aussie Digger (Australian Serviceman - noted for their thumbing of their collective noses at "protocol" and "royalty" and anyone with their head so far up their ar$e, they can see their esophagus), he'd have certainly have been disciplined as well.
However, in the AMF, he'd probably get 14 days CB for "conduct to the prejudice of good order and discipline".

14 days CB means you're Confined to Barracks, and you have to spend some serious amounts of time jogging around a parade ground or up a nearby hill wearing full pack. It's designed to curtail enthusiasm for "pranks" - and it largely works.

Being jailed for 21 days seems to me to be a little over-the-top and unproductive. Being yelled drill instructions by a senior NCO who would rather be elsewhere, than drilling undisciplined members of the forces, is a better way of instilling the discipline that the unruly member lacked.

Instilling self-discipline via the application of external discipline has been the modus operandi of all disciplined military forces since time began.

The clown behaviour whilst on parade, and on public display, shows an inclination towards juvenile behaviour - not the behaviour of a responsible adult who exercises self-discipline.
Disagree. Military jail is not like civvy jail. He will most certainly have spent his 21 days being yelled at by SNCOs. A whole Corps of them, the Military Provost Staff Corps, who run the Military Corrective Training Centre. A whole world of hurt for 3 weeks. Drill, PT, battle PT, polishing and pressing anything and everything.

"CB" is somewhat similar to "Jankers' or Restriction of Privileges. Detention is basically the same thing 24 x 7 rather than just before and after normal work. Yes, ROPs is a ballache because you have to do both that and normal work, but not in the same league as detention.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 02:44
  #31 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This may have been the soldiers first step at orchestrating his own medical discharge, (with disability pension etc. etc.).
parabellum is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 05:29
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,601
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
The Guardsman failed to conduct his duties in a professional manner - his duties on this occasion were (ceremonial) guard duties. He's not been court martialed - he's been subject to summary justice from his CO for failing to carry out his duties. Simple.

And I can assure you that service personnel who f&ck up in the Mess or lose a laptop are dealt with pretty severely these days.
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 05:56
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dead Dog Land
Age: 77
Posts: 531
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I think you will find that the guardsman was sentenced to 21 days and he "did his time" in the regimental cells, not a Military Prison. If his sentence extended to over 28 days, he would have automatically been sent to a prison. It is not uncommon for Army C.O.s to sentence offenders to 27 days 23 hours and 59 minutes to keep things in house.


As to comparing his antics to piano burning and other "high jinks", the answer is simple, high jinks applied to commissioned aircrew. If I, or any of my non commissioned colleagues, had behaved the same way towards NAAFI furniture, chopped up and burnt a second hand piano or built and discharged a "mess cannon", it would have been a whole different ball game.
The Oberon is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 06:16
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
???

...how has this all ended up in the Military Aviation section of a web site for professional aviators

It's an ARRSE issue and should have stayed over there; personally think the mods should move or bin it.
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 09:16
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
sprintman - I've started noticing your posts of late, and having read a few, I think it's about time you came out and made an honest admission

You really don't like Britain or the Brits much, do you?

Still, having read Bill Bryson's description of Canberra in Down Under I can understand why you're bitter.

Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 10:40
  #36 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
I suspect that parabellum might have got it right. "Sorry doctor, it's the voices in my head that told me to do it"
Herod is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 11:00
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,601
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
As to comparing his antics to piano burning and other "high jinks", the answer is simple, high jinks applied to commissioned aircrew. If I, or any of my non commissioned colleagues, had behaved the same way towards NAAFI furniture, chopped up and burnt a second hand piano or built and discharged a "mess cannon", it would have been a whole different ball game.
Mess hi-jinks are very much in the past. There is, I believe, very little tolerance of criminal damage (I make the distinction here) in Messes these days. But then mess-life is oxymoronic; the messes I've been to over the last couple of months have been dire: crap accommodation, crap food, crap service, deathly quiet bars - everyone is in their room on t'internet, it seems. There are good messes - probably on training establishments - but their days as some sort of exclusive club are well and truly passed.
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 11:44
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bob Viking

I agree. I find it offensive that he referred to us as 'inbred'.

As for the Guardsman, he broke protocol so he should be punished by his CO, but certainly not dealt with by a court martial. Ruining a persons life for five minutes of stupidity that at the end of the day, hasn't and isn't likely to hurt anyone but his self and his medal count, is over the top.

Clunk, for the record, the rounds in the weapon are live.

PS. The blade of the bayonet is sharp too!
Typhoon93 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 12:49
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Oberon - it is no longer 28 days, the cutoff has been 14 days since 2006, so Gdsm Nureyev would have most likely have gone to the Motor Cycle Training Centre to have his sense of duty improved for him.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 14:12
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,340
Received 62 Likes on 45 Posts
As to comparing his antics to piano burning and other "high jinks", the answer is simple, high jinks applied to commissioned aircrew. If I, or any of my non commissioned colleagues, had behaved the same way towards NAAFI furniture, chopped up and burnt a second hand piano or built and discharged a "mess cannon", it would have been a whole different ball game.
I was alluding to double standards, not suggesting like for like.

CG
charliegolf is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.