Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Black Hawk upgrades

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Black Hawk upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Aug 2014, 21:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,276
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Black Hawk upgrades

This makes you wonder why the Australian Army isn't keeping a couple of dozen Black Hawks for Special Ops and other logistic support tasks...
UH-60V: Upgraded Avionics Coming to Legacy Black Hawks

Aug 17, 2014 18:06 UTC by Defense Industry Daily staff
UH-60V Cockpit
(click to view full)
The US military is ordering new UH-60M Black Hawk utility helicopters at a rapid clip, but it still has a large legacy fleet of UH-60Ls. Upgrading UH-60L performance etc. isn’t cost-effective, but upgrading their avionics to a common standard will save money by cutting down on training, removing dependence on out-of-production parts, etc. As a bonus, new digital technologies take up less space, weigh less, and draw less power. Northrop Grumman has been picked for the program.

The US Army intends to upgrade 700 – 900 UH-60Ls this way, turning them into UH-60Vs with a pilot interface that’s essentially identical to the UH-60M. Northrop Grumman says that the new avionics are aligned with the Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE), which began as a US NAVAIR standard for avionics interoperability and software portability, but has spread through the Pentagon as intended. As part of that commitment, Northrop Grumman is providing full, unlimited government purpose rights to technical data and software. Sources: NGC, “Northrop Grumman Selected to Modernize Black Hawk Cockpit for US Army”.
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2014, 21:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBM

Agree, but go back one step further, did we really need to change makes ?
500N is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2014, 22:58
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,276
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
There is an obsession in defence to limit the number of types in all spheres regardless of the fact that most multi-role thingies are top of the class in anything.

Is it reasonable to use an F-35 for CAS or an MRH-90 for moving things and minor people for administrative tasks vs. keeping Black Hawks for those roles and special ops in and around built up areas eg.?
TBM-Legend is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.