Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Future Combat Aircraft Programme

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Future Combat Aircraft Programme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jul 2014, 16:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,368
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
RAF Future Combat Aircraft Programme

Reaper to be retained - and debate on the update and/or replacement of Typhoon.

Defence News: Reapers To Join UK's Core Equipment Program

LONDON — The British Ministry of Defence has confirmed it is to take the Royal Air Force’s fleet of 10 MQ-9 Reapers into its core equipment program following the end of combat operations in Afghanistan.

“The Defence Board recently gave approval for funding to allow the Reaper capability to be maintained until the Scavenger [program] enters service towards the end of the decade; plans for this bridging capability are currently under development,” the government announced July 29 in response to an earlier parliamentary defense committee report on remotely piloted air vehicles.

The government also said in its response to the committee that a national program being undertaken to look at the mix of future combat air requirements from 2030 could include a “new-build manned aircraft.”

The RAF has a fleet of 10 of the General Atomics built Reapers. The first of the machines was delivered to the British in 2007, purchased to meet an urgent operational requirement for intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance capabilities to support military activities in Afghanistan. The remotely piloted air systems were purchased from a special Treasury reserve and not the MoD’s own budget. The decision to make the equipment a permanent part of RAF’s core equipment program required, amongst other things, changes to funding responsibilities.

The Scavenger program is in the assessment phase. The system is aimed at delivering a sovereign armed remotely piloted air system capability for the UK toward the end of the decade, said the government in its response to the defense committee. A decision on the way forward will likely be taken in the next strategic defense and security review (SDSR) set to take place after the next election in May 2015.

In addition to the Reaper becoming part of the permanent order of battle, the government also laid out its plans for bringing other unmanned air systems into the core program. “Of the existing UAS currently used on operations in Afghanistan by the Army [Hermes 450, Desert Hawk 3, T-Hawk and Black Hornet] it is our intention that the Desert Hawk 3 and Black Hornet are retained,” said the government. A final decision on bringing the systems into the core is expected to be taken by the British Army Investment Board this summer, said the government.

The response from the government also raised the possibility of a new manned aircraft joining the RAF fleet post 2030.

“A two-year national future combat air system (FCAS) program has been launched which aims to inform the forthcoming SDSR on the most appropriate force mix of platforms and systems in order to meet the future combat air requirement from 2030. A unmanned air combat vehicle along the lines of Taranis is one potential element of this force mix, along with an additional buy of Lightning II (F-35), a Typhoon life extension or an alternative new build manned aircraft,” said the government.......
ORAC is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2014, 17:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What's that, a future combat aircraft for when the F35 does not work?...................OK, I give in, hat, coat, Omega at the door.......
Wander00 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2014, 18:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Drone news - who gives a $**t?

BEagle is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2014, 18:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Drone drivers. And probably kids just graduating from primary into big school who think they may want to be a mud-mover.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 13:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 523
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
From the same report...

UK sets out post-2030 combat aviation force structure - IHS Jane's 360
Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 14:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: home for good
Posts: 494
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Drone news - who gives a $**t?"

er - non-drone drivers who will now have a smaller MoD pot to take from?
Sandy Parts is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 07:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"-who gives a sh**?" -er, anyone with any interest in the thread topic?
ShotOne is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 19:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Drone news - who gives a $**t?
Bitter PAS "mates" who are about going to be made unemployed?
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2014, 07:38
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 655
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Bitter PAS "mates" who are about going to be made unemployed?
I'm neither Reaper or PAS but as I understand it, all F/L PAS aircrew and sqn ldr aircrew upwards will be given to offer to extend to the age of 60 from 1 Apr 15. So other than the SAR helo boys, who exactly are you referring to in the 'going to be made unemployed' comment?
Party Animal is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2014, 08:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: home for good
Posts: 494
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Party - I've no inside info but as we've not yet seen how SDSR15 will balance the books for these costs, "there may be trouble ahead" to quote the song! I'm guessing aircraft types with diminishing years of service remaining and no current role may be looked at closely in a 'cost vs benefit' way?
Having an offer to extend / being on a 'contract' to 55 / 60 doesn't mean you won't be made redundant if the bean-counters say so. Recent experience directly proves this.
Sandy Parts is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.