Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

A-6 intruder-thrust vectoring.

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

A-6 intruder-thrust vectoring.

Old 7th Jul 2014, 01:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,067
Received 43 Likes on 28 Posts
A-6 intruder-thrust vectoring.

Interesting


The A-6 Intruder Was Originally Designed With Thrust Vectoring
West Coast is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 02:48
  #2 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,437
Received 89 Likes on 50 Posts
Wow. Never knew that.
Buster Hyman is online now  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 08:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: In the middle
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
''The jet already had a large and relatively thick ring, but the STOL requirement would require more innovation''


Is this some sort of naval aviation requirement.......?!
4ROCK is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 10:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,230
Received 49 Likes on 18 Posts
Very interesting.

I like some of the articles on this guy's site, and at the risk of going off topic it's hard to disagree with him when he suggests that aircraft such as subsonic A-6s and A-7s would have been far more useful over Iraq and Afghanistan than faster pointy nosed jets.

Mind, with the latest scheme to retire the A-10 the USAF don't seem to agree...
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 11:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft like the A-6 and A-7 would be more use as bomb trucks in Iraq and Afganistan but they have one issue that a pointy jet such as the Hornet and Super Hornet that do their job today, they can't defend themselves. A pointy jet can drop bombs and fly as a fighter, it may not carry bombs as well a bomb truck but the bomb truck can't act as a fighter. With limited money to buy aircraft you might aswell just by fighters and live with the compromise.
dat581 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 11:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neither can the A-10 and that did the job OK.
500N is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 15:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chasing Dreams
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting article, not a fan of the line

"...and was certainly a forerunner of things to come with the famous Harrier Jump Jet years later, an aircraft that used rotating nozzles with fantastic results. "

The P.1127 first flew in Mid 1960, roughly the same time as the YA2 did.

Would be interested to know the effect of the vectored thrust on a CAT launch.
Jimmy Macintosh is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 16:33
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,067
Received 43 Likes on 28 Posts
Neither can the A-10 and that did the job OK.
The A-10 is capable of defending itself with the gun and AIM-9, the A-6 while it could also carry the AIM-9, their crews only dreamed they could manuever as well as the Hog. The A-10 is also a product of a timeframe when dual role wasn't as emphasized as it is 1980s and beyond.
The thought of not a pound for air to ground is largely history.

Last edited by West Coast; 7th Jul 2014 at 16:44.
West Coast is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 16:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,118
Received 151 Likes on 77 Posts
Any combat aircraft can defend itself if it has to - Sandy vs MiGs anyone?
melmothtw is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 16:46
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,067
Received 43 Likes on 28 Posts
That's kinda a "yeah, but.." Statement

Of course they do.
West Coast is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 17:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some good discussion about the A-7F, A-10, and F-16 and how they all came to be or not be what they are today?

Can We Learn Something From The Defunct A-7F "Strikefighter?"
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 21:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any fighter pilot worthy of that title will just sit back and take BVR shots at strike aircraft. If he gets in close enough for an A-10 to use it's gun then he is an idiot. Same deal with the AIM-9
dat581 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2014, 00:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You mean "interceptor Pilot" I think.....fighter pilots will be gunning it going for the Kill!
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2014, 01:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rubbish. Fighter pilot 101: fight to your advantages not the enemy's. Any fighter pilot that deliberately goes into a dogfight when he can avoid it and shot the enemy at long range with no danger to himself is reckless and stupid. (Barring any restrictive rules of engagement or other restriction on firing BVR missiles).
dat581 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2014, 04:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not much of a "Fight"! Heck fire, a Drone Operator can do that. Think not, arm up a QF-4 or QF-16 then hide and watch!
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2014, 04:32
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you been drinking today?
dat581 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2014, 03:50
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eight manufacturers submitted eleven proposals to meet specification CA-10504 issued on 2 Oct 1956, which included a Marine Corp requirement for STOL operations from unimproved airstrips. The requirement called for a 1,500 foot take off over a 50 foot obstacle. Lift off speed with nozzles deflected was 78 to 86 knots for a lightweight aircraft.

Test pilot Bob Smyth cites - The tail pipes normally bent down 7° with respect to the fuselage reference line, but to satisfy the Marine Corp STOL requirement a hydraulic actuator, controlled by a knurled knob on the outboard throttle, could deflect the nozzles down to 30° (23° of travel). There was no trim change, and they reduced the stall speed by five knots, or for a given approach speed they reduced the angle of attack by 3°. Only the first seven aircraft were so fitted, as they were found to be only marginally effective in meeting the Marine Corp requirement. Actually, the concept would have worked well on the heavyweight EA-6B.

"Intruder - The Operational History of Grumman's A-6", Mark & Rick Morgan
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 18:02
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A-6 was cleared for (and did on occasion in Vietnam) carry (and fire) the 20mm external gun pod.

Hey, if it's good enough for F-4s, its good enough for the "Sky Pig"!

And West Coast - the A-6 was more maneuverable than you think.

No, it couldn't keep with the A-10 through rolls & turns, but it was more maneuverable than the F-4s that didn't have the maneuvering slats - and no one says the Phantom II couldn't do air-air!
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 18:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A-6 could use "Noise" all by itself to deafen the Enemy!
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 18:43
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,121
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Lot of that about...
diginagain is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.