Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF A2A Engagements questioned by SNP Minister

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF A2A Engagements questioned by SNP Minister

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2014, 11:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF A2A Engagements questioned by SNP Minister

Can't think of any real reason for this being asked in the House unless Angus Robertson is a numbers collector?
Were there no BVR engagements in Granby or Telic?

Hansard/They Work For You
TheWizard is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 12:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He's been listening to Sharkey.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 12:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
Questioning whether the future Scottish Air Force need fighters equipped with BVR armament?
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 12:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: North of Hadrians Wall
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somebody has pointed to some weakness in his defense plan.

He'll be asking about radars next.
OilCan is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 13:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or maybe he has just noticed Raytheon are in Scotland and might have to move south in case of independence. The same SNP defence spokesman that complained of "contracts for the fast jets going to France".
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 13:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Robertson has been banging away for some time on F35 VFM, some of which is predicated on its ability to win a BVR (vice a close-in visual) engagement.

Anyone would think he'd been reading (or been fed) those reports that suggest F35 is a bit less manoeuvrable than an F16........
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 13:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Since he has demanded a Fatal Accident Inquiry into the 2 Tornados which crashed in the Moray Firth, then he is probably leading into what DMB decided to spend money on instead of the CWS they said they would buy back in '98. F35 could also be a possibility.
He already knew very well what the answer would be, hence the choice of 30 years in the question.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 16:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's a bit of a broken process whereby an Opposition MP can ask a ministerial question, and then use that official reply to beat the minister/other government department up about something only tenuously connected. One might use the negative reply to justify an assertion that the money would have better spent on hospitals/education/protected newts/dole.

A bit like PMQs where the 1st question relates to the PM's diary and then the follow ups are an unconnected political ambush.

No wonder politicians are poorly thought of.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 16:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The problem is the Government (whatever party)
Only by asking a written question can they force the Government to actually answer the question.
If Ministers were obliged to give answers in debate, rather than bull**** or dodging the question as they almost universally do, then written questions could be reserved for their proper purpose.
Ministers could be pre-advised of factual matters on which they will be questioned in debate, to allow proper time for response from departments.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 16:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good points; agreed.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 17:02
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Del, greatest air to air risk in Telic was, a mid-air!

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 18:04
  #12 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,393
Received 1,585 Likes on 722 Posts
Or maybe he has just noticed Raytheon are in Scotland and might have to move south in case of independence.
Raytheon HQ is in the USA; Raytheon UK HQ is in London; the military divisions are scattered around Farnborough, Portsmouth, Waddington and other points south. Glenrothes specialises in high Temperature silicon carbide chips and other civil integrated electronics components - a world leader but not a market where independence would instantly force the American HQ to relocate it south - frankly I doubt the staff would move.

Better off looking at companies like Marconi whose Avionics Radar and Countermeasure Systems is based in Edinburgh and, amongst other things, is responsible for the Typhoon ECR90 radar.....
ORAC is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 19:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 661
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better off looking at companies like Marconi whose Avionics Radar and Countermeasure Systems is based in Edinburgh and, amongst other things, is responsible for the Typhoon ECR90 radar.....
Their portfolio is impressive when other projects are included - notably F35. I guess the infrastructure of what is basically an avionics company is reasonably mobile, even the production facilities - its the people that might not want to move, but then again perhaps the dedication and interest in the technology might be enough.

I wonder what points the SNP are looking to score. You can be sure they aren't likely to be wanting to praise recent defence policies or acquisition decisions!
JFZ90 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2014, 11:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Not far from EGPH.
Posts: 117
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better off looking at companies like Marconi whose Avionics Radar and Countermeasure Systems is based in Edinburgh and, amongst other things, is responsible for the Typhoon ECR90 radar.....
Must have been a while since you were in Edinburgh
Marconi is now Selex ES, and ECR90 is now Captor!

(Good point though! )
XR219 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2014, 11:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Coningsby
Age: 72
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most of the work carried out at Selex-es Edinburgh is secret UK Eyes only,rumor has it most(all?) of the work would head back down south of the border?
flyingbanana is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.