Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

CHINOOK Mk6 UNVEILLING

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

CHINOOK Mk6 UNVEILLING

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jun 2014, 13:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: scotland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CHINOOK Mk6 UNVEILLING

With the unveilling of the Mk6 Chinook today is this a step forward for the SH force and the RAF, also what progress on the Merlin becoming Junglie.
KPax is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2014, 17:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pastures new
Posts: 354
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Interesting question KPax. No doubt the Mk 6 will bring additional capabilities in poor vis ops but some of the real show stoppers (poor icing clearance, low millilux operations) won't be addressed by the introduction of this new model. Interestingly there are some impressive developments that are available for helicopters (and Chinook in particular) that MOD have chosen not to buy. Goodness knows how MOD intends to employ 60 airframes. The total costed flying hours for the fleet in the future are unlikely to be as high as on current ops ....send for the mothballs!
kintyred is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2014, 21:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 463
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
CHINOOK Mk6 UNVEILLING

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/raf-contemplates-further-chinook-upgrade-as-hc6-variant-400454/
chinook240 is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2014, 21:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
CHINOOK Mk6 UNVEILLING

Kintyred,

Wasn't the thinking at one time that they might be direct replacements for the Merlins and that 28 & 78 would re-role?
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2014, 22:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,892
Received 2,831 Likes on 1,209 Posts
What is a "features a machined monolithic airframe" ? Does that mean less nails in the structure... How comes a mk6 when we update as HC1 etc
NutLoose is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2014, 22:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pastures new
Posts: 354
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Melchett, that may well have been the case but ever since I joined the fleet many moons ago there have always been plans to reorganise or rebadge. The Army put up a case to have them in the AAC in the late 80s for example. As you may recall, the Merlin was a political buy against the wishes of the MOD. A subsequent RAF review into cost savings in the SH fleet concluded that it would be cheaper to mothball the Merlins and with the savings on the through-life servicing costs buy and run another squadron of Chinooks...with the attendant increase in lift capacity! Interestingly there was a move to "marinise" the Chinook about 15 years ago so that it could be embarked. It involved a blade folding mechanism which required increasing the chord width to 49" IIRC!
From the above it's fair to conclude that the Navy have long been keen to have improved embarked helicopter capability and the the RAF has been ambivalent about the Merlin so it probably suited both services to operate one fleet each.
kintyred is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2014, 22:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pastures new
Posts: 354
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Come on Nutloose, don't ask foolish questions. Everyone knows that management speak is designed to baffle brains.....or maybe the Chinook really is hewn out of a single block of granite!

The original version was an HC Mark 1 and the latest is an HC Mark 6.
kintyred is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2014, 05:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 463
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
What is a "features a machined monolithic airframe" ? etc
http://ncdmm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Innovations-06-0102-07.pdf

Last edited by chinook240; 17th Jun 2014 at 05:50.
chinook240 is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2014, 10:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 146
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks chinook240. Very interesting article. I would love to see some of the new shapes and how they differ to the present built-up structures.
Dark Helmet is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2014, 22:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,892
Received 2,831 Likes on 1,209 Posts
Thanks Chinook, I do wonder how it will compare in use for BDR etc. 50lbs doesn't seem a whole lot in the scheme of things.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2014, 22:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
So...more cracking on Frame 47 then!? (I think it was Frame 47? - Fwd Transport Joint)
Rigga is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2014, 05:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
The article says "feasible without cost increase" but there'll be creative accounting in there somewhere. It won't apply to retro-fit so not coming to a squadron near you very soon. An expensive way of losing 50lbs on an old airframe. Better to send the crew on a 5 mile run every morning.
dervish is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.