What would have PPruners thought...?
Thread Starter
What would have PPruners thought...?
I've been re- reading Andrew Boyle's Trenchard (Collins, London, 1962). So many of the arguments and struggles he faced during the founding and subsequent decade of the RAF are familiar today - calls for merging with the other Services, lack of investment et seq.
One thing that did catch my eye was a brief description of LARYNX - a high speed unmanned monoplane, designed as a flying bomb. Test flights brought promising results, in part, and testing was moved to Iraq after parts of the fuselage was found by a French naval vessel (who passed on their condolences for not locating the crew). the Air Staff championed this device, which could outrun fighters of the time and work was in train for a 450 knot version. The Cabinet (apparently because of Admiralty pressure) pulled funding. The Air Staff expressed concern about the impact similar missiles might have 'of an enemy in control of the coastline of Northern France'.
Given the recent spate about ' Remember when there was an Air Force...' What would have PPruners of the 1920s have said about 'batteries of catapults, fixed and mobile' flinging unmanned combat aircraft replacing the night bomber force?
One thing that did catch my eye was a brief description of LARYNX - a high speed unmanned monoplane, designed as a flying bomb. Test flights brought promising results, in part, and testing was moved to Iraq after parts of the fuselage was found by a French naval vessel (who passed on their condolences for not locating the crew). the Air Staff championed this device, which could outrun fighters of the time and work was in train for a 450 knot version. The Cabinet (apparently because of Admiralty pressure) pulled funding. The Air Staff expressed concern about the impact similar missiles might have 'of an enemy in control of the coastline of Northern France'.
Given the recent spate about ' Remember when there was an Air Force...' What would have PPruners of the 1920s have said about 'batteries of catapults, fixed and mobile' flinging unmanned combat aircraft replacing the night bomber force?
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 433 Likes
on
228 Posts
I'm not sure about the 1920s but years ago I read that trials were done at RAF Upavon with an unmanned Tiger Moth. In front of the assembled throng of bigwigs it took off then crashed in a heap not many yards further one. One bigwig, who had a stutter, was heard to exclaim "I could throw my b...b.. bloody umbrella further than that!"
Ah. Shy Torque!
That was allegedly the A.T. Aerial Target in 1917 ( "Target" being the cover name for "Torpedo" ).
On another occasion , so the story goes, it looped straight off of the launcher, sending numerous senior onlookers scattering over Salisbury Plain.
P.S. "Professor" A.M. Low, who was a major instigator behind this machine's concept , subsequently went on to be involved in the "Larynx" project.
That was allegedly the A.T. Aerial Target in 1917 ( "Target" being the cover name for "Torpedo" ).
On another occasion , so the story goes, it looped straight off of the launcher, sending numerous senior onlookers scattering over Salisbury Plain.
P.S. "Professor" A.M. Low, who was a major instigator behind this machine's concept , subsequently went on to be involved in the "Larynx" project.
Last edited by Haraka; 22nd Apr 2014 at 09:11.
Boyle's "Trenchard" was issued to Flight Cadets in the days before Cranwell went comprehensive.
.
,
,
,
, Some might even have read it.
N.B. the motto lads :
Work hard!: Play hard!: Trenchard! ( The B*stard!)
.
,
,
,
, Some might even have read it.
N.B. the motto lads :
Work hard!: Play hard!: Trenchard! ( The B*stard!)
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 433 Likes
on
228 Posts
Haraka, there may have been such a project but the story I read about was definitely a Tiger Moth derivative and it was in Flight International magazine. I believe these pilotless aircraft versions were known as the "Queen Bee". 
Shy Torque
Certainly the AT was trialled at Upavon in 1917.
The Larynx (which was indeed an attack platform) , in 1925 or so , pre-dated the "Queen Bee" by several years.
This, in the 30's, looked a lot like a Tiger Moth ( although strictly speaking it was more a derivative of the "Moth Major") and as, mainly Naval, AAA aerial targets, rather than attack systems , most of their operations were coastal , or out at sea.
Either way , it's possibly an apocryphal story , as the version told to me used "s-s-s-stick" , rather than "umbrella" .
I would be very interested in any reference to Flight's text version, as mine came purely from conversations during my initial involvement with RPVs, many years ago now.
Certainly the AT was trialled at Upavon in 1917.
The Larynx (which was indeed an attack platform) , in 1925 or so , pre-dated the "Queen Bee" by several years.
This, in the 30's, looked a lot like a Tiger Moth ( although strictly speaking it was more a derivative of the "Moth Major") and as, mainly Naval, AAA aerial targets, rather than attack systems , most of their operations were coastal , or out at sea.
Either way , it's possibly an apocryphal story , as the version told to me used "s-s-s-stick" , rather than "umbrella" .
I would be very interested in any reference to Flight's text version, as mine came purely from conversations during my initial involvement with RPVs, many years ago now.
WYU,
1920s PPRuNers would have said, "Tush!!! Ridiculous, ungentlemanly nonsense!!! We need knights of the skies manning our aeroplanes. If we deploy this monstrosity we'll have the great unwashed rioting outside the gates of RAF Waddington!!!"
But, of course, they would have been so unenlightened in those days. It would never happen now.
1920s PPRuNers would have said, "Tush!!! Ridiculous, ungentlemanly nonsense!!! We need knights of the skies manning our aeroplanes. If we deploy this monstrosity we'll have the great unwashed rioting outside the gates of RAF Waddington!!!"
But, of course, they would have been so unenlightened in those days. It would never happen now.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Hope you don't mind ... but a little here on Queen Bee Tigers 
Flight International 27/2/53 Page 247 (bottom).
Flight : Queen Bee Tiger Moth
Flight International 27/2/53 Page 247 (bottom).
Originally Posted by Flight
In addition, it had become the first full-scale aeroplane to be completely controlled by radio : in this guise it was the Queen Bee, over one hundred of which were built. As the primary use of the Queen Bee was that of an aerial target for A.A. gunnery this seemed rather a waste of a good aeroplane, but presumably it was necessary, and later models at least were not true Tigers inasmuch as the fuselage was of wooden construction instead of the standard metal type.
Without dragging out references, there was one story IIRC of a "Queen Bee" in a Royal Revue, flying sedately along as the might of the King's Fleet let fly.
There was an an apparent age of shot and shell whistling on all paths but the desired and the Target was in danger of flying unharmed out of sight.
At which point the command was given from on high to the Bee's controller:
" FULL RIGHT RUDDER!"
There was an an apparent age of shot and shell whistling on all paths but the desired and the Target was in danger of flying unharmed out of sight.
At which point the command was given from on high to the Bee's controller:
" FULL RIGHT RUDDER!"
Thread Starter
Courtney Mil, that's more like it! I do wonder whether the RAF at the time, as a body corporate, were enthused by such developments. But it also shows that the Air Staff were not quite the conservative, dyed in the wool dinosaurs that they have so often been portrayed, at least between the Wars.
LJ - thanks for the photo. A USAF research paper alludes to further work, a decade later, on jet propelled aerial torpedoes. The Cabinet didn't fund it, but a bunch sausage-side took up the idea
It will be interesting to see what a new biography on Trenchard would bring out. Admittedly, the Andrew Boyle one is not the least critical of Trenchard and was, of course, based on interviews with the man himself, as well as interviews with many of his staff over the years.
As a side note, my copy was presented to a Jack Veitch on 23 March 1963, 'wishing him a very happy and successful captaincy' and signed by about 50 colleagues. Would this have been referring to a RAF aircraft captaincy perchance?
LJ - thanks for the photo. A USAF research paper alludes to further work, a decade later, on jet propelled aerial torpedoes. The Cabinet didn't fund it, but a bunch sausage-side took up the idea
It will be interesting to see what a new biography on Trenchard would bring out. Admittedly, the Andrew Boyle one is not the least critical of Trenchard and was, of course, based on interviews with the man himself, as well as interviews with many of his staff over the years.
As a side note, my copy was presented to a Jack Veitch on 23 March 1963, 'wishing him a very happy and successful captaincy' and signed by about 50 colleagues. Would this have been referring to a RAF aircraft captaincy perchance?
Last edited by Whenurhappy; 23rd Apr 2014 at 10:35.
1920s PPRuNers would have said, "Tush!!! Ridiculous, ungentlemanly nonsense!!! We need knights of the skies manning our aeroplanes.
" Oh, for the days of the R.A.F. when it was that the aeroplanes were made of wood and were flown by men made of steel!
" It's t'other way round these days etc. etc.
"Nothing changes: the Service has obviously been going steadily downhill since April 1st 1918.
