UK Maritime Patrol Aircraft - An Urgent Requirement
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to nail this one and put it to bed...Roland and Camelspyder...I concur (ooh dejavu)
I'm not suggesting (and I don't think anybody else is either) that any outfit can cough up spare bodies...nobody has spare bodies these days.
I'm suggesting that sooner rather than later, the RN will be the only outfit in our military system capable of producing acoustics operators...in fact that may be the case already.
I'm not suggesting (and I don't think anybody else is either) that any outfit can cough up spare bodies...nobody has spare bodies these days.
I'm suggesting that sooner rather than later, the RN will be the only outfit in our military system capable of producing acoustics operators...in fact that may be the case already.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The US of A, and sometimes Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PA. I did. Only so long you can hold back!!
TOFO. you seem to have a very strong opinion of Seedcorn and the limitations thereof. I'm curious as to where you are getting your information
TOFO. you seem to have a very strong opinion of Seedcorn and the limitations thereof. I'm curious as to where you are getting your information
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
TOFO
The RAF currently trains acoustics operators.
I'm suggesting that sooner rather than later, the RN will be the only outfit in our military system capable of producing acoustics operators...in fact that may be the case already.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lancing, Sussex
Age: 92
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is not only "patrol" required it is "attack" capability.
The Nimrod could carry a large variety of stores from depth charges to guided torpedos and even nuclear depth charges.
We have nothing similar other than helicopters, which can carry some attack stores, but do not have sufficient range.
The Nimrod could carry a large variety of stores from depth charges to guided torpedos and even nuclear depth charges.
We have nothing similar other than helicopters, which can carry some attack stores, but do not have sufficient range.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The RAF currently trains acoustics operators.
TOFO. you seem to have a very strong opinion of Seedcorn and the limitations thereof
I might know some of the folks on it...then again, I might not
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But on a more significant note...it is nice to see that the discussion on the future prospects of restoring the MPA capability has moved away from the emotions of the MRA4 and, for the time being a least, silly season on the fanciful vehicles.
I have been pessimistic in the past...but never quite at zero percent so to speak. I am more optimistic now (for quite a few reasons, which need not detain us) but I still feel the costs and difficulties are being understated and with the UK "recovery" quite likely to go into a full stall shortly, I'm still hovering about the 50/50, we might, we might not.
but just to be clear - I want it back as much as any of you out there. I just don't indulge in wishful thinking.
I have been pessimistic in the past...but never quite at zero percent so to speak. I am more optimistic now (for quite a few reasons, which need not detain us) but I still feel the costs and difficulties are being understated and with the UK "recovery" quite likely to go into a full stall shortly, I'm still hovering about the 50/50, we might, we might not.
but just to be clear - I want it back as much as any of you out there. I just don't indulge in wishful thinking.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exnomad
The air-dropped Depth Charge disappeared from the RAF inventory in the late '60s. The Nimrod never carried them.
I claim to be the last RAF pilot to drop a stick of Depth Charges, when in 1973 I was on an exchange tour in Australia flying the Lockheed Neptune.
The Nimrod could carry a large variety of stores from depth charges to guided torpedos and even nuclear depth charges.
I claim to be the last RAF pilot to drop a stick of Depth Charges, when in 1973 I was on an exchange tour in Australia flying the Lockheed Neptune.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SALISBURY
Age: 76
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SAAF Ysterplaat
Just been to see the SAAF Shack at Ysterplaat airbase in Cape Town. Shall I bring it home with me next week?
FORTITER IN RE. (Coincidentally the base motto, mirroring that of Maritime's finest.) That's 42 for our less knowledgeable readers!
Spock
FORTITER IN RE. (Coincidentally the base motto, mirroring that of Maritime's finest.) That's 42 for our less knowledgeable readers!
Spock
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FORTITER IN RE. (Coincidentally the base motto, mirroring that of Maritime's
finest.) That's 42 for our less knowledgeable readers!
Spock
finest.) That's 42 for our less knowledgeable readers!
Spock
Cough, cough, ahem, ahem
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The RAF currently trains acoustics operators.
Are you saying we have the capability, or are actually training acoustic operators?
Are you saying we have the capability, or are actually training acoustic operators?
Yes & Yes...
but I was perhaps disingenuous...
since I did not specify the customer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Undershoot
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would it be worth a civilian operator just offering a platform like the P3 to the RAF on a retainer contract? Minimal cost, then when needed it can be flown by the operator, specialist crew in the back as required until mod make a decision on long term martime platform.
B57 Nuclear Bomb
Mr Neptunus Rex sir, while the British atomic weapons may have disappeared from the RAF inventory in the late 60's ...
A brief google discovered this ...
"The B57 could be deployed by most U.S. fighter, bomber and Navy antisubmarine warfare and patrol aircraft (S-3 Viking and P-3 Orion), and by some U.S. Navy helicopters including the SH-3 Sea King. The B57 was also deployed with Canada's CF-104s in Germany, and the Royal Air Force's Nimrod from RAF St Mawgan and RAF Kinloss in the UK and Malta in the Mediterranean."
I seem to recall it being said that it would take a weapon of this type to crack the hull of some of the Titanium hulled boats we used to chase around after.
also,
there were a number of other weapon types available to be carried by Nimrod's but which were not used - like the sea mines, (the name of which escapes me for the moment)
A brief google discovered this ...
"The B57 could be deployed by most U.S. fighter, bomber and Navy antisubmarine warfare and patrol aircraft (S-3 Viking and P-3 Orion), and by some U.S. Navy helicopters including the SH-3 Sea King. The B57 was also deployed with Canada's CF-104s in Germany, and the Royal Air Force's Nimrod from RAF St Mawgan and RAF Kinloss in the UK and Malta in the Mediterranean."
I seem to recall it being said that it would take a weapon of this type to crack the hull of some of the Titanium hulled boats we used to chase around after.
also,
there were a number of other weapon types available to be carried by Nimrod's but which were not used - like the sea mines, (the name of which escapes me for the moment)
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
HAS59, with respect, what N Rex said was perfectly correct.
Your opening statement was not. British nuclear weapons were available much later.
You mention sea mines; the Vulcan was also designed for mines but they are a very blunt weapon and can deny passage to own forces.
Your opening statement was not. British nuclear weapons were available much later.
You mention sea mines; the Vulcan was also designed for mines but they are a very blunt weapon and can deny passage to own forces.
I should have read it twice ...
Thanks PN,
Yes he said "Air dropped depth charge"
I was referring to the Air Dropped Nuclear Depth Charge (B-57, US supplied for selected NATO allies)
I said " while the British atomic weapons may have disappeared ..." I wasn't saying that they had. It is well documented that the WE177 was around for quite a while after then, but surely not as a depth charge from fixed wing aircraft. (Although you have to feel for the poor souls delivering one from a Wasp!)
The Smart Mine available to the Nimrod was the Stonefish, not all that blunt an instrument as it is able to detect the acoustic signatures of passing ships to determine their validity as a target.
It would be interesting to speculate the range and types of weapon a Future UK Maritime Patrol Aircraft would carry.
Yes he said "Air dropped depth charge"
I was referring to the Air Dropped Nuclear Depth Charge (B-57, US supplied for selected NATO allies)
I said " while the British atomic weapons may have disappeared ..." I wasn't saying that they had. It is well documented that the WE177 was around for quite a while after then, but surely not as a depth charge from fixed wing aircraft. (Although you have to feel for the poor souls delivering one from a Wasp!)
The Smart Mine available to the Nimrod was the Stonefish, not all that blunt an instrument as it is able to detect the acoustic signatures of passing ships to determine their validity as a target.
It would be interesting to speculate the range and types of weapon a Future UK Maritime Patrol Aircraft would carry.