Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

BOI into the 2012 Tornado Collision over the Moray Firth

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

BOI into the 2012 Tornado Collision over the Moray Firth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Dec 2013, 06:52
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be nice to know if he has recovered enough to return to duty, and has not suffered life-changing injuries.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 07:21
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
MoD will not release the report to the general public until after the Scottish Fatal Accident Investigation. Why not?

A disturbing turn of events. As the BoI typically only addresses the final act (i.e. ignores its remit) this makes it even more important that interested parties get to see what has been omitted, to better inform proper inquires.

Clearly, MoD is learning lessons from Nimrod, Chinook, Hercules etc, where in each case the BoI remains largely incomplete and the pertinent facts were uncovered by ex-MoD staff. This ethos could only prosper under an MAA that panders to its masters' demands.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 15:50
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is because some people 'could' go to jail over this...
MSOCS is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 16:19
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
MSOCS

Surely the same could be, and was, said about XV230? The likes of Thames Valley Police and the Provost Marshal were, I recall, awful keen to proceed against a couple of junior officers, but as soon as the evidence clearing them and pointing to a few Stars was submitted, they suddenly decided there wasn't sufficient evidence. I look forward to events developing!
tucumseh is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 17:32
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Tuc, Service Law was changed after XV230 so the 'could' is a lot closer than ever before.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 18:49
  #46 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol Temple Meads
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We also have the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicde Act 2007, which came into force on 6th April 2008 - too late for Nimrod.

DV
Distant Voice is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 18:57
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
That is true DV but it is an incredibly difficult Act to achieve a prosecution with. Service Law can have you in prison just for failing to check for accuracy for anything airworthiness related, even without an accident. The additional changes in Service Law in recent week makes it an offence for anyone to try and influence a police investigation in any way. Current star ranks do not have the level of protection enjoyed by their predecessors.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 19:03
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
JTO

Thanks. I seem to recall this being discussed before and, from memory, the Air Force Act 1955 (and successors) included an offence of (for example) making false certification, carrying up to 2 years in gaol. Only, senior officers and ministers actually took the view that refusing an order to make false certification is a disciplinary offence, and remains so. So any attempted prosecution would be interesting, as exhibit A for the defence would be these ministerial rulings. I think that was one reason why TVP didn't want to know about XV230.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 19:05
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Yep, things have moved on.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 19:24
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Corporate manslaughter has been illegal for around 30 years by one statue or another. To my knowledge the only successful prosecution was the one-man owner of the adventurous training company in the Lyme bay canoe tragedy.

There is zero political will to pass an enforceable law on this, in any of the major parties.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2013, 10:19
  #51 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol Temple Meads
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fox3 WMB

The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 is a landmark in law. For the first time, companies and organisations can be found guilty of corporate manslaughter as a result of serious management failures resulting in a gross breach of a duty of care. MoD fits the bill.

DV
Distant Voice is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2013, 13:47
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
DV

It's not law that matters, it's effective law.
Since the Act came in, there have been over 700 fatal injuries at work of workers, and about the same again to members of the public related to work, and 4 prosecutions. Two of these were definitely of small/one-owner firms, and I believe the other two were too.

I await prosecutions of large companies......
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2013, 08:19
  #53 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol Temple Meads
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So it has been one near miss every two weeks for the last 15 years for Tornado,

SNP reveal shocking near-collision aircraft stats | Scottish National Party

DV
Distant Voice is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2013, 09:24
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least they didn't use the collision stats as well.

Personally, I do recollect floating around North Rhine Westphalia in the 80s and whenever the 'fins' were about we tended to look out even more. Either that or we flew even lower and hoped that the bleedin' Harriers weren't having fun. The perception was that GR1 cockpit toys drew eyes in.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2013, 09:48
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Another completely useless set of SNP "statistics". Comparing Tornado airprox reports with 737, which takes off, transits and lands under continuous air traffic control in protected airspace. Comparing Harrier with Tornado - how many flying hours did each type fly during the period in question? Just two examples from that one piece.

SNP stats

I wonder what point they are really trying to make.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2013, 10:35
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,199
Received 116 Likes on 52 Posts
I wonder what point they are really trying to make.
Lack of TCAS in fast jets seems to be the thrust of some people and their agenda.
downsizer is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2013, 11:10
  #57 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol Temple Meads
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CM.

The 361 near misses in 15 years is not a statistic invented by the SNP, but a documented reality produced by the MoD. If Angus Robertson's comparisons help speed up the introduction of TCAS in Tornado, then good for him. It has, according to MoD, been under investigation/consideration/work in progress for 23 years, a period of time which included Haddon-Cave's "Gold period for airworthiness"; just like Nimrod and Chinook.

I would have thought that these must be "concered" conditions for crews to fly under, and in my opinion is worse than the Nimrod incident with regards to "duty of care". With Nimrod is was plain ignorance of what was going on with the fuel and hot air systems, with Tornado the constant delays to fit TCAS shows a total disregard for human life.

DV
Distant Voice is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2013, 11:22
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Dumb question - don't you have a radar for precisely this kind of thing. More importantly, if a 'mate' can get that close without you noticing, so can the enemy.....
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2013, 12:36
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Lack of TCAS in fast jets seems to be the thrust of some people and their agenda.
So what is your alternative suggestion to the solution proposed but not implemented by MoD?
dervish is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2013, 14:11
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,199
Received 116 Likes on 52 Posts
Didn't say I had one. Just saying that TCAS is what some people are driving at. You can crack on now.
downsizer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.