Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The Kestrel.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 05:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The Kestrel.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=00c_1371856755
Load Toad is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 05:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wat that moustache at 1:14 standard RAF issue
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 05:39
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Actually I meant to post in Aviation History & Nostalgia - can a Mod transfer it over...?

Last edited by Load Toad; 22nd Jun 2013 at 05:39.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 07:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Load Toad

You can just delete the original post and the whole thread will vanish, then re-post as you intended. Not sure anyone minds it being here though - I wouldn't have seen it otherwise!

STH
SirToppamHat is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 08:12
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Terrific footage. The Tri-partites certainly did a great job. Some of the pad work after 6:50 looked potentially exciting - evidence of the odd bit of 'market gardening' around the pad.

NB Putting the smoke flare directly UPWIND of the pad
BOAC is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 08:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,601
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Great film, but I'm not sure in these more sensitive days that the MOD would be happy showing drinking and smoking in uniform!

Which airfield was the Sqn based at?
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 09:04
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am getting message "video not found" - is it still there?
Wander00 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 09:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hove
Age: 72
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Worked OK with me just a few minutes ago.
clicker is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 09:29
  #9 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which airfield was the Sqn based at?
- West Raynham I recall.

EDIT: Courtesy of Google and Harrier.org:

"The first of the Tripartite evaluation aircraft flew in March 1964, the others following along at regular intervals until the last flew in March 1965. Initially these aircraft were known as P.1127s but in November 1964 they were given the name Hawker Siddeley Kestrel FGA Mk.1. Not only did the Kestrel have many of the limitations of the P.1127 removed, it was also, like the earlier aircraft, fully stressed for combat operations, with provision for extra pylons and equipment, such as a Doppler navigator and auto-stabiliser - in fact, it was essentially the aircraft the RAF would have received had they pursued GOR345. However, as money was limited for the trials, this equipment was never fitted. The Tripartite programme involved pilots from the RAF, Luftwaffe, and three US services - Army, Navy and Air Force. Training on the Kestrel began at Dunsfold in the latter part of 1964, with the Tripartite squadron officially forming at RAF West Raynham on 1 April 1965. The objective of these trials was to establish the ground-rules for the operation of jet V/STOL fighters. This meant that emphasis was placed on operating techniques such as short take-off, dispersed site operations and concealment, rather than on flying attack missions. Although such sorties were simulated, no weapons were ever carried by Kestrels. In total 1,367 sorties were flown during the trials, which lasted until 30 November 1965. A huge amount was learnt about operations in the field, including the effects of hot gas re-ingestion, ground erosion and ways to alleviate both effects."

Last edited by BOAC; 22nd Jun 2013 at 10:13.
BOAC is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2013, 15:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"and three US services - Army, Navy and Air Force"

No Marines. Ironic really
Milo Minderbinder is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2013, 17:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,643
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
Load Toad,

Great find. Thanks.


Milo,

I think whoever wrote that was lumping the USMC in with the USN!

Lt Col Lou Solt USMC

Last edited by India Four Two; 23rd Jun 2013 at 17:10.
India Four Two is online now  
Old 23rd Jun 2013, 17:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The USMC did not take part in the evaluation, so it was very ironic as per above.
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2013, 19:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 71
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smashing history,

For what it's worth, and probably totally irrelevant, I was a member of 214 Entry, Craft Apprentices, RAF Halton. As an Airframe trainee, I was in Kestrel Flight. Our block was straight accross the road from 2 Wing NAAFI. Sorry chaps, I thought the fact that in 1969 Halton was acknowledging this aircrafts contribution was worth a mention. Happy daze

Smudge
smujsmith is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2013, 20:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,325
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Just remind me why we got rid of the Harrier again.....................
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2013, 23:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
I remember visiting Boscombe Down in c 1964 as an ATC cadet. Saw the Kestrel then, and the TSR2s as they were being taken apart ....
reynoldsno1 is online now  
Old 24th Jun 2013, 06:02
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
I'm sure I remember a Kestrel (not a Harrier) being involved in some tests on Cranwell North aerodrome in about 1973?

if I recall correctly, it had large external spoilers fitted and was doing some form of ground bearing strength testing, involving charging up and down the grass at various weights.
BEagle is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2013, 09:21
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheshire
Age: 82
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
A lot of the off-airfield work was done at RAF Bircham Newton, and some of the pilots lived in the married quarters there.
X767 is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2013, 10:00
  #18 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,394
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts








Hawker Siddeley P.1127 in flight at NASA Langley 1968

Hawker Siddeley P.1127

The Kestrel's first flight was on 7 March 1964. These equipped the Tripartite Evaluation Squadron formed at RAF West Raynham in Norfolk in March 1965.[16] The Evaluation pilots developed a typical sortie routine for the Kestrel of conducting short take-offs (STO) and returning to base on vertical landings.[17] This manner of operation (STOVL) was judged to be the optimal practice.[18] Operating from rough airstrips was also trialled at nearby RAF Bircham Newton, where the aircraft proved adept at traversing boggy ground and taking off from a variety of temporary ground coverings.[19] During testing one aircraft was lost;[15] the evaluations were finalised in November 1965.[20]

Six of the eight surviving evaluation aircraft (the three allocated to the U.S. plus those allocated to Germany) were transferred to the U.S.[15] for evaluation by the Army, Air Force, and Navy as the XV-6A Kestrel. After Tri-Service evaluation they were passed to the USAF for further evaluation at Edwards Air Force Base, except for two that were assigned to NASA.[21] One of the two remaining British-based Kestrels was attached to the Blind Landing Experimental Unit (BLEU) at RAE Bedford and the other, XS693, went to Blackburn for modification to take the uprated Pegasus 6 engine.[22]

....Experience gained during naval testing on board the commando carrier HMS Bulwark in 1966 convinced project officers that less reactive materials would be substituted for all uses of magnesium in the Kestrel's airframe, in any further prototypes and production aircraft.[24]
ORAC is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2013, 11:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
One was dinged by Colonel Gerhard Barkhorn of the Luftwaffe. He mentioned afterwards that it should be added to the tally of other RAF aircraft he had damaged between 1939 and 1945!
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 07:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: welshpol
Age: 67
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P1127(RAF)

Anybody out there worked on or has any information to share on xv281 pre production Harrier
xv281 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.